為什么英國(guó)和中國(guó)的軍事實(shí)力比美國(guó)弱？是因?yàn)橘|(zhì)量不夠還是數(shù)量不夠？

Peter Kaye
Nope it’s your lack of knowledge, seems like your one of the brainwashed yanks that thinks the USA is supreme, BUT, for your information, it’s all just a dream, the USA with SIX other countries helping them couldn’t even beat a tiny country like Vietnam, AND EVEN AFTER TWENTY YEARS, still had their arses kicked by a bunch of goat herders in Afghanistan. Ran like a bunch of sissies, I would suggest the USA are one of the weakest military on the planet, yes you have a lot of equipment but most of it is outdated and falling apart, Uk, military is very well trained an tough, as they proved in various military games against the US, and China? Far FAR to modern for the US, to even touch them, it’s doesn’t matter how good you THINK your military is, words and fantasy do NOT win wars.

不對(duì)，這是你的無(wú)知?？雌饋?lái)你是那些被洗腦的人之一，認(rèn)為美國(guó)至高無(wú)上，但是，你參考一下，這一切只是一個(gè)夢(mèng)想。美國(guó)與其他六個(gè)國(guó)家一起，甚至無(wú)法擊敗像越南這樣的小國(guó)。以至于在二十年后，他們?nèi)匀槐话⒏缓沟囊蝗耗裂蛉舜虻寐浠魉?。像一群膽小鬼一樣逃跑。我?huì)說(shuō)美國(guó)是地球上最弱的軍事力量之一，是的，你們有很多裝備，但其中大部分已經(jīng)過(guò)時(shí)并且沒啥大威力。英國(guó)的軍隊(duì)接受了很好的訓(xùn)練，非常強(qiáng)悍，正如他們?cè)谂c美國(guó)進(jìn)行的各種軍事比賽中證明的那樣。至于中國(guó)？對(duì)于美國(guó)來(lái)說(shuō)，他們比之前現(xiàn)代太多了，根本無(wú)法對(duì)抗。你認(rèn)為你的軍隊(duì)有多強(qiáng)大并不重要，YY和幻想并不能贏得戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。

Robert Vannrox
Related
Is the United States military better than the Chinese?
From 1950 until 1953, this question was answered.
When the “Korean War” broke out, the North pretty much seized most of Korea, and then the United States led Allied forces entered the conflict.
The Allied forces won battle after battle, pushing the Northern forces back, and back, and back. It was one victory after the other. The American led forces pushed the North Korean forces up to the Chinese border.
When the Allied forces, led by the United States, crossed into China, and started bombing China… China got involved.
From the moment that China got involved, the tide of the war was reversed. And after battle after battle, the Chinese won. The month by month situation plainly shows this onslaught of non-stop Chinese victories against the United States.
The United States sued for peace, and agreed to leave. They left in a (classic) rout. With military installations abandoned in haste, and military depots bombed remotely via Naval bombardment.
All in all, at that time, the United States was at the height of power, and global influence, and it lost to China. Not just “l(fā)ost”, but had to retreat in a most undignified manner. The United States suffered a defeat that was spectacular.
Is the United States military better than the PLA?
No one knows.
We can only use history as a guide.
And in doing so, we clearly see that the Chinese PLA fought the United States and won. It is up to the reader to determine, for themselves if Chinese PLA forces are weaker today than in 1950, and whether the American military is stronger today than in 1950.
What was the “Korean War” like?

相關(guān)討論
美國(guó)軍隊(duì)比中國(guó)軍隊(duì)更強(qiáng)嗎？
從1950年到1953年，這個(gè)問(wèn)題得到了回答。
當(dāng)“朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)”爆發(fā)時(shí)，原朝鮮軍隊(duì)幾乎占領(lǐng)了朝鮮的大部分地區(qū)，然后美國(guó)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的聯(lián)軍介入沖突。
聯(lián)軍贏得了一場(chǎng)又一場(chǎng)的戰(zhàn)斗，將北方軍隊(duì)打回去，一直打回去。這是一場(chǎng)接一場(chǎng)的勝利。美國(guó)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的軍隊(duì)把朝鮮軍隊(duì)打到了中國(guó)邊境。
當(dāng)由美國(guó)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的聯(lián)軍越過(guò)中國(guó)邊境，開始轟炸中國(guó)時(shí)... 中國(guó)介入了。
從中國(guó)介入的那一刻起，戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的天平發(fā)生了逆轉(zhuǎn)。在一場(chǎng)又一場(chǎng)的戰(zhàn)斗之后，中國(guó)取得了勝利。后來(lái)的情況清楚地顯示了這場(chǎng)對(duì)美國(guó)不斷取得的中國(guó)勝利的沖擊。
美國(guó)請(qǐng)求和平，并同意撤退。他們?cè)谝粓?chǎng)（經(jīng)典的）潰敗中離開。軍事設(shè)施被匆忙棄置，其軍火庫(kù)通過(guò)海軍炮擊遠(yuǎn)程轟炸來(lái)毀掉。
總的來(lái)說(shuō)，那個(gè)時(shí)候，美國(guó)處于權(quán)力和全球影響的巔峰，但卻輸給了中國(guó)。不僅是“輸”，而且是以最不體面的方式撤退。美國(guó)遭受了一場(chǎng)壯觀的失敗。
美國(guó)軍隊(duì)是否比解放軍更強(qiáng)大？
沒有人知道。
我們只能以歷史為指南。
通過(guò)這樣做，我們清楚地看到中國(guó)解放軍與美國(guó)作戰(zhàn)并取得了勝利。由讀者自行判斷，中國(guó)解放軍是否比1950年弱，以及美國(guó)軍隊(duì)是否比1950年更強(qiáng)大。
看看“朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)”是什么樣的？

Geoffrey Thorndyke
You do realise that there are about a dozen US States that are bigger than the United Kingdom? (it is actually one fortieth the area of the USA), and there are about 250 million more Americans than Britons?, and the US GDP is 10 times the size of the UK?
USA and China are the third and fourth largest Countries by area, the UK is the 78th !
I wonder if that could have anything to do with it ?.

你知道有大約十幾個(gè)美國(guó)州比英國(guó)大嗎？（實(shí)際上，英國(guó)的面積是美國(guó)的四十分之一），而且美國(guó)人口比英國(guó)多大約2.5億人？而且美國(guó)的GDP是英國(guó)的十倍？
美國(guó)和中國(guó)是面積第三和第四大的國(guó)家，而英國(guó)排名第78！
我想這可能與此有關(guān)吧？

Andy Durden
Related
Will China overtake the US militarily?
Not for a long long time.
In pretty much every single area of military development the US maintains large superiority.
Better navy, better army, better airforce.
What China will be able to do is to build strategic antishipping missile defences to created a denial zone a few thousands of Km from China mainland.
Chinese anti ship missiles
are designed to deter foreign navies from, not only reaching Chinese territorial waters but even other parts of the seas and oceans around China

相關(guān)討論
中國(guó)會(huì)在軍事上超過(guò)美國(guó)嗎？
很長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間內(nèi)都不會(huì)。
在幾乎每個(gè)軍事發(fā)展領(lǐng)域，美國(guó)都保持著巨大的優(yōu)勢(shì)。
更強(qiáng)大的海軍，更強(qiáng)大的陸軍，更強(qiáng)大的空軍。
中國(guó)將能夠建立戰(zhàn)略性的反艦導(dǎo)彈防御系統(tǒng)，形成一個(gè)距離中國(guó)大陸數(shù)千公里的防御區(qū)。
中國(guó)的反艦導(dǎo)彈
旨在威懾外國(guó)海軍，不僅阻止它們進(jìn)入中國(guó)領(lǐng)海，甚至是中國(guó)周圍的其他海域。

Ernest W. Adams
Related
Can China really take on the USA militarily?
That depends on what it's trying to do. China cannot fight and win a blue water sea war with the United States, at least with conventional weapons. Its navy is not strong enough. It can definitely defend mainland China against invasion, and the USA would never try it.
The real question at present is what the USA would do if China mounted an amphibious assault on Taiwan. If the US really commits to Taiwan's defense, the assault would fail—but is the US willing to do that?

相關(guān)討論
中國(guó)在軍事上真的能與美國(guó)匹敵嗎？
這取決于它試圖做什么。中國(guó)至少用傳統(tǒng)武器無(wú)法在海戰(zhàn)中與美國(guó)抗衡并取勝。它的海軍實(shí)力不夠強(qiáng)大。但它絕對(duì)可以防御中國(guó)大陸免受入侵，而美國(guó)也絕不會(huì)嘗試這樣做。
當(dāng)前真正的問(wèn)題是，如果中國(guó)對(duì)臺(tái)灣發(fā)動(dòng)兩棲進(jìn)攻，美國(guó)會(huì)采取什么行動(dòng)。如果美國(guó)真的致力于捍衛(wèi)臺(tái)灣，那么進(jìn)攻將會(huì)失敗，但美國(guó)是否愿意這樣做呢？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

Man With A Plan
Its due to the fallout from ww1 and ww2. Without the world wars of the 20th century the US could not have attained its peak power circa 1950's - 60's and it could not have maintained its empire throughout the cold war and into the modern era. Similarly China was weakened by events but also ultimately gained freedom from the influence of the old imperial powers including the UK. The UK didn't really gain anything from events, they only lost. All things being equal and overtime China will quite rightly usurp the US at the top. In time India will also do likewise. This is only natural in a free market system as these are the most populous nations.

這是由于一戰(zhàn)和二戰(zhàn)導(dǎo)致的后果。如果沒有20世紀(jì)的世界大戰(zhàn)，美國(guó)就無(wú)法在1950年代和60年代左右達(dá)到其巔峰實(shí)力，也無(wú)法在冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期一直保持其帝國(guó)地位，直至進(jìn)入現(xiàn)代社會(huì)。同樣，中國(guó)也因?yàn)槎?zhàn)事件而削弱，但最終擺脫了包括英國(guó)在內(nèi)的舊帝國(guó)勢(shì)力的影響，獲得了自由。英國(guó)在這些事件中實(shí)際上并沒有得到什么，他們只是失去了。一切平等，隨著時(shí)間的推移，中國(guó)將正當(dāng)?shù)厝〈绹?guó)的地位。印度最終也會(huì)做同樣的事情。在自由市場(chǎng)體系中，這只是最人口眾多的國(guó)家自然而然的發(fā)展。