中國的大城市比美國的大城市更發(fā)達(dá)嗎？（六）

原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.ltaaa.com 翻譯：squart 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
回答一：

V Kweyama
No two cities on planet earth are alike, therefore, making general comparisons is simply impossible,
In many aspects …
Yes some large Chinese cities are far more advanced than their American counterparts,
and
In many aspects, some large Chinese cities are less advanced than their American counterparts.
The difference comes in the fact that large modern Chinese cities are almost new constructs, built on the knowledge gleaned and gained from observing the mistakes of large city developments all over the world, and correcting the errors that come with developing such constructs prior to constructing anything.
The government owns the land, not private individuals, therefore, leasehold is prent. Also, when leasehold expires, the government can demolish wholesale and correct the errors learned along the way.
Presently … Pollution has been a problem, however, again … lessons have been learned and solutions are being implemented to mitigate and even nullify the pollution problem.

地球上沒有兩個城市是一樣的，因此，進(jìn)行一般性的比較是不可能的，
在很多方面…中國的一些大城市確實(shí)要比美國大城市先進(jìn)得多，
另外，還有很多方面，中國大城市不如美國的城市先進(jìn)。
不同之處在于，中國的現(xiàn)代大城市幾乎都是新的建筑，是在了解了世界各地大城市發(fā)展的錯誤以及學(xué)得的經(jīng)驗(yàn)之后，再新建起來的。
而且，土地所有者是政府，而不是私人，因此，土地租賃是很普遍的。同時(shí)，租賃期滿后，政府可以對其進(jìn)行整體拆除，并將以往的錯誤糾正。
現(xiàn)在，污染已經(jīng)成為一個問題，但是，它們再一次吸取了教訓(xùn)，正在想辦法解決，以減輕甚至消除污染問題。
回答二：
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Stephen Thompson
In terms of physical infrastructure Chinese cities have caught up but in terms of human development they are decades behind. Intellectual attainment, cultural diversity, academic production, artistic achievement, educational attainment, rule of law, human rights and freedom of expression: Chinese cities are at the bottom of international league tables. They are behind India in many of these respects, even though India is a poorer country with more difficult cultural problems with which to deal.

就基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施而言，中國大城市已經(jīng)趕上來了，但就人類發(fā)展而言，中國還落后了幾十年。人文素養(yǎng)、文化多樣性、學(xué)術(shù)成果、藝術(shù)成就、教育成就、法治、RQ和言論ZY：中國城市在國際排行上幾乎墊底。盡管印度是一個貧窮的國家，有更棘手的問題，但是很多方面上，他們落后于印度。
回答三：

Michael Martinez
Several things in Shanghai are more developed than what’s here in the States:
public transportation especially the high speed train system
the ability to pay for anything, anywhere with your phone
the efficiency with which city streets are kept clean
delivery services whereby you can buy anything online and it will be delivered to your office or residence within a few hours
the efficiency with which new high rise construction occurs
the lack of crime

在這幾個方面，上海比美國更發(fā)達(dá)：
公共交通，特別是高速鐵路系統(tǒng)；
用手機(jī)支付任何消費(fèi)的能力；
城市街道保持清潔的效率；
提供送貨服務(wù)，你可以在網(wǎng)上購買任何東西，并在幾個小時(shí)內(nèi)送到你的辦公室或住所；
新建高層建筑的效率；
低犯罪率。
回答四：

Sawyer Mifsud
If we go by economic development China still has the GDP per capita of a developing nation, although that is partly due to a poor rural population the average US city dweller will be better off than the average PRC one.
If we go by modernity. Well then of course China wins that. Most of their urban development happened in the last two decades. Most US cities are full of old buildings and are so built up it''''s hard to seriously renovate them.
Personally I place a greater importance on the economic factor but its subjective.

如果從經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的角度看，中國的人均GDP仍然是發(fā)展中國家的水平，盡管這部分原因在于貧困的農(nóng)村人口，但美國城市居民的平均收入高于中國城市居民的平均收入水平。
如果我們按照現(xiàn)代化程度來看，那當(dāng)然是中國獲勝。他們的城市大多是最近20年時(shí)間發(fā)展起來的，而美國大多數(shù)的城市，都是老建筑，而且建得很高，很難對這些建筑真正翻新。
我個人更重視經(jīng)濟(jì)方面的因素，但這只是我的主觀看法。
回答五：
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Kwan Ng
Those cities were built a long time ago with different needs in mind. Look at these major asian cities in the future after a similar passage of time and let us know if they are still all up to date. I think some will have been renewed to an extent because many asian cities are so densely populated they can afford to do it and must do it to keep them viable. Some may require buildings to be rebuilt as they simply do not last very long.
In the UK there are many buildings from centuries ago which are still as solid today and will outlast many newer buildings.

那些城市是很久以前建造的，有著不同的需求。
看看這些亞洲城市，在經(jīng)過同樣長的時(shí)候后，讓我們看看它們是否仍然是最新的。
我認(rèn)為，一些城市將在一定程度上得到更新，因?yàn)樵S多亞洲城市人口稠密，他們有能力做到這一點(diǎn)，而且必須做到這一點(diǎn)，以保持它們的生存能力。有些建筑可能需要重建，因?yàn)樗鼈儾粫掷m(xù)很長時(shí)間。
在英國，有許多幾百年前的建筑，今天仍然堅(jiān)固，比許多新的建筑更耐用。
回答六：

Kev Bough
In terms of public transport, cleanliness, and infrastructure, yes, big cities in China are cleaner than in the US. There are also newer skyscrapers and airports in Chinese cities. But if we talk about smaller towns, Chinese towns are still inferior to American towns.
American cities are like classic old cars. They’re old, but it doesn’t mean they’re bad. It’s charming in certain ways and it reflects the country’s golden age in the past. Chinese cities are like brand new cars. They’re high tech, sophisticated, but don’t have the same charm as the old cars. Both countries are appealing in their own way.

在公共交通、清潔和基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施方面，是的，中國的大城市比美國干凈。中國城市里也有更新的摩天大樓和機(jī)場，但如果我們談?wù)撔〕擎?zhèn)，中國城鎮(zhèn)仍然比不上美國城鎮(zhèn)。
美國城市就像經(jīng)典的舊車，它們很老，但并不意味著他們很差，它在某些方面很迷人，反映了這個國家過去的黃金時(shí)代，中國城市就像嶄新的汽車，它們是高科技，很精密，但沒有舊車那樣有魅力。兩個國家都在以自己的方式吸引別人。
回答七：

Man Kun Fong
Beijing and Shanghai look more developed because China keep on building infrastructures to boost GDP. On the outside it looks amazing. But I wouldn''''t call them more developed than western developed country. Because obviously they only care about what eyes could see and don’t care about what goes underground: all big cities in China has terrible sewage system. Those cities would flood when it rain too much.

北京和上海看起來更發(fā)達(dá)，因?yàn)橹袊恢痹诮ㄔO(shè)基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施，以提振GDP。從表面上看，它們很令人震驚，但我不認(rèn)為他們比西方發(fā)達(dá)國家更發(fā)達(dá)，因?yàn)楹苊黠@，他們只關(guān)心眼睛能看到什么，而不關(guān)心內(nèi)在：中國所有的大城市都有糟糕的排水系統(tǒng)，如果雨下得太多，那些城市就會內(nèi)澇泛濫。
回答八：

Andrew Chan
Development is not just building new and innovative buildings. If so, all it takes is money.
It is the ability to blend in the new with the old and preserving historical buildings and cultures for starters. This goes beyond just money. It is the ability to understand, appreciate .
Further, having brand new buildings, there is also the issue of maintenance. Both within and surroundings.

發(fā)達(dá)不僅僅是建造新建筑。如果這樣的話，那有錢就可以了。
發(fā)達(dá)是一種將新舊建筑融為一體的能力，首先是保存歷史建筑和文化的能力，這不僅僅是錢，它是一種理解、欣賞的能力。
此外，擁有全新的建筑，還存在維修問題，無論是在內(nèi)部還是外面。
回答九：
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Li-Ping Yuan
Yes, the US economic boom was from 1920 to 1970 and many building and cities were constructed at that time. The booming period in China is from 1980 up to now. Certainly, US cities look older and Chinese cities are more modern.
In addition, in US, most of rich/mid income people live in the suburb of large cities while many cities have poor inner city areas. This is probably not common in China.

是的，美國的經(jīng)濟(jì)繁榮是從1920年到1970年，許多建筑和城市都是在那個時(shí)候建造的。中國的繁榮時(shí)期是從1980年至今。當(dāng)然，美國的城市看起來更古老，中國的城市則更現(xiàn)代化。
此外，在美國，大多數(shù)富人或者中等收入者，生活在大城市的郊區(qū)，而許多城市有貧窮的市中心，這在中國可能并不常見。
回答十：

Lance Chen
I do not think they are more developed in the sense of US cities are lack of sufficient service.
Straight speaking, of course, Chinese cities are newly built compare to here in the US.
Is there a need for US city to do a catch up? I do not think so, at least not in the large scale.
If we are OK with our surroundings, why waste the tax payer money.

相比美國城市，我不認(rèn)為他們的城市更發(fā)達(dá)，因?yàn)樗鼈兂鞘械姆?wù)做得還不夠。
當(dāng)然，直截了當(dāng)?shù)卣f，與美國相比，中國的城市是新建的。
美國的城市有必要去追趕（中國城市）嗎？我不這么認(rèn)為，至少在規(guī)模上不需要。
如果我們覺得周圍環(huán)境可以，為什么要浪費(fèi)納稅人的錢。

原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處