網(wǎng)友討論：中國(guó)打造人工智能核潛艇
China Building Artificial Intelligence for Nuclear Submarines
譯文簡(jiǎn)介
中國(guó)海軍正在將機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)算法納入其潛艇技術(shù)，它們旨在幫助潛艇指揮官做出更好的決策。機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)人工智能可以演繹大量數(shù)據(jù)，識(shí)別威脅，并提供不同的選項(xiàng)。
正文翻譯
The Chinese Navy is incorporating machine learning algorithms into its submarine technology. They are intended to help submarine commanders make better decisions. Mahcine learning AI can interpret large volumes of data, identify threats, and propose different options.
?
中國(guó)海軍正在將機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)算法納入其潛艇技術(shù)，它們旨在幫助潛艇指揮官做出更好的決策。機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)人工智能可以演繹大量數(shù)據(jù)，識(shí)別威脅，并提供不同的選項(xiàng)。
評(píng)論翻譯
很贊 ( 4 )
收藏
They r innovating…
他們正在創(chuàng)新...
Btw u forgot to ask last video but what are ur thoughts on the Zui Hai Yun (drone ship) that was recently launched in China - u can type the name (as written above) and will see the ship and it’s design - very interesting and would be worth ur assessment if AI/Drones become a staple in Chinese naval warfare
這種類(lèi)型的應(yīng)用如果成功且準(zhǔn)確，將是所有海戰(zhàn)理論和所有類(lèi)型的船只使用人工智能的一個(gè)重要轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn)--感謝上帝，仍然存在人類(lèi)的否決權(quán)--因?yàn)槿斯ぶ悄艿娜魏握`判都可能導(dǎo)致意外的交火或更糟糕的事情......
另外，你忘了問(wèn)最后一個(gè)視頻，但你對(duì)最近在中國(guó)下水的“珠海云”（無(wú)人機(jī)船）有什么看法 - 你可以輸入名字（如上面寫(xiě)的），就會(huì)看到這艘船和它的設(shè)計(jì) - 非常有趣，如果人工智能/無(wú)人機(jī)成為中國(guó)海戰(zhàn)的主力，將值得你評(píng)估。
China never fails to amaze with thier advancements in innovation and technology
中國(guó)在創(chuàng)新和技術(shù)方面的進(jìn)步總是令人驚嘆!
I fail to have anything to say other than “wow”
A reduction in crew is one thing - but to use AI in such a way that it becomes part of the subs systems never crossed my mind
除了 "哇 "之外，我沒(méi)有什么可說(shuō)的。
減少船員是一回事--但以這樣一種方式使用人工智能，使其成為潛艇系統(tǒng)的一部分，我從未想過(guò)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
@hugh mungus the reduction of human life/troops being risked means what ur suggesting is probably the way they are going/thinking of developing the navy but the cost of this would be hundreds of billions to fully integrate the technology to a level where it is sufficiently autonomous but without having to worry that it would cause a war by calculating that a pre-emptive is the safer bet
Human veto is vital in all these scenarios as a fully capable AI (emphasis on the I) with an understanding of warfare and and given authority/autonomy is a really fuckin dangerous concept - some skynet shit
減少人類(lèi)生命/軍隊(duì)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)意味著你所建議的可能是他們要/正在考慮的發(fā)展海軍的方式，但其成本將是數(shù)以千億計(jì)的，以充分整合技術(shù)，使其具有足夠的自主性，但不必?fù)?dān)心它會(huì)引起戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，因?yàn)橛?jì)算出先發(fā)制人是更安全的選擇。
在所有這些情況下，人類(lèi)的否決權(quán)是至關(guān)重要的，因?yàn)橐粋€(gè)完全有能力的人工智能（強(qiáng)調(diào)I）對(duì)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的理解，并給予權(quán)力/自主權(quán)是一個(gè)非常他媽的危險(xiǎn)的概念 - 一些關(guān)于天網(wǎng)的胡說(shuō)八道
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Hey, thanks for your great comment - agree that a human veto is always needed for a platform so potentially destructive.
The drone ship that you mentioned is something I have not looked deeply into, but have taken notice. Again, I probably need to read more on this before giving a considered comment. But, on the surface, it looks to be a fairly small vessel for launching light drones, and has autonomous AI piloting. These drones are probably used for surveillance and/or research purposes. That said, in recent years there has of course been talks of how large swarms of small cheap drones can overwhelm expensive combat assets, such as fighter jets and naval ships, because of how expensive the latter two has become over time. So, there is a remote possibility that the PLAN may be experimenting with that line of naval warfare, and this ship is the manifestation of that. But, my best guess for now is surveillance and research.
嘿，謝謝你的精彩評(píng)論--同意人類(lèi)對(duì)如此具有潛在破壞性的平臺(tái)總是需要否決的說(shuō)法。
你提到的無(wú)人船，我還沒(méi)有深入研究，但已經(jīng)注意到了。同樣，我可能需要在給予深思熟慮的評(píng)論之前閱讀更多這方面的資料。但是，從表面上看，它似乎是一個(gè)相當(dāng)小的船只，用于發(fā)射輕型無(wú)人機(jī)，并且有自主的AI駕駛。這些無(wú)人機(jī)可能被用于監(jiān)視和/或研究目的。話(huà)雖如此，近年來(lái)當(dāng)然也有談?wù)摯笮托⌒土畠r(jià)無(wú)人機(jī)群如何壓倒昂貴的戰(zhàn)斗資產(chǎn)，如戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)和海軍艦艇，因?yàn)楹髢烧唠S著時(shí)間的推移已經(jīng)變得非常昂貴。因此，解放軍有一種極小的可能性，即解放軍可能正在試驗(yàn)這種海戰(zhàn)路線(xiàn)，而這艘船就是其表現(xiàn)形式。但是，我現(xiàn)在最好的猜測(cè)是監(jiān)視和研究。
Considering they're already talking about an unmanned replacement for the Type022 I can reasonably immagine a fleet of drone FAS being accompanied by some kind of refueler/mothership as a kind of mini carrier battlegroup.
考慮到他們已經(jīng)在談?wù)?22型無(wú)人駕駛替代物，我可以合理地想象一支由某種加油機(jī)/母艦伴隨，作為一種小型航母戰(zhàn)斗群的無(wú)人機(jī)FAS艦隊(duì)。
If you think AI is a bad idea because it takes away the human factor in submarine operation, I want to you to do a minute by minute review of how the USS Connecticut ran into an underwater mountain. Everyone on that boat got fired because everyone made mistakes.
如果你認(rèn)為人工智能是一個(gè)壞主意，因?yàn)樗鼊儕Z了潛艇操作中的人為因素，我想讓你逐分鐘回顧一下康涅狄格號(hào)是如何撞上一座水下山的。那艘船上的每個(gè)人都被解雇了，因?yàn)槊總€(gè)人都犯了錯(cuò)誤。
cant wait for videos on 075 and pakistan version of 054ap. if you could do ground forces as well it would be amazing.
迫不及待地想看到075和巴基斯坦版054AP的視頻。如果你能把地面部隊(duì)也做出來(lái)，那就太了不起了。
J D
This is absolutely the way forward in the long run, they’ll be problems and setbacks, though ultimately , it’ll be more than fruitful!
從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)來(lái)看，這絕對(duì)是前進(jìn)的道路，盡管他們會(huì)遇到問(wèn)題和挫折，但最終會(huì)有更多的成果！"。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Well done China. Built by China.
中國(guó)干得好。中國(guó)制造。
Can't wait for them to develop an unmanned sub.
迫不及待地想讓他們開(kāi)發(fā)出無(wú)人駕駛潛艇。
AI in a submarine is fine, it's when you install a 3D printer in the kitchen that problems start...
潛艇中的人工智能是沒(méi)有問(wèn)題的，但當(dāng)你在廚房中安裝3D打印機(jī)時(shí)，問(wèn)題就開(kāi)始了。
Does China have anything E-4…E-6 and E-8?? Especially the first 2
中國(guó)有什么E-4...E-6和E-8嗎？特別是前兩個(gè)
China will protect south China sea
中國(guó)將保護(hù)南中國(guó)海
I am not sure - hopefully someone else can fill you in. I know that China does not yet have something fully equivalent to the E-2 Hawkeye, at least not in the carrier compatible sense. It does have the KJ-500, but this is land-only. It is developing the carrier-capable KJ-600, which once finished will be comparable to the E-2
我不確定--希望其他人能告訴你。我知道中國(guó)還沒(méi)有完全等同于E-2鷹眼的東西，至少在航母兼容的意義上沒(méi)有。它確實(shí)有KJ-500，但這只是陸地上的。它正在開(kāi)發(fā)具有航母能力的KJ-600，一旦完成將可以與E-2相媲美。
HAL will take out all trespassers
HAL（印度斯坦航空公司）將干掉所有的入侵者
It will change the game alright. But not all change is good. The future will prove me right, this is a very bad idea.
"Humanity has ruled this world like stumbling, demented, child king long enough" Alice Cooper from the introduction to Black widow, Welcome to my nightmare.
這將改變游戲的好壞。但不是所有的變化都是好的。未來(lái)將證明我是對(duì)的，這是個(gè)非常糟糕的主意。
“人類(lèi)已經(jīng)像蹣跚學(xué)步、精神錯(cuò)亂、兒童國(guó)王一樣統(tǒng)治這個(gè)世界足夠長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間了”愛(ài)麗絲庫(kù)珀從黑寡婦的介紹中學(xué)到的，歡迎來(lái)到我的噩夢(mèng)。
China: Take only your own.
America: The world is mine
中國(guó)：只拿你自己的。
美國(guó)：世界是我的。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處