久久综合精品国产丝袜长腿中出,国产综合50p,国产午夜三级一区二区三区

Mark de Haan, lives in Exeter, NH
Well as an American I can say I don’t want a merger between Canada and the United States.
Firstly this would be extremely overcomplicated, unnecessary, and would potentially cause mass unrest. Canada is a wealthy and successful nation on its own, why would it desire to join the United States? Our two countries as similar as they are, are distinct, and have separate identities. How would we as Americans accommodate Francophone Canadians, and how would we deal with an extra 34 million Canadians that are now part of the United States? We are deeply in debt, and our government is a mess. I’m sure most Canadians would rather have their peaceful, and not as grid-locked parliament.

作為美國(guó)人，我不希望美國(guó)和加拿大合并
首先，這件事情非常的復(fù)雜，而且沒有必要，很有可能會(huì)造成群眾騷亂。加拿大本身就是一個(gè)富裕和成功的國(guó)家，為什么會(huì)想要加入美國(guó)呢? 我們兩個(gè)國(guó)家雖然相似，但又非常獨(dú)特，有著不同的身份。作為美國(guó)人，我們?cè)撊绾谓蛹{說法語的加拿大人，又該如何處理多出來的3400萬加拿大人? 我們已經(jīng)負(fù)債累累，我們的政府一團(tuán)糟。我肯定大部分加拿大人希望能有一個(gè)和睦的，而不是像美國(guó)那樣陷入僵局的議會(huì)。

Secondly our own country has too many of its own problems to be worrying about. Our country is too polarized to deal with something like that. Roughly one half of the country are conservative, and certainly wouldn’t like the social-democratic attitude of most Canadians when they can’t even get along with the social-democratic attitudes of Americans already living here. Another area for concern would be the large amount of Natives living in Canada. Both our countries have done bad jobs with assisting, and integrating the Natives in both our countries, so why would we in America when we already do a bad job with them want to take in more?

其次，美國(guó)自己有太多的問題需要擔(dān)心，我們國(guó)家兩極分化，無法就合并的事情達(dá)成一致意見。美國(guó)差不多有一半的人都很保守，他們肯定不會(huì)喜歡大部分持社會(huì)民族主義態(tài)度的加拿大人，他們甚至和美國(guó)本土持這種觀念的同胞都相處不好。另一個(gè)令人擔(dān)憂的問題是生活在加拿大的大量原住民。我們兩個(gè)國(guó)家在融合原住民方面做的都很差，既然如此我們?yōu)槭裁催€要接收更多的原住民呢？

Thirdly, I want both our countries to remain distinct. As much as our countries are similar, Canada and America are two special, and separate nations with different backstories, and history. Our ice-hockey rivalry would instantly disappear, and we would end up putting a further imbalance between our two developed nations and those of Mexico, and Central America. There are some things that are quintessentially American, and quintessentially Canadian that wouldn’t be as special anymore if we merged.

第三，我希望我們兩個(gè)國(guó)家能保持不同。雖然我們兩個(gè)國(guó)家有很多相似之處，但加拿大和美國(guó)是兩個(gè)特殊的獨(dú)立國(guó)家，有著不同的歷史。如果我們合并那么我們?cè)诒蛏厦婢蜔o法相互競(jìng)爭(zhēng)了，我們兩國(guó)都是發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家，如果合并，將使我們和墨西哥及中美洲的不平衡進(jìn)一步加劇。如果我們合并，一些屬于加拿大和美國(guó)的獨(dú)特事物就會(huì)消失。

nonymous
I’m sure you can find a few Canadians who would support this, but not very many.
When the US fought the British for independence, the Canadian colonies did not join the fight. And when the Americans achieved independence, some loyalists fled to Canada, which no doubt caused Canada to be less inclined to join the US.

我肯定你可以找到一些支持這個(gè)計(jì)劃的加拿大人，但不會(huì)很多。
在美國(guó)和英國(guó)交戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)取獨(dú)立的時(shí)候，加拿大作為殖民地并沒有參與這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。當(dāng)美國(guó)獲得獨(dú)立時(shí)，一些親英分子逃到了加拿大。這無疑使得當(dāng)時(shí)的加拿大對(duì)加入美國(guó)沒有什么興趣。

The first US constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave Canada an option to join the US if they wanted to, but they didn’t. Maybe there was some sentiment for joining the US, but not enough to make it happen. Then in 1812, there was a war between the US and the UK. Canada, being part of the UK, was theoretically involved, although it’s not clear whether many people living in Canada considered this their fight. But the US did, and invaded Canada, and burned York (now Toronto). Every American knows from school knows that the UK burned the White House and other buildings in Washington in 1814, but for some reason, the schools discreetly fail to mention the US burning of York.

美國(guó)第一部憲法《邦聯(lián)條例》給了加拿大加入美國(guó)的選擇權(quán)，如果他們想要加入的話，現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)是美國(guó)的一部分了，但他們沒有這樣做?；蛟S加拿大對(duì)加入美國(guó)也有一些心動(dòng)，但還不足以讓其成為現(xiàn)實(shí)。然后在1812年，美英之間爆發(fā)了戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。作為英國(guó)的一部分，加拿大理論上也參與了這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，但不清楚是否很多加拿大人認(rèn)為這是屬于他們的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。但美國(guó)人肯定是這樣想的，他們?nèi)肭至思幽么?，焚燒了約克（現(xiàn)在叫多倫多）。每個(gè)美國(guó)人在學(xué)校里都學(xué)過，1814年英國(guó)人焚燒了白宮和華盛頓的其他建筑物，但出于某種原因，學(xué)校沒有告訴大家，美國(guó)也曾焚燒過加拿大的約克。

American conduct in Canada at this time was not well received by the ungrateful Canadians, who for some reason didn’t like having their territory invaded and their capital burnt. This really put Canada off any idea of joining the US, and ever since, the two countries have evolved separately, and people in Canada have formed a distinctive Canadian identity.

當(dāng)時(shí)美國(guó)在加拿大的所作所為不被忘恩負(fù)義的加拿大人所接受，出于某種原因，他們對(duì)自己領(lǐng)土被入侵，首都被焚燒感到憤怒。這讓加拿大打消了加入美國(guó)的念頭，從那以后，兩國(guó)就各自發(fā)展，加拿大人形成了獨(dú)特的加拿大身份認(rèn)同。

The US is already an anomaly, being one of the largest countries in the world. In most such large expanses of territory, people are sufficiently diverse that they feel the need to have separate countries. Look at Europe, for example - it is about 10% larger than the US in area, but divided into more than 40 countries. I don’t see any questions on Quora asking why Europe doesn’t become one big country - the Europeans wouldn’t like it, by a large margin.

美國(guó)作為全球領(lǐng)土最大的國(guó)家之一，已經(jīng)非常的反常，在這樣遼闊的領(lǐng)土上，人們之間有很大的差異性，這足以使他們覺得有必要各自建立自己的國(guó)家。以歐洲為例，它的面積比美國(guó)大約10%，但是歐洲卻有40多個(gè)國(guó)家。我在quora上從來沒有看到人們問為什么歐洲不統(tǒng)一成為一個(gè)大國(guó)，很大程度上歐洲人不喜歡這樣。

They do have the EU, which is less powerful than most central governments, but not all European countries are in it, and one major member just withdrew. So why would anyone expect a large area in North America (together, the US and Canada are larger than Russia, a unified country would be the largest in the world) to be a single country? North America is more linguistically unified than Europe (a large majority have English as their first language, then there are sizeable Spanish and French minorities), but other than that, what do people in British Columbia have in common with people in North Carolina? When you meet someone from California and someone from Newfoundland, can you tell them apart? Even within the US and within Canada, there is considerable regional variation.

他們已經(jīng)有了歐盟，它的權(quán)力沒有大部分國(guó)家的中央政府那么大，并不是所有的歐洲國(guó)家都是歐盟成員國(guó)，剛剛就有一個(gè)大國(guó)退出歐盟。所以為什么會(huì)有人希望北美的這么大一片地區(qū)會(huì)統(tǒng)一成為一個(gè)單一國(guó)家呢（美國(guó)和加拿大合并以后，領(lǐng)土?xí)蕉砹_斯，成為世界第一大國(guó)）？北美在語言上要比歐洲更加統(tǒng)一，大部分人都將英語作為自己的第一語言，還有相當(dāng)一部分少數(shù)民族說西班牙語和法語，但除此以外，不列顛哥倫比亞省的人和北卡羅萊納州的人還有什么其他共同點(diǎn)嗎?

The trend in recent decades has been for large countries to split up (decolonisation, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, the Soviet unx, Sudan, Pakistan) rather than for smaller countries to join up. And for already huge countries like the US and Canada to combine - nothing like that has happened recently. I think Canada or the US having pieces broken off (Quebec in Canada, Texas or California in the US) not very likely, but more likely than the two countries joining up. Where tighter integration does happen, it tends to be in the form of trade agreements and agreements for free movement of people (EU, Australia/New Zealand, proposals for UK/Canada/Australia/New Zealand), rather than political unification. Maybe the US and Canada will make immigration/trade easier, but I doubt they’ll combine politically.

近幾十年來的趨勢(shì)是大國(guó)分裂(去殖民化、捷克斯洛伐克、南斯拉夫、蘇聯(lián)、蘇丹、巴基斯坦)，而不是小國(guó)聯(lián)合。對(duì)于像美國(guó)和加拿大這樣龐大的國(guó)家合并的事情，近來真的沒有先例。雖然我認(rèn)為美國(guó)和加拿大分裂的可能性不大(加拿大的魁北克，美國(guó)的德克薩斯或加利福尼亞)，但這種可能性還是要比兩國(guó)合并的可能性要大一點(diǎn)。更緊密的融合往往是以貿(mào)易協(xié)議和人員自由流動(dòng)的形式實(shí)現(xiàn)的，而不是通過政治統(tǒng)一。也許美國(guó)和加拿大會(huì)讓移民和貿(mào)易變得更加便捷，但我認(rèn)為他們不會(huì)在政治上進(jìn)行統(tǒng)一。

Anonymous
US doesn’t need to ask Canada. Most Canadians love to merge with the great United States. But except for control on oil reserves(tar sands), there’s nothing that Canada could offer.

美國(guó)不需要問加拿大。大部分加拿大人想要和偉大的美國(guó)合并。但除了控制石油儲(chǔ)備以外，加拿大并沒有什么東西可以提供的了。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

Now! if we put oil aside for a moment, the deal is pretty crap(from american point of view). California, Texas, New York, each have economies bigger than Canada’s. Canada only has Tar Sands and Bombardier, and frankly, any mid tier US corporation could buy bombardier in no time. So all that’s left is, Oil. Now!, As for Oil, well!, it certainly would have made a lot of sense for US, but with Shale revolution in US, this take over of Canadian oil by US seem less appetizing.

現(xiàn)在，如果不考慮石油的話，那么這就是一場(chǎng)非常糟糕的交易（從美國(guó)角度來看）。加州，德州，紐約，每一個(gè)的經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)模都要超過加拿大。加拿大只有焦油砂和龐巴迪，但老實(shí)說，任何中等規(guī)模的美國(guó)企業(yè)都可以立刻買下龐巴迪。所以剩下有價(jià)值的就是石油了。至于石油，好吧，它肯定對(duì)美國(guó)很有意義，但隨著美國(guó)頁(yè)巖油革命，接管加拿大石油對(duì)美國(guó)來說似乎也不怎么誘人了

John Smith, A Canadian who has spent lots of time in London.
A Canada-USA merger into one nation will never happen.
The reasons why Canada and the USA are very incompatible are numerous, so I will just touch on a few:

加拿大和美國(guó)永遠(yuǎn)都不會(huì)合并成一個(gè)國(guó)家
美國(guó)和加拿大有很多地方難以調(diào)和，所以我就只說幾點(diǎn)

The "Quebec issue". Quebec is a province of 7-million and largely French-speaking. There is constant strife between Anglo-Canadians and francophones over language rights, equalization treatment and a host of other things. I doubt America will want to inherit this.
Canada is a Parliamentary Monarchy and not prepared to give that up.

“魁北克問題”?？笨耸且粋€(gè)擁有700萬人口的省份，主要講法語。英裔加拿大人和講法語的加拿大人之間一直就語言權(quán)利，平等待遇和其他一系列問題之間存在沖突，我不知道美國(guó)人是否愿意繼承這一切。
加拿大是一個(gè)議會(huì)君主制國(guó)家，而且并不打算放棄這個(gè)制度。

Gun laws. Americans would not appreciate the fact that Canadians prefer to have strict gun-control laws and do not believe in the idea of everyone arming themselves for "protection"
Religion. This is a fairly big one, since Canadians are extremely uncomfortable with the amount of stock Americans place on religion -- especially the way religion enters the political spectrum.
The metric system vs imperial system of measurement.

槍支法律。加拿大人更加喜歡嚴(yán)格的控槍法律，而且他們不相信每個(gè)人應(yīng)該武裝保衛(wèi)自己的理念，這和美國(guó)人之間存在沖突。
宗教。這是一個(gè)相當(dāng)大的問題，因?yàn)榧幽么笕藢?duì)美國(guó)人對(duì)宗教的重視程度感到非常不舒服，特別是宗教進(jìn)入政治光譜的方式。
十進(jìn)制VS英制測(cè)算問題

Dan Sloan
Culturally Canada and the U.S. are moving in different directions anyway. The U.S. is becoming more Latin with California expected to be majority Latino in 15 years while Canada becoming more diverse overall (Chinese in Vancouver, South Asian and Middle Eastern in other parts of the country) so any kind of merger is less and less likely.

在文化上，加拿大和美國(guó)正朝著不同的方向前進(jìn)。美國(guó)正變得越來越拉美化，預(yù)計(jì)15年后加州將以拉美裔為主，而加拿大整體上變得更加多元化（溫哥華的華人，其他地區(qū)有南亞裔和中東移民），因此任何形式合并的可能性變得越來越小。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

Finally, the absorption of Canada would totally upset the political balance in the U.S. Most Canadians are politically left-of-center/centre by U.S. standards and this would give the Democrats a major political advantage. So the Republicans, who are more expansionist by nature, would block any attempt to merge. We don’t seriously consider the statehood of the District of Columbia or Puerto Rico for this reason as well.

最后，美國(guó)在吸收加拿大后，國(guó)內(nèi)的政治會(huì)變得很不平衡。按美國(guó)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來看，大部分加拿大人都是中間偏左的，這會(huì)讓美國(guó)民主黨獲得巨大的政治優(yōu)勢(shì)。所以，即便共和黨人本質(zhì)上更具有擴(kuò)張主義傾向，但他們絕對(duì)不會(huì)允許和加拿大合并。我們之所以沒有嚴(yán)肅考慮接納哥倫比亞和波多黎各就是出于這個(gè)原因。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

Nancy Mills
I like it fine the way it is. It is easy to cross the border and visit friends and enjoy the other side. South of the border, many of us don’t trust either the government or our fellow man enough to willingly give up our right to bear arms. There is enough resistance from rural and traditional Americans that this will probably not change for a long long time. Canadians seem to regard us as gun-toting cowboys.

我喜歡現(xiàn)在這個(gè)樣子?？缭竭吘撤浅Ｈ菀?，美加兩國(guó)的朋友們可以互相看望彼此。在邊境以南，我們?cè)S多人不信任自己的政府，也不相信自己的同胞，不愿意放棄攜帶武器的權(quán)利。來自農(nóng)村保守的美國(guó)人阻力非常大。未來很長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間都無法改變，加拿大人將美國(guó)視為持槍的牛仔

Canadian socialism seems to work up there; I don’t think it would work down here. Too many of us and fanatics about our individual freedoms. Also our government is very corrupt and if we don’t constantly resist it, it will morph into an oligarchy even more horrendous than the one we’ve got. We have a distrust for the government that Canadians do not seem to have. Many Americans would like to live as Canadians. Probably only a minority of Canadians would wish to live as conservative rural Americans.

社會(huì)主義似乎能在加拿大發(fā)揮作用，但我認(rèn)為這在美國(guó)是行不通的。美國(guó)有很多人都是狂熱的個(gè)人自由主義分子，而且我們的政府也非常的腐敗，如果我們不時(shí)時(shí)抵制它，它就會(huì)變成一個(gè)比現(xiàn)在更加可怕的寡頭政治。我們不信任自己的政府，這和加拿大不同。許多美國(guó)人希望能有加拿大人那樣的生活。但希望過保守農(nóng)村美國(guó)人生活的加拿大人恐怕會(huì)很少。

Noel Ward
I live part of the year in Canada and it is a pleasure to be out of the US.
Canada and the US are better —and probably stronger— as separate nation-states.

我一年中有一部分時(shí)間會(huì)呆在加拿大，離開美國(guó)感覺棒極了
加拿大和美國(guó)，不合并，或許會(huì)更好，更強(qiáng)。

Apu Rasmussen
As a Canadian, I must say I am would not be against a merger, but not an unconditional one.
We have many things in common, but I do believe the political situation in the US has major issues…

作為加拿大人，我得說我并不反對(duì)合并，但不是無條件的
我們有很多的共同點(diǎn)，但我認(rèn)為美國(guó)的政治局勢(shì)存在重大問題

Krnx Hoang
The United States has no official language, as an immigrant nation they believe that every should speak what they wish. Go into major cities, there are areas with only korean and Chinese signs

美國(guó)沒有官方語言，作為一個(gè)移民國(guó)家，他們認(rèn)為每個(gè)人可以想說什么語言就說什么語言。去大城市看看，有些地方只有韓文和中文標(biāo)志

James Kennedy
This is all very 19th century wishing. It's way too late and will never happen.
If it HAD happened it would have been great - imagine the entire continent as one big unified country (not including Mexico of course).

這是19世紀(jì)的心愿，現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)太遲了，美加永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)合并了
如果真的合并了，那就太好了，想象一下整塊大陸都成了一個(gè)統(tǒng)一國(guó)家（當(dāng)然墨西哥不包括在內(nèi)）。

如果美國(guó)要求加拿大和自己合并，加拿大會(huì)同意嗎？

如果美國(guó)要求加拿大和自己合并，加拿大會(huì)同意嗎？