《流浪地球》IMDB影評：有驚喜但也不乏俗套，較真吐槽，善意期待中國更多科幻電影
IMDB:The Wandering Earth（2019）
譯文簡介
網(wǎng)友：這部電影向觀眾提了一個嚴(yán)肅的問題：面對我們文明不可避免的、不可抗拒的災(zāi)難，你打算怎么做？電影中的所有角色都是普通人，每個人都以閃亮的人性給出了答案。盡管困難重重，但沒有人會在尚未抗?fàn)幹熬颓?
超較真網(wǎng)友：需要全世界核武器總量的1萬多倍才能將地球的速度改變幾乎毫無用處的1米/秒或2.25英里/小時！像宇宙飛船一樣移動地球太愚蠢了！
正文翻譯
評分：5.9
Storyline
故事情節(jié)
故事情節(jié)
As the sun is dying out, people all around the world build giant planet thrusters to move Earth out of its orbit and sail Earth to a new star system. Yet the 2500-year journey comes with unexpected dangers, and in order to save humanity, a group of young people in this age of a wandering Earth fight hard for the survival of humankind.
隨著太陽逐漸消亡，世界各地的人們建造了巨大的行星推進(jìn)器，將地球移出軌道，駛向一個新的恒星系統(tǒng)。然而，持續(xù)2500年的旅程遇到了了意想不到的危險，為了拯救人類，一群年輕人在這個流浪地球的時代為人類的生存而努力奮斗。
隨著太陽逐漸消亡，世界各地的人們建造了巨大的行星推進(jìn)器，將地球移出軌道，駛向一個新的恒星系統(tǒng)。然而，持續(xù)2500年的旅程遇到了了意想不到的危險，為了拯救人類，一群年輕人在這個流浪地球的時代為人類的生存而努力奮斗。
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 5 )
收藏
The main characters suck.
主角很爛。
Warning: Spoilers
I'm just going to be blunt here: The main characters suck. The main protagonists, a brother and a sister, are depthless and one dimensional. The sister literally spends 90% of her lines crying or shouting for someone to save her. The brother is arrogant and apparently a "genius", yet seems to have no redeeming qualities. Overall, the story and CGI are decent,
409 out of 503 found this helpful.
劇透警告
我準(zhǔn)備在這里直言不諱：主角很爛。主人公這兩兄妹是膚淺且扁平化。妹妹簡直是用90%的臺詞來哭著喊著讓別人來救她。哥哥傲慢且貌似是一個“天才”，然而看著沒有任何可取的品質(zhì)。
總得來說，這個故事和CG特效是不錯的，但是人物形象還有很大的進(jìn)步空間。
Incredible effects, unlikable characters, confusing story line
不可思議的特效，不受喜歡的角色，令人困惑的故事情節(jié)。
Went in with big expectations as a fan of Liu Cixin's Three Body Problem. Have not read Wandering Earth, so can't compare, but perhaps reading it would have made the movie easier to follow. Outside of Wu Jing, the main characters in general were hard to like, especially his son Liu Qi and adopted daughter, Duoduo, both acting like petulant children. Expected high levels of cheesiness, but the jokes fell flat and the emotional tear jerking scenes were milked dry. While you should go into a sci-fi with an open-mind, temporarily suspending reality, this had hole after hole and jumped all over the place. At one point, one of the special force team members suddenly fell on his face - he froze to death for no apparent reason. Kind of summed up the movie. While I am sure the novel is as unique as anything Liu Cixin has written, the movie is a lesser version of Armegeddon, lacking the fun, character building (I know, I am talking about a Michael Bay movie) and star power. Did enjoy seeing a Chinese perspective and wasn't overly nationalistic like Wu Jing's former Wolf Warrior. Living in Shanghai, was also fun seeing the city and the rest of the country highlighted as it fell beneath natural disasters, joining NYC, Paris, London and the rest of the major cities that regularly are destroyed for popcorn munching sake. China continues to head in the right direction when it comes to great movie making and hope it continues. If anything, this has me heading out tomorrow to buy Wandering Earth, the novel.
216 out of 286 found this helpful.
作為劉慈欣的《三體》的粉絲，我?guī)е鴺O大的期待進(jìn)影院。沒有讀過《流浪地球》，所以無法比較，但也許讀過它會更容易理解這部電影。除了吳京，多數(shù)主要人物都很難讓人喜歡，尤其是他的兒子劉啟和養(yǎng)女朵朵，兩人都表現(xiàn)得像愛耍性子的孩子。預(yù)計到會非常俗套，但沒想到包袱全都沒抖響，還在絞勁腦汁地展現(xiàn)煽情催淚的場面。雖然你應(yīng)該以開放的心態(tài)去看科幻電影，暫時擱置現(xiàn)實，但整部電影都接二連三地出現(xiàn)漏洞。有一幕，一名特種部隊隊員突然摔倒在地——他無緣無故地凍死了。這就像是電影的總結(jié)。
雖然我相信這部小說和劉慈欣寫的任何一部小說一樣獨(dú)特，但這部電影就是《絕世天劫》的翻版，缺乏趣味、性格塑造（我知道我說的是邁克爾·貝的電影）和明星魅力。我喜歡看到中國人的視角，而不是吳京上一部《戰(zhàn)狼》那樣過于的民族主義。作為生活在上海的人，看到這座城市和這個國家的其他地方與紐約、巴黎、倫敦和其他經(jīng)常因吃爆米花而被摧毀的主要城市一樣因為遭受自然災(zāi)害被萬眾矚目，也感到非常有趣。在制作偉大的電影方面，中國持續(xù)地朝著正確的方向前進(jìn)，我希望希望它能繼續(xù)下去。如果要說看完這部電影有什么改變我的東西，那就是我明天要去買《流浪地球》這本小說。
Overly ambitious, laughably implausible, clumsily edited mess
過于野心勃勃，難以置信的可笑，剪輯拙劣的爛攤子
The Wandering Earth is an overly ambitious, laughably implausible, thoroughly confusing, clumsily edited mess. The plot runs amok with too many hollow characters making stupid decisions without reason. Action sequences were so badly shot and edited it was hard to figure out what was going on. The CGI varied from passable to worse than a 90's video game. Acting was stilted and expressionless. Dialog was rambling and inefficient with an overuse of weird computer voices to explain what was going on. By the end I couldn't care less about the characters and fell sleep. The filmmaker's intention to build a sci-fi epic were noble but lacked the budget, talent and experience to pull it off. 3/10.
208 out of 289 found this helpful.
《流浪地球》是一部過于野心勃勃、荒謬可笑、非常迷惑、剪輯拙劣的爛片。這部電影情節(jié)混亂，無數(shù)空洞的角色無緣無故做出愚蠢的決定。動作鏡頭的拍攝和剪輯非常糟糕，很難弄清楚到底發(fā)生了什么。CG特效有的還可以的，也有的比90年代的電子游戲更差。表演生硬且呆板。對話雜亂無章，信息表達(dá)低效，過度使用奇怪的計算機(jī)聲音來解釋發(fā)生了什么。到最后，我完全不關(guān)心劇中的角色并且睡著了。這位電影人制作科幻史詩的意圖是偉大的，但缺乏預(yù)算、天賦和經(jīng)驗來完成。3/10.
Absurd fantasy nonsense
荒謬的幻想
Moving earth like a space ship is so dumb! 1) An asteroid that hits the earth and kills all the dinosaurs, didn't budge the earth from it's orbit. 2) The moon creation even that suggests that 4.5b years ago an obxt the size of Mars collided with the earth to create the moon. Yet it didn't budge the earth from it's orbit around the Sun. 3) The Mass of the earth is 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg. the force required to move that obxt 1meter per second is Force = Mass * Acceleration. or 6 * 10^24 newtons. So to change the speed of the earth by a nearly useless 1m/s or 2.25 MPH, would require the energy of 142 million megatons of TNT. Over 10,000 times the total amount of all the worlds nuclear weapons. Or in other words if we detonated every single nuke in the world in the same place at the time that would be enough to budge the earth .000225 MPH or 14 inches per hour. 4) Even if there was an energy source that abundant to move the earth to Jupiter much less another star light years away, we would simply not need a star at all. We could just set the earth to a further orbit from the sun, and use all that propulsion energy to substitute for the sun. 5) Lets be ridiculously generous and say the earth could reach Jupiter in 1 year 365,000,000 miles away, that would very roughly equate to a speed of 41,000 mph (which is way faster than the 14" per hour all the nukes in the world could move the earth). To travel to our next nearest star (alpha centauri) is 25 trillion miles away, that would take 70,000 years, or if we used the 14" per hour speed it would take 17,580 billion earth years. 6) The Hiroshima nuclear blast was 20ktons of TNT. So imagine what 700,000 of those would do to the surface and atmosphere of the Earth. And that's to move 14" an hour.
351 out of 513 found this helpful.
像宇宙飛船一樣移動地球太愚蠢了！
1）一顆撞擊地球并殺死所有恐龍的小行星沒有使地球偏離軌道。
2）月球的形成甚至表明，45億年前，一個火星大小的物體與地球相撞，形成了月球。然而，它并沒有改變地球繞太陽運(yùn)行的軌道。
3）地球的質(zhì)量是6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000公斤。每秒移動地球一米所需的力是：力=質(zhì)量*加速度，6*10^24牛頓。因此，要將地球的速度改變幾乎毫無用處的1米/秒或2.25英里/小時，需要1.42億噸TNT的能量。這是全世界核武器總量的1萬多倍。或者換句話說，如果我們在同一時間在同一地點(diǎn)引爆世界上的每一枚核彈，足以使地球以每小時0.000225英里或每小時14英寸的速度移動。
4）如果有足夠的能量將地球移動到木星甚至距離我們幾光年遠(yuǎn)的另一顆恒星，我們也根本不需要恒星。我們可以把地球置于離太陽更遠(yuǎn)的軌道上，用所有的推進(jìn)能量來代替太陽。
5）讓我們荒唐地大方地決定，地球要在1年內(nèi)到達(dá)365000000英里以外的木星，那這大致相當(dāng)于41000英里/小時的速度（比世界上所有核武器可以移動地球的每小時14英寸要快得多），而要到達(dá)的距離我們最近的恒星（半人馬座阿爾法星）在25萬億英里遠(yuǎn)的地方，需要70000年，如果我們使用每小時14英寸的速度，需要175800億地球年。
6）廣島核爆炸相當(dāng)于2萬噸TNT。想象一下，70萬個這樣的核導(dǎo)彈會對地球表面和大氣層造成什么影響。而且這也僅僅就是每小時移動14英寸。
Devoid of realism, but still rather enjoyable...
沒有現(xiàn)實主義，但仍然很有趣……
I finally had the chance to sit down and watch the 2019 Chinese movie "The Wandering Earth" (aka "Liu lang di qui") here in 2020. I had heard about the movie, of course, but just never gotten around to actively sitting down to watch it.
So was the wait worth it? Oh yeah. This movie was definitely an epic Chinese production, and the movie was very enjoyable. Sure, you need to fully forget everything about realism, science and probability. This was without a doubt a very entertaining and enjoyable sci-fi adventure, but there was not an ounce of realism in the movie. But hey, hence the purpose of being a movie meant for entertainment and not enlightenment of facts.
I was really surprised with the epic feel that there was to this movie. This easily outdid a lot of Hollywood produced movies. And I was really enjoying the CGI, the props, the sets, the costumes, etc. While the movie failed to have a single ounce of realism in it, it more than made up for that in terms of visuals and pure eye candy.
The storyline was fully and wholeheartedly unrealistic, but it was entertaining. "The Wandering Earth" is a very, very predictable movie, and you knew exactly what would happen a long time before it transpired on the screen. But this overly predictable formula really wasn't a hindrance to the movie.
"The Wandering Earth" also had a good ensemble of casted actors and actresses, whom portrayed their respective characters quite well. And that definitely also contributed a great deal to the overall enjoyment of the movie.
All in all, "The Wandering Earth" was an all-round pleasing movie, and I was more than entertained with it. I am rating it a seven out of ten stars.
10 out of 11 found this helpful.
2020年，我終于有機(jī)會在這里坐下來觀看2019年的中國電影《流浪地球》。當(dāng)然，我聽說過這部電影，但還沒有主動坐下來看過。
那么等待是否值得呢？是的。這部電影絕對是一部史詩般的中國作品，而且讓人非常愉快。當(dāng)然，你需要完全忘記關(guān)于現(xiàn)實主義、科學(xué)和概率的一切。毫無疑問，這是一次非常有趣的科幻冒險，但電影中沒有一丁點(diǎn)現(xiàn)實主義。但是，嘿，這就是電影的目的，它是為了娛樂，而不是為了啟示真實。
我對這部電影的史詩般的感覺感到非常驚訝。它輕松地超過了許多好萊塢制作的電影。我真的很喜歡它的CG特效、道具、布景、服裝等等。雖然這部電影沒有一丁點(diǎn)的真實感，但它在視覺效果和純粹的賞心悅目方面彌補(bǔ)了這一點(diǎn)。
故事情節(jié)完全不切實際，但很有趣?！读骼说厍颉肥且徊糠浅?、非?？深A(yù)測的電影，在屏幕上展現(xiàn)出來之前你已經(jīng)知道要發(fā)生什么了。但這個過于可預(yù)測的公式并不是電影的障礙。
《流浪地球》也擁有一個很好的演員團(tuán)隊，他們認(rèn)真地刻畫了角色。而這無疑使我能夠更好地享受這部電影。
總得來說，《流浪地球》是個全方面讓人喜歡的電影，我無比享受這部電影。我給它七分。
Quote: "If you drive unsafe your family will cry"
引用：“行車不規(guī)范，親人兩行淚?！?/b>
"If you drive unsafe your family will cry", this is a line from the movie, I bet the original Chinese text was far better then this translation, but that's what we have to deal with. In stead of doing a decent job the translation is terrible, so with this movie you got the choice, go with the terrible dubbed English language or go for the far more terrible subtitles. So it is possible I watched a masterpiece, but never know because of the translation.
For the movie, the cgi is not bad, not great, but good enough. The actors, well I couldn't care if they live or die. The action, well, remember "Armageddon", there all the action scenes were great, but made no sense at all so unrealistic were they, This is the same, totally unbelievable actions but you should not care one bit of that. About stealing from other movies, it seams this movie has bits of every disaster movie from the last decades in it. Plot holes are also to many to name, if you are sensitive for that you definitely should not watch. Bottom line, if you want a brainless flick with much action and cgi, then this movie is for you.
22 out of 28 found this helpful.
“如果你開車不安全，你的家人會哭的”，這是電影中的一句臺詞，我打賭中文原文比這篇譯文要好得多，而這是我們必須處理的問題。翻譯不是很好，沒有做好本土化，所以看這部電影時，你可以選擇使用糟糕的配音英語，或者選擇更糟糕的字幕。所以我有可能看了一部杰作，但因為翻譯的原因我永遠(yuǎn)不得而知。
對于這部電影來說，CG特效不算差也不算好，但也足夠用了。演員，好吧，我完全不在意他們是死了還是活著。動作，呃，想想《絕世天劫》，所有的動作都不錯，但是沒有一次是有意義的，這部電影也是一樣，全部都是不可思議的動作戲但是你一點(diǎn)都不關(guān)心這些。說到從別的電影里面抄襲，看上去它有過去幾十年每一部災(zāi)難片的影子。情節(jié)漏洞數(shù)不勝數(shù)，如果你對這個很敏感那么絕對不要去看?？傊绻阆肟匆徊縿幼骱虲G特效都很豐富的無腦電影，那么這部電影適合你。
Epic Science Fiction Movie
史詩般的科幻電影
Just watched the IMAX 3D movie. Trust me, don't do it any other way. Imagine ten of thousands of fusion thrusters are pushing our planet away from a dying sun on a IMAX screen. The visual effect is impressive and goes well with the story. The story is not everyday Hollywood style: Superhero saves the day; everyone else is there to give a round of applause. This movie brings a serious question to the audience: What are you gonna do facing an unavoidable, irresistible disaster to our civilization? All characters in the movie are ordinary people and everyone gives their answer with shining humanity. Against all the odds no one gives in without a good fight. The chance of success is close to zero but they choose hope. All the efforts add up and make impossible nothing. It is a Sci-Fi fan's feast you dont want to miss.
489 out of 841 found this helpful.
剛剛看了IMAX 3D版的電影。相信我，不要以任何其他方式觀看它。想象一下，成千上萬的核聚變推進(jìn)器正在IMAX屏幕上將我們的星球從垂死的太陽附件推開。視覺效果令人印象深刻，與故事相得益彰。這個故事不是常見的好萊塢風(fēng)格：超級英雄拯救了這一天，其他人都在那里鼓掌。這部電影向觀眾提了一個嚴(yán)肅的問題：面對我們文明不可避免的、不可抗拒的災(zāi)難，你打算怎么做？電影中的所有角色都是普通人，每個人都以閃亮的人性給出了答案。盡管困難重重，但沒有人會在尚未抗?fàn)幹熬颓?。成功的機(jī)會幾乎為零，但他們選擇了希望。所有的努力加起來，就沒有不可能完成的事情。這是一場你不想錯過的科幻迷盛宴。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Disappointing
失望
Being a fan of Liu Cixin (three body trilogy) I wanted to like this movie but I found it impossible to do so. Bad acting, bad scxt, bad jokes, confusing plot, people who make stupid decisions because they love their family more than humanity, incorrect science, annoying characters, trying to make you cry about ten times at the end when I don't care about anyone in their stupid family. I'm still going to read the book though because I don't think it can be this bad. It is encouraging to see China try big movies like this but still a long way to go.
70 out of 102 found this helpful.
作為劉慈欣（《三體》）的粉絲，我想喜歡這部電影，但我發(fā)現(xiàn)做不到。糟糕的表演，糟糕的劇本，糟糕的笑話，混亂的情節(jié)，那些因為愛家人而不是人類所以做出愚蠢決定的人，錯誤的科學(xué)，令人討厭的角色，試圖讓你哭十次但其實我不關(guān)心他們愚蠢的家庭中的任何一個人。不過我還是要讀這本書，因為我覺得它不會這么糟糕。看到中國嘗試這樣的大型電影令人鼓舞，但仍有很長的路要走。
Not bad, but can be much better
不差，但是可以更好
1. Background settings have great imagination. Very romantic in some way. (??????????) 2. Visual effects is wonderful (and made by Chinese, not easy) (?????????) 3. Plot not good. The director didn't handle to tell the story well. Rhythm is weird. Plot is not mind-catching. (?????) 4. Ideas are too narrow. The main roles take family relation more seriously than human survival. And they didn't respect rules. (???) 5. Emotional expressions not natural. Lines are awkward. Too much 'tear points' but got little touching. (????)
156 out of 243 found this helpful.
1.背景設(shè)置很有想象力。在某種程度上非常浪漫。（十星）
2.視覺效果很棒（而且是中國制造的，不容易）（九星）
3.情節(jié)不好。導(dǎo)演沒有把故事講好，節(jié)奏很奇怪，情節(jié)并不引人入勝。（五星）
4.觀念太狹隘。主要角色比起人類生存更重視家庭關(guān)系，他們不尊重規(guī)則。（三星）
5.情感表達(dá)不自然。臺詞很別扭，太多的“淚點(diǎn)”卻沒有多少觸動。（四星）
A typical Hollywood doomsday movie, but poorly acted
一部典型的好萊塢末日電影，但做得不行
The movie is groundbreaking for China in that the special effects are impressive and that it shows they can do sci-fi in design. Sadly, aside from that, there's not much to like about the movie.
To put into context first, Wandering Earth cannot be compared to a Marvel or DC Comics movie nor to most sci-fi movies: they are completely different genres and are much less likely to involve human cooperation. At it's core Wandering Earth is a 'doomsday' or 'disaster' movie. It should be compared to movies like: The Day After Tomorrow; Armageddon; Deep Impact; Outbreak; Contagion; etc.
In that context, Wandering Earth has a very basic, standard plot. The characters are similar, except exaggerated and over the top. Together, aside from the usual interdepartment and/or international disagreements and eventual cooperation that can be found in such disaster movies, the plot and characters sum up to: "Young, handsome rebel who hates his dad (unreasonably) and acts selfishly in all but the final moments ends up a hero".
The acting is weak. Character motivations are vague and often elaborated on only at the moment of death or near death (eg. through flashbacks), so there is no bonding with the characters on the way there. The main character swings back and forth between wanting to sacrifice all humanity to selfishly save his own friends and family (which would be very temporary) and wanting to sacrifice other people's lives to save all humanity. There is zero chance of ever feeling any connection or sympathy with that character. Potentially moving/touching moments are ruined by the way-too-obvious comedic relief characters (eg. watch someone important die, then laugh because the guy with white hair did something silly). The 'action' arc is "intro - climax - climax - climax - climax - climax - climax - conclusion" to the point that the climax just feels like it's dragging on and on.
Worst of all: There is an amazing sci-fi premise that is pulled off spectactularly with the special effects, but it amounts to nothing. It is the backdrop for just another disaster movie.
149 out of 233 found this helpful.
這部電影對中國來說是開創(chuàng)性的，因為它的特效令人印象深刻，這表明他們在技術(shù)上有能力做科幻。可悲的是，除此之外，這部電影沒有太多值得喜歡的地方。
首先，《流浪地球》不能與漫威、DC漫畫電影甚至大多數(shù)科幻電影相提并論：它們是完全不同的類型，這些電影不怎么涉及人類合作?！读骼说厍颉返暮诵氖且徊磕┤掌驗?zāi)難片。它應(yīng)該與以下電影進(jìn)行比較：《后天》《絕世天劫》《彗星撞地球》《極度恐慌》《傳染病》等。
在這種背景下，《流浪地球》有一個非?；镜摹?biāo)準(zhǔn)的情節(jié)。除了夸張和放大外，它們的角色都很相似。對比著看，在這樣的災(zāi)難片中除了可以找到常見的部門間或國際的分歧以及最終的合作之外，情節(jié)和人物總結(jié)為：“年輕、英俊的叛逆者討厭他的父親（沒有原因），除了最終時刻，其他所有時侯都自私地行事，最終成為了英雄”。
表演很差。角色的動機(jī)是模糊的，通常只在死亡或瀕死的那一刻（比如通過閃回）進(jìn)行詳細(xì)描述，因此在進(jìn)程中和角色沒有共情。主人公在犧牲全人類自私地拯救自己的朋友和家人（這將是非常暫時的）與犧牲他們的生命來拯救全人類之間來回?fù)u擺。你對這個角色沒有任何共鳴或同情。太明顯的喜劇角色破壞了潛在的淚點(diǎn)/燃點(diǎn)（比如，當(dāng)看到一個重要人物死去時，因為這人有一頭白發(fā)且做過一些傻事而大笑）?！靶袆印被∈恰伴_場-高潮-高潮-高潮-高潮-高潮-高潮-高潮-結(jié)尾”，導(dǎo)致高潮像是在不斷拖沓。
最糟糕的是：因為一個通過特效實現(xiàn)了神奇的科幻前提，但它并沒有什么意義。它僅僅是一個災(zāi)難電影的背景。