你支持同性結婚嗎？ 為什么？
Do you support same-sex marriage? Why?
譯文簡介
外國知乎上的問題，且看看老外的態(tài)度是什么.
正文翻譯
Do you support same-sex marriage? Why?
你支持同性結婚嗎？ 為什么？
你支持同性結婚嗎？ 為什么？
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 1 )
收藏
Yes and no. Let me explain.Without a doubt, I support the right for two consenting adults of whatever sex to spend their lives together and officially become a familial unit. There's no question about that. A same-sex couple is theoretically as capable of becoming parents as a heterosexual one is; they just have to either use in vitro or adopt kids.Now here's where the no part comes in. Marriage is traditionally a religious concept, a system that democratizes the nuclear family unit and makes it available to everyone who isn't the pack alpha wolf. This was a social agreement that was strongly reinforced by religion to the point that you could say completely interwoven into most major religions of today. These religions also often frown upon same-sex marriage.I do not support forcing religious institutions to marry a same-sex couple if it goes against their beliefs. There is absolutely no reason to force a traditional marriage ceremony if the ceremony goes against that tradition. However, there's no problem when the religious institutions themselves are cool with it. A Norwegian friend of mine told me an interesting story - some churches back where she's from were actually offering to marry gay couples despite this. If they want to, they can and should be able to marry the same-sex couples.I mean, the reason why we have these debates about gay marriage is because it's a law thing and a tax break thing. If it were up to me, I'd have government hands off the idea of marriage entirely, but that would be a nightmarish mess when it comes to a lot of things. Census, family laws, all sorts of stuff.So at the very least if we're staying with government around, civil unxs and stuff at the very minimum should be okayed.
回答1：
支持還是不支持，先聽我解釋解釋：不用說，只要是成年人，雙方自愿一起過生活，無論什么性別，我都支持. 理論上，同性夫妻和異性夫妻，都有能力成為孩子的父母. 他們可以要試管嬰兒，也可以收養(yǎng)孩子. 現(xiàn)在，說一些純碎理念的東西： 婚姻在傳統(tǒng)上是一種宗教觀念，是一種強化家庭觀念的制度，每個人都有個家庭，而不是像狼群那樣. 這是一種被宗教強烈強化的社會共識，可以說是完全融入了今天的大多數(shù)主要宗教。這些宗教經常反對同性婚姻。
如果某個宗教不愿為同性婚姻舉行儀式，那么，我反對世人強迫宗教機構去給同性婚姻舉行儀式. 如果婚禮儀式違背傳統(tǒng)，那就完全沒有理由舉行傳統(tǒng)的婚禮儀式。宗教機構完全可以冷談處理同性婚姻. 不過，我的挪威朋友跟我說了些有趣的事情——她的家鄉(xiāng)，有些教堂給同性婚姻提供服務. 只要雙方愿意，雙方可以，也應該結婚. 我的意思是說，我們之所以爭論同性婚姻，原因是同性婚姻涉及到法律和稅收. 如果由我來決定的話，我會讓政府不要干涉同性婚姻. 不過，這樣做也會帶肋很多問題，比如人口普查，家庭法，還有其他各種各樣的問題. 若我們跟政府保持一致的話，那同性婚姻，還可以接受.
I do.For me, it is something fundamental. There are various reasons why I support same-sex marriage. However, whenever I speak with someone who is opposed to the idea I usually try to convince them with this argument:I ask them: Are you gay? Or bisexual? Or something else that is not considered heterosexual?The answer is usually no.I go on: Okay then, do you have family members or friends who belong to the LGBTQ+ community?The answer is usually no.I continue: Then why do you oppose same-sex marriage? You are not involved in it. Neither is someone close to you. Why do you care then, what others do? It’s not your life - it’s theirs.You don’t get to decide what they can or can’t do.If they are allowed to be legally united, it does not have any effect on you. It does not have an influence on your life or the quality of your life. You do not have to do anything against your own will. The sun will rise just like it did any other day up until this point: you can still do as you please.For you, nothing will change. You still can marry the one you love. You still can start a family, settle down, have a job, do the things that make you happy.The only thing that will change that a lot of others can do the same: they can finally, just like you do, find happiness on someone’s side and have that love legally recognized in the eyes of the state.Because they are human, just like you and I, and they deserve to have the same rights as we have whether they are gay or not.Labels don’t matter but love does.After this little monologue, people are usually quiet. I’m pretty sure they aren’t entirely convinced after hearing my speech but I sure do give them something to think about.
回答2：
我支持同性婚姻. 原因很多： 每次我跟別人辯論時，我都會問他們是不是同性戀、雙性戀或別的什么與眾不同的戀，他們會說：不是. 然后我再追問他們的朋友呢，他們會回答說也不是. 于是，我直接說：既然你不是，你朋友也不是，那你跟同性婚姻一毛錢關系都沒有，你憑啥反對同性婚姻啊？ 別人怎么做，關你什么事??？ 那是他們的生活方式，又不是你的生活方式，你有什么權利決定別人采取什么生活方式？ 如果他們同性結婚是合法的，那他們對你又沒有任何影響，你的生活一如既往，明天的生活照樣升起，你愛干啥干啥，什么都沒有改變. 你仍然可以和你愛的人結婚，你仍然可以組建家庭，安居樂業(yè)，做自己快樂的事情. 不管那些人是不是同性戀，他們首先都是人，跟你我一樣，他們都應該享有和我們一樣的權利. 其他的事都不重要，重要的是愛！我說出這么簡淺的道理后，跟我辯論的人通常都會安靜下來，我相信他們并沒有完全信服我的觀點，但我確實給了他們一些值得思考的東西。
Yes, I do support same-sex marriage because I am a member of the LGBTQ+ community and I think that there should be more acceptance. People should be allowed to marry no matter what race, gender, or sexuality they are. Marriage is defined as ‘the legally or formally recognized unx of two people as partners in a personal relationship’, even if they are the same sex it is still united, two people. So, therefore, two females, two males, a male and a female, any genders should be allowed to marry.
EDIT:
Nic Jones asked if the marriage should be between only two people. That is a difficult topic and obviously very controversial. Personally, I don’t agree with marriages consisting of multiple people (polyamory) however I won’t discriminate if someone is part of a marriage like this or supports it. This is whether it a heterosexual marriage, homosexual, etc…They also asked my view on the children that result from these arrangements and is it fair that children now grow up in an environment where they are being deprived of mom or dad. I believe that it is fair. The gender of the parent doesn’t affect how well they can look after their child. Biologically the difference between a male and a female is a penis or vagina which doesn’t affect the child in any way. Two mums or two dads can look after the child just as well as the typical mum and dad family. He suggested children no longer have the right to be raised by mum and dad and is that fair to the child. I wouldn’t call it a ‘right’ to be raised by a mum and a dad. It is mum and dad because dad’s sperm fertilises mum’s eggs. If mum could fertilise mum instead, then maybe getting raised by two mum’s would be a norm.
回答3：
是的，我支持同性婚姻，因為我是同性白左的一員，我覺得，應該有更多的人接受同性。無論人們是什么種族，什么性別，性取向如何，都應該可以結婚. 婚姻的定義是“法律上或正式承認的兩個人作為個人關系的伴侶的結合”，即使他們是同性的，但他們仍然是結合在一起的，兩個人是結合在一起的。因此，兩個女性，兩個男性，一個男性和一個女性，任何性別都應該可以結婚.
后面的故事：
尼克·瓊斯提出了這樣一個問題:婚姻是否只應該發(fā)生在兩個人之間。這是一個很難回答的話題，顯然也很有爭議。就我個人而言，我不同意一夫多妻制的婚姻，但是，我也不會歧視這種婚姻. 他們還問我怎么看待這種婚姻生出的孩子，還問我，孩子在單親家庭中成長，對孩子公平嗎，我相信，公平！ 因為：父母的性別并不影響他們照顧孩子的能力。從生物學上來說，男性和女性的區(qū)別在于陰莖或陰道，而這對孩子沒有任何影響。兩個媽媽或兩個爸爸可以像典型的爸爸媽媽家庭一樣照顧孩子。跟我辯論的人又問：孩子沒有權利接受爸爸或媽媽的撫養(yǎng)，這對孩子來說公平嗎？ 我不認為被父母撫養(yǎng)是一種“權利”。是媽媽和爸爸，因為爸爸的精子使媽媽的卵子受精。如果一個女性可以讓媽媽受孕，那么，孩子由兩個媽媽撫養(yǎng)長大就會成為一種常態(tài)。
Yes.I don′t understand why homosexuality may be legal, but same-sex marriage may not sometimes. If you′re letting people have homosexual relationships, you should let them marry, it makes sense to me
I have written before of my country′s culture, and how it′s still a kind of homophobic society. We youngsters may take for granted our sexualities will be respected, but outside there are people who don′t like people liking their same gender, or their same and opposite gender, or any sexuality there exists.Here is a map of my country. Maps for me are what Venn diagrams are for Ethan.In dark blue, states where same-sex marriage is allowed. In light blue, states where same-sex legal unxs are performed, but not marriage. In purple, states where marriage or civil unx is allowed but travelling outside the state, and finally, in green, states where no civil unx or marriage is performed.However, the fact is legally allowed doesn′t mean people take it well, which some people effectively, do not. Catholicism is dominant here, and more religious people don′t tend to see well homosexual relationships, let alone marriage.This, fortunately, is changing. I′ll tell you a story.My grandfather is a boomer and holds very conservative views. But he needed legal advice for a business, so my uncle offered to bring one of his friends (who is a lawyer) home and explain to him what he needed. This friend of his is gay.The conversation was something like this, with A being my grandfather and B, my uncle.
A: Is he going to bring someone with him? His girlfriend?
B: Maybe his boyfriend.
A: Boyfriend?
B: Yes, his boyfriend.
A: I just don′t want them kissing themselves here.
B: No, why would they?
Eventually, this friend came, they talked a little, and apparently his view of homosexuality is now more positive than before. Maybe he still doesn′t like them, but it′s progress.
I do support same-sex marriage, and its legality shouldn′t even be an issue, but we can only dream as of today.
回答4：
我支持同性結婚.我不明白為什么同性戀可能是合法的，但是同性婚姻可能不是。如果你讓人們有同性戀關系，你應該讓他們結婚，我就是這么理解的.
我以前寫過關于我的國家的文化，以及它是如何仍然是一個恐同的社會。我們年輕人可能會想當然地認為我們的性行為會得到尊重，但在外面有些人不喜歡別人喜歡他們的同性、同性或異性，或者任何存在的性行為。
這是我們國家的地圖。這個地圖對我來說就像維恩圖解對伊森一樣。
地圖上深藍色區(qū)域是允許同性婚姻的州，淺藍色部分是允許同性合法結合但不允許結婚的州，紫色代表允許結婚或民事結合但不允許在本州以外的州，最后綠色代表不允許進行民事結合或婚姻的州。不過，法律允許的事實并不意味著人們就完全接受，這這里，天主教占主導地位，信教的人往往看不慣同性戀，更不用說同性戀婚姻了. 不過，現(xiàn)在的情況正在漸漸的改變.
我給你們講個故事：我祖父是嬰兒潮一代，他的觀點非常保守。但他做生意時，需要咨詢一些法律方面的問題，于是我叔叔就請他的一位律師朋友過來跟我祖父討論，我叔的這個朋友是個同性戀。
我祖父跟我叔叔的對話如下： （A是我的祖父）.
A: 他會帶人來嗎?他的女朋友嗎?
B: 也許是他的男朋友。
A: 男朋友嗎?
B: 是的，他的男朋友。
A: 我只是不想讓他們在這里親吻自己。
B: 放心，他們?yōu)槭裁匆谶@里接吻?
最后，這個朋友來了，他們聊了一會兒，顯然，我祖父現(xiàn)在對同性戀的看法比以前更積極了。也許他仍然不喜歡他們，但現(xiàn)在，他進步了。我確實支持同性婚姻，我們甚至不應該討論它的合法性問題，不過我們現(xiàn)在只能夢想一下同性婚姻合法了。
I am on the fence. I am not gay and so it does not affect me whether gay people get married or not. If it happens - it doesn't bother me. If it doesn't - it also doesn't bother me.However for the sake of seeing the other point of view (as basically everyone here has said yes) - the reason I am not actively supporting it is because I do not understand why they should get married. Marraige is between a man and a woman and I so not know why they want this. Of course, this is very broad - I do know gay people who don't are for marraige! I believe they should have the legal rights - but I don't think they should call it marraige. That is disrespectful to religion as it was derived from religion. Why should they have this? Why must gay people have everything? They have gay bars, gay celeration - they are always treated special. If they want true equality then gay bars should be illegal. Either that or we should be able to have strictly "straight bars".
回答5：
我有點猶豫不知道怎么回答這個問題，我不是同性戀，所以同性戀者是否結婚對我都沒有影響. 不過，（這里幾乎所有人都支持同性戀結婚）我支持這種婚姻的原因是：我想不明白同性戀為什么應該結婚. 結婚是一個男人和一個女人之間的事，我真不知道同性戀為什么要結婚。當然，我知道他們大部分戀愛不是為了結婚.
我相信同性戀應該有合法的權利，但我不認為他們應該稱之為婚姻。這是對宗教的不尊重，因為婚姻來源于宗教。
他們?yōu)槭裁匆Y婚?為什么同性戀者必須擁有一切?他們有同性戀酒吧、同性戀狂歡節(jié)——他們一直都有特殊待遇了。如果他們想要真正的平等，那么同性戀酒吧應該是非法的，或者，作為對等，我們應該再設上真正的“異性戀酒吧”。
在我的家鄉(xiāng)，我聽說很多同性戀歧視異性戀。用一種貶損的方式叫我們“飼養(yǎng)員”。是的，確實有恐同者，但每個人都受到了虐待——同性戀者只是更加直言不諱，更加“我，我，我!”
事實上，我認為同性戀比反對同性戀更容易被接受(雖然我不是)。但如果我在公開場合說出這一面，我肯定會受到騷擾。然而，成為同性戀在某種程度上被稱贊和贊賞為“與眾不同”，“做你自己”。為什么現(xiàn)在有這么多的同性戀——不要否認——人們真的是寬容同性戀.
但就像我說的，我還在猶豫，這只是我的想法的一方面。我對這兩種觀點都有強烈的看法，當人們因為他們的不同而挑剔別人時，我會非常保守。
這件事對我沒有影響，所以我不完全支持它，但我絕對不反對它。
我不會“集會”、抗議或大吵大鬧，我只是靜靜旁觀，有同沒同，都微笑面對.
YES, I do.I believe such questions should not exist. How often we ask “Do you support marraiges between males and females?” There is no need to interfere in someone’s life, it’s as simple as that. They love a girl, boy or a trans. It’s their choice. Who are you to intervene? They have equal rights to raise a family and be happy. I hate it when I see people making fun of gays or lesbians. The way they dress is different but at the same time beautiful andmust be accepted. It’s not just India , in every corner of this miserable world , LGBT community are being targetted by arrogant and conservative crowd. But here, situation is worse. Accordiung to a survey, approximately 11% people in India are gay. Maybe the uncle living next door is one and he is living an inadequate life within society’s parameters.
I’ve never seen a same sex couple but I know people who are gays and Lesbians and you know what they all want to leave this country and settle in Australia or America because they can’t imagine raising thrir children amidst this giant ridicule and criticism which they encounter everyday. Their homosexuality cannot be the only aspect of their life. It cannot get dominating enbough to mask their achievements and talents. I marvel at the courage of each of those who take the big step to come out and not just bury it inside.To all those who believe that ‘LGBT community are hijacking Indian culture’. Homosexuality has been there in India since ancient times. It’s not any new strange sickness or genetic mutation of millenials as you often suggest. Rigveda says “what seems unusal is also natural”. An another indicator of the liberal Hindu heritage, Kama Sutra. a whole chapter is devoted to homosexuality saying it has to be engaged in and enjoyed as one of the arts. It categorizes men who desire other men as third naturea nd refers to long term unxs between them.sculptures in Khajuraho I strongly believe that like dissolving 377, Supreme court shall legalise same sex marraiges too because considering homosexuality an offence is clearly a western concept.
回答6：
是的，我支持同性戀結婚. 我覺得，根本就不該問這樣的問題，我們會時不時的問一句“你支持男女結婚嗎？” 無論他們喜歡女孩、男孩還是喜歡變性人，都是他們自己的選擇，你憑什么干涉別人的選擇？ 沒必要干涉別人的生活，他們也有平等的權利來建立家庭，享受快樂，道理就這么簡單.
我討厭看到人們取笑男同性戀或女同性戀。他們的穿著方式不同，但也很漂亮，大家必須接受。不僅僅是印度，在這個悲慘世界的每個角落，同性群體都被傲慢保守的人群盯上了。但在印度這里，情況更糟。根據一項調查，印度大約有11%的人是同性戀。也許住在隔壁的叔叔就是一個這樣的人，他的生活不符合社會的標準。我本身沒有見過同性夫妻，但我認識男同性戀和女同性戀，你知道嗎，他們都想離開這個國家，定居到澳大利亞或美國，因為他們無法忍受在每天都被嘲笑和抨擊中撫養(yǎng)孩子. 給他們貼上同性戀標簽，并不能掩蓋他們的成就和才華. 我欣賞他們走出困境的勇氣，而不是把一切都埋在心底.
致所有認為“LGBT群體正在劫持印度文化”的人：同性戀自古以來就存在于印度。同性戀并不是你經常說的那種新出現(xiàn)的奇怪疾病或千禧一代的基因突變。梨俱吠陀說“看起來不尋常的東西也是自然的”。印度教自由傳統(tǒng)的另一個標志是《愛經》。整整一章都是關于同性戀的，說必須要把同性戀作為一種藝術來享受?！稅劢洝穼ζ渌腥擞杏哪腥藲w為第三種戀愛類型，并指導這種戀愛的XX.
我堅信，像解散377條那樣，最高法院也應該將同性婚姻合法化，因為將同性戀視為一種犯罪顯然是一個西方概念.