中國的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策如何加速其綠色科技經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展
How China’s Industrial Policy Accelerated Its Green Tech Economy's Growth
譯文簡介
四川擁有最大的清潔能源產(chǎn)業(yè)集群--這是產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的結(jié)果。
當?shù)卣賳T精心挑選企業(yè)來補充產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈，形成了一條"流水線"，上游企業(yè)的產(chǎn)品將滿足鄰近城市下游企業(yè)的需求。
正文翻譯
四川擁有最大的清潔能源產(chǎn)業(yè)集群--這是產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的結(jié)果。
當?shù)卣賳T精心挑選企業(yè)來補充產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈，形成了一條"流水線"，上游企業(yè)的產(chǎn)品將滿足鄰近城市下游企業(yè)的需求。
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 13 )
收藏
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoRcP87Lu78
中國的產(chǎn)業(yè)政策如何加速其綠色科技經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展
Local government officials carefully sexts the companies to complement the industrial chain, creating an ‘a(chǎn)ssembly line’ where an upstream company’s products will feed into a downstream company’s needs in a neighbouring city.
四川擁有最大的清潔能源產(chǎn)業(yè)集群--這是產(chǎn)業(yè)政策的結(jié)果。
當?shù)卣賳T精心挑選企業(yè)來補充產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈，形成了一條"流水線"，上游企業(yè)的產(chǎn)品將滿足鄰近城市下游企業(yè)的需求。
China's GREEN energy production is 60% of US TOTAL energy production
中國的綠色能源的產(chǎn)量是美國總能源產(chǎn)量的60%。
The cost of photovoltaic power generation in China is lower than that of coal-fired power generation.
However, due to the instability of photoelectricity, a large number of pumped storage power stations are being built in China, which are used to convert the photoelectricity in the peak period into potential energy storage.
中國光伏發(fā)電的成本低于燃煤發(fā)電。
但由于光電的不穩(wěn)定性，我國正在建設大量抽水蓄能電站，用于將高峰期的光電轉(zhuǎn)化為電能儲存起來。
Do you really think the west cares about climate or other countries?
你真的認為西方關(guān)心氣候或其他國家嗎？
you know the answer
你知道答案。
well they cared about it when they saw it as a new growth driver for their own economy. Now they realize Chinese competition is too strong, they already dialing back their green policies. Mercedez Benz already cancelled their full electric by 2030 committment
當他們把中國視為本國經(jīng)濟新的增長動力時，他們就會關(guān)心這個問題。現(xiàn)在，他們意識到來自中國的競爭太激烈了，因此已經(jīng)開始縮減其綠色政策。梅塞德斯-奔馳公司已經(jīng)取消了到2030年實現(xiàn)全電動化的承諾。
They do, only when it aligns with their interests.
他們會的，只是在符合他們利益的時候。
If nobody cares
Somebody Will care
And Will be more embarrasing for the west
如果沒人在乎，
那么有人會在乎，
而且會讓西方更加難堪。
Cheap electricity is what we need.
我們需要廉價的電力。
which is the reason why, U$ led G7 will never allow it.
They need to create scarcity, to create dependencies, only in poverty can you control the population and work until they drop!
That is the reason why capitalism is the best system money can buy.
這就是為什么以美國為首的七國集團永遠不會允許（產(chǎn)業(yè)政策）的原因。
他們需要制造匱乏，制造依賴，只有在貧困中才能控制人口，工作到他們倒下為止！
這就是為什么資本主義是金錢所能買到的最好制度的原因。
1:57 CATL doesn't supply BYD, BYD uses its won battery and they are the number 2 biggest battery producer in the world just next to CATL.
1:57 寧德時代并不給比亞迪供貨，比亞迪用的是自己的電池，他們是僅次于寧德時代的世界第二大電池生產(chǎn)商。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Next it target by US gov. Call national security treat
這是美國政府的下一個目標，呼叫國家安全局。
China will just jointly develop with countries that are not NATO, not 5 eyes, not Aukus and not Quad.
中國只會和非北約、非五眼、非Aukus、非四國聯(lián)盟的國家聯(lián)合發(fā)展。
You can bet on that.
Alternatively like EU accuse China of state controlled / subsidies and impose tariffs to disadvantage Chinese products.
你可以打賭。
歐盟會指責中國的國家控制/補貼并征收關(guān)稅，使中國產(chǎn)品處于不利的地位。
culture different , create different behavior
U$A American football competition is to dominate/ 00ccupy.
China table tennis competition is to improve skill together.
文化不同會導致行為不同。
美國的美式足球比賽是為了稱霸/ 征服。
而中國的乒乓球比賽是為了共同提高技術(shù)。
This is the advantage of good central planning for base infrastructure geared for economic development. Compared to scattered n reactive approach of the US capitalist approach, this is way more efficient n effective. Good infrastructure eliminates most unnecessary roadblocks for entities to focus their efforts on innovation in their fields. US will find it hard to catch up
這就是中央規(guī)劃好的以經(jīng)濟發(fā)展為導向的基礎設施的優(yōu)勢。與美國資本主義的分散和被動方式相比，這種方式更有效率和效果。良好的基礎設施消除了大多數(shù)不必要的障礙，使各實體能夠?qū)Ｗ⒂诟髯灶I域的創(chuàng)新。美國將很難迎頭趕上。
Can be... but not always.hence maybe non causation...
Case:
French vs Britain road etc network development....
The French mostly was a hinder to industry since it was a political military decision that is top down despotic.
可以是......但并不總是......因此這可能不是因果關(guān)系。
案例：
法國與英國在道路等網(wǎng)絡方面的發(fā)展....
法國大體上是工業(yè)發(fā)展的阻礙，因為它依賴自上而下的專制的政治軍事決策。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
Prof Quay is spot on. Time to dump ego pride nationalism and flags. We face civilization threatening situations that requires diplomacy statesmanship negotiations pragmatism compromise.
Quay教授說得很對。是時候拋棄自我驕傲的民族主義和國旗了，我們面臨著威脅文明的局勢，我們需要外交、政治、談判、務實、妥協(xié)。
Good to know, but many western and Indian will not like any such development in China.
May be better not to disclose what China has. Too many bad actors full of jealousy.
很高興知道這一點，但許多西方人和印度人不會喜歡中國的任何此類發(fā)展。
最好還是不要透露中國的情況，因為有太多充滿嫉妒的壞人。
I think it’s a good thing that lots of countries won’t recognize the advancement of EV and green energy development in China. They’ll never catch up if they don’t even acknowledge the progress.
我覺得很多國家不承認中國電動汽車和綠色能源發(fā)展的進步是件好事。他們不承認進步，就永遠趕不上。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處
CATL doesn't supply BYD, BYD has its won battery. CATL supplies BMW, Mercedes-Benz Group, Hyundai, Honda, Li Auto, NIO, Groupe PSA/Stellantis, Tesla, Toyota, Volkswagen, Geely, Volvo Cars, XPeng, Lotus, VinFast, Ford
寧德時代不向比亞迪供貨，比亞迪有自己的電池。寧德時代的電池供應給寶馬、梅賽德斯-奔馳集團、現(xiàn)代、本田、理想、蔚來、標致雪鐵龍集團、特斯拉、豐田、大眾、吉利、沃爾沃汽車、新鵬、蓮花、VinFast、福特。
Renewable Energy Integration with the Main Grid drives the Green Economy and decarbonization of the Economy.
可再生能源將與主電網(wǎng)一體化推動綠色經(jīng)濟和經(jīng)濟去碳化。
We, (every country) should always seek to be friendly with each other. That said. There should also be equality in the manufacturing of all consumable products and services. This would even out the needs of each countries citizesns to work and earn a sustainable income.
我們（每一個國家）都應該尋求相互友好。話雖如此，所有消費品和服務的生產(chǎn)也應平等，這將平衡各國公民的工作和可持續(xù)收入需求。
It's not just environment but also beneficial to CHINA where power demand keeps growing and domestic production of fossil fuels such as oil and gas can't keep up and rely more on imports which is very dangerous and vulnerable as country seeks for energy security and independence. It will also drive down the cost as industrial supply chain is domesticated and can be source out from inside the country rather than relying on imports. It will create more jobs as well.
這不僅對環(huán)境有益，而且對中國也有好處，因為中國的電力需求不斷增長，而國內(nèi)石油和天然氣等化石燃料的生產(chǎn)跟不上，只能更多地依賴進口，這在中國尋求能源安全和獨立的過程中是非常危險和脆弱的。這也將降低成本，因為工業(yè)供應鏈已實現(xiàn)國產(chǎn)化，可以從國內(nèi)采購，而不是依賴進口。它還將創(chuàng)造更多的就業(yè)機會。
So chinas economy is not dying
所以，中國經(jīng)濟不會消亡。
Transformation disruptions in progress. Some parts of the economy are dying or moving overseas ...
中國經(jīng)濟正處于轉(zhuǎn)型中斷中，其部分經(jīng)濟領域正在消亡或向海外轉(zhuǎn)移......
The country which is going to Hi-tech and more Hi-tech development, will never die. In future it will again pickup and lead the world in terms of development.
走向高科技和更多高科技發(fā)展的國家永遠不會消亡。未來，它將再次崛起并引領世界的發(fā)展。
China filed nearly half (46.8% to be exact) of the world's patents in 2022, according to the latest official report from WIPO in November, 2023.
根據(jù)世界知識產(chǎn)權(quán)組織（WIPO）2023年11月的最新官方報告，2022年中國的專利申請量占全球?qū)＠暾埩康慕话耄ù_切地說是46.8%）。
China has been collapsing for 50 years don’t you know ???
中國已經(jīng)BK50年了，你不知道嗎？
japan,korea, united states all experienced economic collapse sometime in the past, they are just fine now.
日本、韓國、美國都曾經(jīng)歷過經(jīng)濟崩潰，他們現(xiàn)在都很好。
HMM, your report is basically saying their governance system is better?!
嗯，你的報告基本上是在說他們的治理體系更好？
Here in USA, we don’t want the government to pick winners and losers. Government is very inefficient.
在美國，我們不希望政府挑選贏家和輸家。我們的政府的效率很低。
Then the Department of Defense and the Pentagon should be auctioned off to the highest CORPORATE bidder.
那么國防部和五角大樓應該拍賣給出價最高的公司。
As of 2022, China ?????? was by far the world's largest coal consumer with 55% of energy use, an increase of 2% of the total energy from the year before.
So China is accelerating the use of coal despite it having signed the Paris agreement.
截至2022年，中國是迄今為止世界上最大的煤炭消費國，占其能源使用量的55%，比前一年增加了2%。
因此，盡管中國已經(jīng)簽署了巴黎協(xié)定，但仍在加速使用煤炭。
Hello indian bot???
Countries that lead the world in 44 critical technology* sectors:
1. China = 37
2. USA = 7
3. UK = 0
4. Germany = 0
5. Japan = 0
*In fields like defence, space, robotics, energy, the environment, biotechnology, artificial intelligence (AI), advanced materials and key quantum technology areas
Source: Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI)
**India leads the world in the field of cow husbandry, which is neither a technology nor critical
你好，印度機器人。
在44個關(guān)鍵技術(shù)*領域處于世界領先地位的國家：
1. 中國 = 37
2. 美國 = 7
3. 英國 = 0
4. 德國 = 0
5. 日本 = 0
* 涉及國防、太空、機器人、能源、環(huán)境、生物技術(shù)、人工智能（AI）、先進材料和關(guān)鍵量子技術(shù)領域。
資料來源：澳大利亞戰(zhàn)略政策研究所 (ASPI)
**印度在奶牛飼養(yǎng)領域領先世界，但這既不是技術(shù)，也不是關(guān)鍵技術(shù)。
China is world’s manufacturing hub, of course it will have largest carbon footprint to support the World’s needs, you have to calculate China’s carbon footprint against the world’s population basically anyone who buys China-made goods. China’s policies to go green are aggressive and are put in place with clear roadmap of transitioning into more green energy and net 0 carbon foot print not in distant future…You must be blind to not see the progress…the current coal is to support this transition, but already expect to peak earlier than expected- as early as 2025. China’s green energy growth is largest in world covering all types- wind, solar, nuclear, hydro, etc. and you miss the fact that coal as % of total energy generation in China has gone from ~78% early 2000 to only 55%, especially considering the tremendous growth in the recent two decades.
中國是世界制造業(yè)中心，當然會有最大的碳足跡來支持世界的需求，你必須計算中國的碳足跡與世界人口的比例，基本上所有人都會購買中國制造的商品。中國的綠色環(huán)保政策非常積極并制定了清晰的路線圖，即在不遠的將來向更多的綠色能源和零碳足跡過渡......你一定是個瞎子，看不到這些進展......目前的煤炭是為了支持這一過渡，但已經(jīng)預計將比預期提前達到峰值--早在2025年。中國的綠色能源增長是世界上最大的，涵蓋了風能、太陽能、核能、水能等所有類型，而你忽略了一個事實，即煤炭在中國總發(fā)電量中所占的比例已從2000年初的約78%降至僅55%，尤其是在考慮到最近二十年中國經(jīng)濟的巨大增長下。
Chinese average ai Q is 105 and Indian average ai Q is 76. Why does India still love humiliating itself by comparing itself with China?
中國的平均IQ值是105，印度的平均IQ值是76。為什么印度還喜歡自取其辱地與中國比較？
YOU forgot the part where China's hydropower and solar and wind power generation is the largest in the world by magnitudes.
AND THOSE "green energy" total production in China is greater than all of the total electric power production in all of "india".
你忘了中國的水電、太陽能和風能的發(fā)電量是世界上最大的。
這些"綠色能源"在中國的總產(chǎn)量超過了"印度"全國的總發(fā)電量。