世界上首次，丹麥對(duì)產(chǎn)生氣體的農(nóng)場(chǎng)動(dòng)物征收碳稅

Denmark imposes world's first carbon tax on flatulent farm animals

2024-08-16 imlrz 4518 20 3 收藏糾錯(cuò)&舉報(bào)

譯文簡(jiǎn)介

從 2030 年開(kāi)始，丹麥將對(duì)牛、羊和豬排放的溫室氣體向畜牧業(yè)者征稅，成為第一個(gè)針對(duì)這一主要甲烷排放源的國(guó)家。

正文翻譯

Denmark imposes world's first carbon tax on flatulent farm animals

世界上首次，丹麥對(duì)產(chǎn)生氣體的農(nóng)場(chǎng)動(dòng)物征收碳稅

The European country's goal is to reduce Danish greenhouse gas emissions by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030

這個(gè)歐洲國(guó)家的目標(biāo)是到 2030 年，將丹麥的溫室氣體排放量從 1990 年的水平減少 70%

Associated Press
Published June 26, 2024 9:43am EDT
·Denmark will tax livestock farmers for greenhouse gases emitted by cows, sheep, and pigs starting in 2030, becoming the first country to target this major source of methane emissions.

·從 2030 年開(kāi)始，丹麥將對(duì)牛、羊和豬排放的溫室氣體向畜牧業(yè)者征稅，成為第一個(gè)針對(duì)這一主要甲烷排放源的國(guó)家。

·The European country's goal is to reduce Danish greenhouse gas emissions by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030.

·這個(gè)歐洲國(guó)家的目標(biāo)是到 2030 年，將丹麥的溫室氣體排放量從 1990 年的水平減少 70%。

·From 2030, livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent, increasing to $108 by 2035.

·從 2030 年起，畜牧業(yè)者每噸二氧化碳當(dāng)量的稅額為 43 美元，到 2035 年將增加到 108 美元。

Denmark will tax livestock farmers for the greenhouse gases emitted by their cows, sheep and pigs from 2030, the first country in the world to do so as it targets a major source of methane emissions, one of the most potent gases contributing to global warming.

從2030年起，丹麥將對(duì)畜牧業(yè)者牛、羊和豬排放的溫室氣體征稅，這是世界上第一個(gè)這樣做的國(guó)家，因?yàn)樗哪繕?biāo)是甲烷排放的主要來(lái)源，甲烷是導(dǎo)致全球變暖的最有效氣體之一。

The aim is to reduce Danish greenhouse gas emissions by 70% from 1990 levels by 2030, said Taxation Minister Jeppe Bruus.

目標(biāo)是到2030年將丹麥的溫室氣體排放量從1990年的水平減少70%，稅務(wù)部長(zhǎng)Jeppe Bruus說(shuō)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

As of 2030, Danish livestock farmers will be taxed $43 per ton of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2030. The tax will increase to $108 by 2035. However, because of an income tax deduction of 60%, the actual cost per ton will start at $17.3 and increase to $28 by 2035.

到 2030 年，丹麥畜牧業(yè)者將被征稅每噸二氧化碳當(dāng)量 43 美元。到 2035 年，稅收將增加到 108 美元。然而，由于所得稅減免了60%，每噸的實(shí)際成本將會(huì)從17.3美元開(kāi)始，到2035年將增加到28美元。

Although carbon dioxide typically gets more attention for its role in climate change, methane traps about 87 times more heat on a 20-year timescale, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

根據(jù)美國(guó)國(guó)家海洋和大氣管理局（U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration）的數(shù)據(jù)，盡管二氧化碳通常因其在氣候變化中的作用而受到更多關(guān)注，但在20年的時(shí)間尺度上，甲烷捕捉的熱量大約是二氧化碳的87倍。

Cows graze in a field in Luncavita, Romania, on May 21, 2019. Denmark will impose cattle farmers with a tax on livestock carbon dioxide emissions from 2030, claiming it will be the first country to do so, in a move to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from each of their cows. (AP Photo/Vadim Ghirda, File)

2019年5月21日，奶牛在羅馬尼亞倫卡維塔的田野里吃草。丹麥將從 2030 年開(kāi)始對(duì)養(yǎng)牛戶征收牲畜二氧化碳排放稅，聲稱將是第一個(gè)這樣做的國(guó)家，以減少每頭奶牛的溫室氣體排放。

Levels of methane, which is emitted from sources including landfills, oil and natural gas systems and livestock, have increased particularly quickly since 2020. Livestock accounts for about 32% of human-caused methane emissions, says the U.N. Environment Program.

自 2020 年以來(lái)，垃圾填埋場(chǎng)、石油和天然氣系統(tǒng)以及牲畜等來(lái)源排放的甲烷水平增長(zhǎng)尤為迅速。聯(lián)合國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)劃署表示，牲畜約占人為甲烷排放量的32%。

"We will take a big step closer in becoming climate neutral in 2045," Bruus said, adding Denmark "will be the first country in the world to introduce a real CO2 tax on agriculture" and hoped other countries would follow suit.

“我們將在 2045 年實(shí)現(xiàn)氣候中和方面邁出一大步，”布魯斯（Bruus）說(shuō)，并補(bǔ)充說(shuō)丹麥“將成為世界上第一個(gè)對(duì)農(nóng)業(yè)征收實(shí)際二氧化碳稅的國(guó)家”，并希望其他國(guó)家效仿。
【這里的布魯斯（Bruus）是丹麥的稅務(wù)部長(zhǎng)】

New Zealand had passed a similar law due to take effect in 2025. However, the legislation was removed from the statute book on Wednesday after hefty criticism from farmers and a change of government at the 2023 election from a center-left ruling bloc to a center-right one. New Zealand said it would exclude agriculture from its emissions trading scheme in favor of exploring other ways to reduce methane.

新西蘭也通過(guò)了一項(xiàng)類(lèi)似的法律，將于2025年生效。然而，在受到農(nóng)民的嚴(yán)厲批評(píng)以及 2023 年大選中，政府從中左翼統(tǒng)治集團(tuán)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橹杏乙斫y(tǒng)治集團(tuán)之后，該立法于周三從法規(guī)中刪除。新西蘭表示，將把農(nóng)業(yè)排除在其排放交易計(jì)劃之外，轉(zhuǎn)而探索其他減少甲烷的方法。

In Denmark, the deal was reached late Monday between the center-right government and representatives of farmers, the industry, unxs, among others, and presented Tuesday.

在丹麥，該協(xié)議于周一晚些時(shí)候由中右翼政府與農(nóng)民、行業(yè)、工會(huì)等代表達(dá)成，并于周二提交。

Denmark's move comes after months of protests by farmers across Europe against climate change mitigation measures and regulations that they say are driving them to bankruptcy.

丹麥的舉動(dòng)是在歐洲各地農(nóng)民抗議氣候變化緩解措施和法規(guī)的數(shù)月之后采取的，農(nóng)民說(shuō)這些措施和法規(guī)正在迫使他們破產(chǎn)。

The Danish Society for Nature Conservation, the largest nature conservation and environmental organization in Denmark, described the tax agreement as "a historic compromise."

丹麥最大的自然保護(hù)和環(huán)境組織丹麥自然保護(hù)協(xié)會(huì)（Danish Society for Nature Conservation）將該稅收協(xié)議描述為“歷史性的妥協(xié)方案”。

"We have succeeded in landing a compromise on a CO2 tax, which lays the groundwork for a restructured food industry -– also on the other side of 2030," its head Maria Reumert Gjerding said after the talks in which they took part.

“我們已經(jīng)成功地在二氧化碳稅方面達(dá)成了妥協(xié)，這為重組食品行業(yè)奠定了基礎(chǔ) - 也包括2030年之后，”其負(fù)責(zé)人瑪麗亞·雷烏默特·耶爾?。∕aria Reumert Gjerding）在參加會(huì)談后表示。

A typical Danish cow produces 6.6 tons of CO2 equivalent per year. Denmark, which is a large dairy and pork exporter, will also tax pigs, although cows produce far higher emissions than pigs.

一頭標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的丹麥奶牛每年產(chǎn)生 6.6 噸二氧化碳當(dāng)量。丹麥(一個(gè)大型乳制品和豬肉出口國(guó))也將對(duì)豬征稅，盡管奶牛的排放量遠(yuǎn)高于豬。

The tax is to be approved in the 179-seat Folketing, or parliament, but the bill is expected to pass after the broad-based consensus.

該稅在擁有179個(gè)席位的丹麥國(guó)會(huì)（Folketing），又叫議會(huì)（parliament），中獲得批準(zhǔn)，該法案預(yù)計(jì)將在得到廣泛共識(shí)后通過(guò)。

According to Statistic Denmark, there were as of June 30, 2022, 1,484,377 cows in the Scandinavian country, a slight drop compared to the previous year.

根據(jù)丹麥統(tǒng)計(jì)局的數(shù)據(jù)，截至 2022 年 6 月 30 日，斯堪的納維亞國(guó)家有 1,484,377 頭奶牛，與上一年相比略有下降。
【Scandinavian country：斯堪的納維亞國(guó)家：指位于北歐半島上的丹麥、挪威和瑞典三個(gè)國(guó)家?！?br />

評(píng)論翻譯

Conversation
Dataman302
Here’s the real science behind this. It’s not the cow that produces the methane it’s the bacteria inside the cows gut that produces the methane as a byproduct of digestion which the cow then lives off the bacteria and the other products of that bacterial growth. Interestingly enough it’s the same bacterial families that would have “decomposed “ the grass &/or feed had the farmer left it in the field.

這里是這背后的真正科學(xué)。產(chǎn)生甲烷的不是奶牛，而是奶牛腸道內(nèi)的細(xì)菌產(chǎn)生甲烷，甲烷是消化的副產(chǎn)品，然后奶牛以細(xì)菌和細(xì)菌產(chǎn)生的其他產(chǎn)物為生。有趣的是，如果農(nóng)民將草&/或飼料留在田間，它們會(huì)“分解”草&/或飼料。

In fact since in most developed countries the manure which hasn’t fully been decomposed is sold as fertilizer decreasing the need for petroleum derived fertilizers the total methane produced via cattle is less than that which would have been produced by leaving the grass in the ground and natural decomposition occurring.

事實(shí)上，由于在大多數(shù)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家，將尚未完全分解的糞便作為肥料出售，從而減少了對(duì)石油衍生肥料的需求，因此通過(guò)牛產(chǎn)生的甲烷總量，低于將草留在地下并發(fā)生自然分解所產(chǎn)生的甲烷。

TLR314159
Now, now, the left doesn't like pesky facts! ;)

現(xiàn)在，現(xiàn)在，左派不喜歡麻煩的事實(shí)！ ;)

nottarealname
Yes but one glaring issue: how many cows.

是的，但有一個(gè)明顯的問(wèn)題：有多少頭奶牛。

The industry of farming is the incentive of actively breeding cows more than would exist without that domestic animal husbandry control.

如果沒(méi)有國(guó)家的畜牧業(yè)控制，農(nóng)業(yè)這個(gè)行業(yè)的動(dòng)機(jī)是積極繁殖更多奶牛。

The law is in a roundabout way literally trying to reduce the number of cows, to say the industry has to actually shrink.

該法律實(shí)際上是以一種迂回的方式試圖減少奶牛的數(shù)量，也就是說(shuō)該行業(yè)實(shí)際上必須縮小。

There are certain dietary regulations that might have a per-cow benefit on percentile margins.

有一些針對(duì)牛的飲食規(guī)定可能會(huì)提高每頭牛的利潤(rùn)率。

The real leap is number of cows.

但真正的提高是奶牛的數(shù)量。

But its easier to pass laws that have taxes that force a defacto shrink than to outright say "decimate your cattle inventory, right now, here is your cow limit"

但比起直接說(shuō)“立刻削減你的奶牛庫(kù)存，這是你的牛數(shù)的上限”，通過(guò)稅收的法律來(lái)強(qiáng)制的達(dá)到實(shí)際上的縮減要容易得多

Don'tBeGullible
NATURE IS FINE, JUST LEAVE IT ALONE!!!

大自然很好，別管它了!!

scubadeb
This is why the EU is getting conservative because these liberals need to go.

這就是為什么歐盟越來(lái)越保守，因?yàn)檫@些自由主義者需要被趕走。

ironmuncher
It isn't about the climate scam, it's about raising taxes for the new jets to visit Davos

這并不是關(guān)于氣候騙局的，而是為了增加稅收以購(gòu)買(mǎi)新飛機(jī)去達(dá)沃斯的。
【Davos：通常指的是世界經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇年會(huì)，許多全球領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人和富商都會(huì)乘坐私人飛機(jī)前往參加?！?/b>

starstreams
There isn't any climate crisis. Carbon, including methane is not pollution. There isn't any substitute for petrol energy, including coal. But dream on.

這里沒(méi)有任何的氣候危機(jī)。碳，包括甲烷，都不是污染。汽油能源沒(méi)有任何替代品，包括煤炭。繼續(xù)做夢(mèng)吧。

Methane is the primary gas in the circle of life on Earth. Our breeding animals isn't increasing the numbers of these animals. Just a few hundred years ago, the wild bison, buffalo and cows, yes cows bred and roamed wild in far greater numbers. These animals haven't increased any methane levels at all. And if they did, it wouldn't matter. The methane has zero effects.

甲烷是地球上生命循環(huán)中的主要?dú)怏w。我們繁殖的動(dòng)物并沒(méi)有增加這類(lèi)動(dòng)物的數(shù)量。就在幾百年前，野生的野牛、水牛和奶牛，是的，奶牛在野外繁殖和流浪的數(shù)量要多得多。這些動(dòng)物根本沒(méi)有增加任何甲烷水平。如果他們真的這樣做了，那也沒(méi)關(guān)系。甲烷的影響為零。

imsmarterthanyou873
We do have a success crisis for governments. Success of the individual means freedom from government. Socialist/com...sts cannot tolerate this.

對(duì)政府來(lái)說(shuō)，我們確實(shí)面臨成功危機(jī)。個(gè)體的成功意味著擺脫政府的控制。社會(huì)主義者/共產(chǎn)主義者無(wú)法容忍這一點(diǎn)。

Don'tBeGullible
Genius comments!!!

天才評(píng)論!!

nottarealname
"Our breeding animals isn't increasing the numbers of these animals"

“我們繁殖的動(dòng)物并沒(méi)有增加這類(lèi)動(dòng)物的數(shù)量?！?/b>

This is the dumbest thing you could have said even if you included flat earthism in your denial of man-influenced climate change.

這是你說(shuō)過(guò)的最愚蠢的話，即你在否認(rèn)人為影響著氣候變化的時(shí)候還加入了地平說(shuō)。

The industry of breeding animals, and thus actually maintaining and increasing a supply of animals than what would otherwise exist from just hunting/trapping in the wild, increases the number that would exist otherwise.

飼養(yǎng)動(dòng)物的行業(yè)，因此是實(shí)際上維持和增加了動(dòng)物的供應(yīng)，而不是僅僅從野外狩獵/誘捕，這增加了本來(lái)就存在的數(shù)量。

To deny this is to deny the most basic concept of cause and effect and the sequential nature that bigger numbers are in fact bigger numbers.

否定這一點(diǎn)，就是在否定最基本的因果關(guān)系概念，以及否定數(shù)列的本質(zhì)是，更大的數(shù)就是更大的數(shù)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

There are obxtively more bovines in the form of cattle in the United States today, than there were ever in wild bovines in the ancient pre-1800s Americas even by the most liberal estimates.

客觀上，今天在美國(guó)以家牛形式出現(xiàn)的牛比 1800 年代之前的古代美洲的野牛還要多，即使按照最自由派/大數(shù)量的估計(jì)也是如此。
【liberal：本身意思有：a.自由的；大量的?！?/b>

starstreams
“There are obxtively more bovines in the form of cattle in the United States today, than there were ever in wild bovines in the ancient pre-1800s Americas even by the most liberal estimates.”

“客觀上，今天在美國(guó)以家牛形式出現(xiàn)的牛比 1800 年代之前的古代美洲的野牛還要多，即使按照最自由派/大數(shù)量的估計(jì)也是如此?！?/b>

The number of beef cattle, including dairy fluctuate in the USA from 60 to 100 million head. Through the 19th century, just buffalo totaled over 300 million head, wild. Today breeding and other related agriculture activity doesn't even rival these numbers. And I haven't included bison, deer, elk, moose, and other large animals introduced into the US lands by occasional escapes by animals that are now breeding wild again. Swine is another one, more wild swine roam the plains that agriculture produces.

美國(guó)的肉牛數(shù)量（包括奶牛）從6000萬(wàn)頭到1億頭不等。整個(gè) 19 世紀(jì)，僅水牛就有超過(guò) 3 億頭，野生的。今天，人工繁殖和其他相關(guān)的農(nóng)業(yè)活動(dòng)甚至無(wú)法與這些數(shù)字相媲美。我還沒(méi)有包括野牛、鹿、麋鹿、駝鹿和其他大型動(dòng)物，而其它引進(jìn)美國(guó)的大型動(dòng)物偶爾會(huì)逃脫，這類(lèi)動(dòng)物現(xiàn)在又在野外繁殖。豬是其中一種，更多的野生豬在進(jìn)行農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)的平原上流浪。

nottarealname
Replying to starstreams

回復(fù) starstreams

Larger estimates of bison in the Americas overall Pre-19th were 60,000,000

19世紀(jì)之前美洲野牛的估計(jì)數(shù)為60,000,000

At any given time in the 21st cattle alone is 90,000,000 in the US, that's before factoring nutritional habits and volume, before factoring rotations of shorter life spans and expounded birth rates only quelled by a rotation of slaughter, rather than any stability of them living to the expected age in the "wild".

在21世紀(jì)的任何一個(gè)時(shí)候，僅在美國(guó)就有90,000,000頭牛，這還沒(méi)有考慮營(yíng)養(yǎng)習(xí)慣和產(chǎn)量的影響，也沒(méi)有考慮到輪班屠宰所壓抑的壽命和出生率，不會(huì)像讓它們?cè)凇耙吧杯h(huán)境中那樣存活到預(yù)期壽命。

I can concede the bulk of instrumentalist policies are flawed or counter productive. That's no reason to resort to denial that thinking the most basic cause and effect and that actions might in fact have consequences to the point we need to re-write history, chemistry, and dismiss the near entire scientific field as some sort of conspiracy theory to dupe us.

我可以承認(rèn)，大部分工具主義政策是有缺陷的或適得其反的。但沒(méi)有理由否認(rèn)思考最基本的因果關(guān)系，以及行動(dòng)實(shí)際上可能會(huì)產(chǎn)生的后果，以至于我們需要重寫(xiě)我們的歷史、化學(xué)，并將幾乎整個(gè)科學(xué)領(lǐng)域視為某種陰謀論來(lái)欺騙我們。

starstreams
“The industry of breeding animals, and thus actually maintaining and increasing a supply of animals than what would otherwise exist from just hunting/trapping in the wild, increases the number that would exist otherwise.”

“飼養(yǎng)動(dòng)物的行業(yè)，因此是實(shí)際上維持和增加了動(dòng)物的供應(yīng)，而不是僅僅從野外狩獵/誘捕，這增加了本來(lái)就存在的數(shù)量?！?/b>

Your post is totally false. Industrial breeding is NOT increasing the number of these animals that live their natural lives in specific inhabitants. You can verify this in any elementary level reference books.

你的帖子是完全錯(cuò)誤的。工業(yè)化飼養(yǎng)并沒(méi)有增加這些動(dòng)物的數(shù)量，這些動(dòng)物在特定棲息地中過(guò)著自然生活。您可以在任何的小學(xué)參考書(shū)中驗(yàn)證這一點(diǎn)。

steelydave108
America's progressives will be attempting this in the U.S. If we (Republicans & conservatives) don't stand in their way, get ready for $25.00/.lb for 75/25 ground beef. The 93/7 I buy will be astronomical.

美國(guó)的進(jìn)步人士將在美國(guó)嘗試這樣做。如果我們（共和黨人和保守派）不阻止他們，請(qǐng)準(zhǔn)備好以 25.00 美元/.磅的價(jià)格購(gòu)買(mǎi) 75/25 碎牛肉吧。我買(mǎi)的 93/7 牛肉價(jià)格將是天文數(shù)字。

bigfish12
If Biden wins the next Presidential election it will be implemented before his second term ends. He won't be President when his second term ends, but the same talking head will do exactly what Biden has been doing. It doesn't matter WHO wins the Presidency if it's a Liberal. That President has virtually no power or decision-making authority. This country is being from the dark.

如果拜登贏得下一屆總統(tǒng)選舉，他會(huì)在第二個(gè)任期結(jié)束之前實(shí)施這些政策。當(dāng)他的第二個(gè)任期結(jié)束時(shí)，他將不再是總統(tǒng)，但（下一屆）同樣位置的講話人將會(huì)繼續(xù)執(zhí)行拜登在做的事情。只要是自由黨人，誰(shuí)贏得總統(tǒng)選舉并不重要?？偨y(tǒng)實(shí)際上沒(méi)有權(quán)力或決策權(quán)。這個(gè)國(guó)家正處于黑暗之中。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

Don'tBeGullible
Biden win ='s TOTAL DESTRUCTION!!!! of.... everything

拜登獲勝=的徹底毀滅!!!包括….萬(wàn)物

o57
Its already that much or very close to it for a decent steak at the market,

市場(chǎng)上一塊像樣的牛排的價(jià)格已經(jīng)差不多了，

steelydave108
In the Carolinas, I paid $18.00 for two pounds of 93/7 ground beef the other day. Where do you buy steaks?

前幾天在卡羅來(lái)納，我花了18美元買(mǎi)了兩磅93/7碎牛肉。你在哪里買(mǎi)牛排?

Scieng2
And this does absolutely nothing for climate. The natural decay of the vegetation the cows eat will generate the same carbon whether the cows eat it or not.

這對(duì)氣候絕對(duì)沒(méi)有任何作用。無(wú)論奶牛是吃還是不吃，植被的自然腐爛和被奶牛吃下都會(huì)產(chǎn)生相同的碳。

This is just the anti science climate religion demonstrating its contempt for science.

這只是反科學(xué)氣候宗教的示威，表明其對(duì)科學(xué)的蔑視。

Want to understand the major impact on climate, look at what the earth’s magnetic fields do to impede the sun’s energy from warming the atmosphere.

想要了解對(duì)氣候的主要影響，先看看地球的磁場(chǎng)是如何阻止太陽(yáng)的能量使大氣變暖的。

Chris21
WE human produce as much if not more Methane than any of cows or steers o the face of earth right now, and it all stinks, been that way since our existence, it's not going to move the needle one bit.

我們?nèi)祟?lèi)產(chǎn)生的甲烷與現(xiàn)在地球上任何的一頭牛或馬一樣多，甚至更多，而且都很臭，這自從我們存在以來(lái)一直如此，它不會(huì)把（末日時(shí)鐘的）指針移動(dòng)一下的。

Also, I wonder how there going to measure which cow or steer producing to much methane, stick a probe up the backside!

另外，我想知道如何測(cè)量哪頭?；蚰念^牛會(huì)產(chǎn)生大量的甲烷，在背部插一個(gè)探頭嗎！

Chris21
So does cutting done trees!

砍伐后的樹(shù)木也是如此的！

QuiltyDiva
Ridiculous. Food prices will rise to the point where people are starving. Maybe that is the overall plan. If everyone cannot afford to buy food, people will die of malnutrition. Less people will help reduce greenhouse gases as well.

荒謬。食品的價(jià)格將上漲到讓人們挨餓的地步。也許這就是一切的計(jì)劃。如果每個(gè)人都買(mǎi)不起食物，人們就會(huì)死于營(yíng)養(yǎng)不良。更少的人也有助于減少溫室氣體。

Don'tBeGullible
You got it..!!

你抓住了重點(diǎn)..！！

Democrat plan for America and the rest of the world.

這是民主黨對(duì)美國(guó)和世界的其他地區(qū)的計(jì)劃。

They have NO idea what reducing greenhouse gases means... neither do I

他們不知道減少溫室氣體意味著什么......我也不知道

Don'tBeGullible
I thought green house gases were good..

我以為溫室氣體很好。

schofie256
Who wins in this One World Order other than the rich? Will they be the only ones still allowed to eat a steak dinner come 2040?

在這個(gè)“世界一個(gè)秩序”中，除了富人之外，還有誰(shuí)會(huì)贏？到 2040 年，他們會(huì)成為唯一被允許吃牛排晚餐的人嗎？

steelydave108
Yes, but we won't know about it because they'll hide it.

是的，但我們不會(huì)知道的，因?yàn)樗麄儠?huì)隱藏起來(lái)。

SagaciousFox
Since all ruminant animals produce methane, wouldn't it be best if we start this war on animal methane by destroying the giant herds of ungulates that roam in the wild in Africa? These millions of beasts do not supply much needed protein and dairy products for the world's food supply, but simply walk around and have their pictures taken. Elephants, hippos, giraffes, rhinos, wildebeest, and the like must produce huge quantities of that devil gas CH4.

既然所有的反芻動(dòng)物都會(huì)產(chǎn)生甲烷，那么如果我們通過(guò)摧毀在非洲野外漫游的巨型有蹄類(lèi)動(dòng)物群來(lái)開(kāi)啟這場(chǎng)對(duì)動(dòng)物甲烷的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，那不是最好的嗎？這些數(shù)以百萬(wàn)計(jì)的野獸并沒(méi)有為世界的食物供應(yīng)提供急需的蛋白質(zhì)和乳制品，而只是四處走動(dòng)并被拍照。大象、河馬、長(zhǎng)頸鹿、犀牛、牛羚等必定會(huì)產(chǎn)生大量的魔鬼氣體CH4。

jimdandy68
The big heater in the sky is freaking out and trying to cook the planet like it has thousands of times before and they think cow farts is making this happen. Every other creature on the planet is coping just fine like they have thousands of times before, but people can't somehow. Money grab aimed at gullible people. Going after a major source of protein makes as much sense as trying to make gasoline out corn which is a MAJOR food source. This line of thinking has never and will never change the trajectory of something we have no control over.

天空中的大型加熱器很激動(dòng)，試圖像以前的數(shù)千次一樣烹飪地球，而他們認(rèn)為是牛放屁造成的。這個(gè)星球上的其他生物都像以前發(fā)生過(guò)的成千上萬(wàn)次一樣應(yīng)對(duì)得很好，但人們卻不能以某種方式來(lái)應(yīng)對(duì)。金錢(qián)騙子的目標(biāo)正是容易上當(dāng)受騙的人。尋找一種主要的蛋白質(zhì)來(lái)源就像試圖從玉米中提煉汽油一樣有意義，玉米是一種主要的食物來(lái)源。這種想法從來(lái)沒(méi)有，也永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)改變我們所無(wú)法控制的事情的軌跡。

conservativevoter224
And they will use these tax dollars to do exactly what?

他們會(huì)用這些稅款來(lái)做什么？

Don'tBeGullible
To enjoy their steak dinners while they spend your money to convince you not to eat beef.

享受他們的牛排晚餐，同時(shí)他們花錢(qián)說(shuō)服你不要吃牛肉。

Grizbr784
To create more ways to tax you.

創(chuàng)造更多征稅方式想你征稅。

Lindytindy782
Bureaucrats living large.

官僚們過(guò)上奢華的生活。

Don'tBeGullible
ALWAYS...!!!

一直是…！??！

jolantru343
Make Biden's right cheek bigger....

讓拜登的右臉頰變的更大......

punisher2strike
So, the livestock carbon dioxide tax will make animals fart less?

那么，牲畜的二氧化碳稅會(huì)讓動(dòng)物少放屁嗎？

o57
Will make shoppers trying to find affordable meat products in the markets to feed their families move to another country .

將讓試圖在市場(chǎng)上找到負(fù)擔(dān)得起的肉類(lèi)產(chǎn)品來(lái)養(yǎng)家糊口的購(gòu)物者搬到另一個(gè)國(guó)家。

seademhawks
All of Europe are socialists. No different than Russia, but Ukraine went full com...st. When we created NATO and the UN we were protecting democracy and freedom. That is already gone. At this point, who cares about Europe? They are a cancer that spread socialism/Com...ism to the rest of the world.

整個(gè)歐洲都是社會(huì)主義者。與俄羅斯沒(méi)有什么不同，但烏克蘭完全變成了共產(chǎn)主義。當(dāng)我們創(chuàng)建北約和聯(lián)合國(guó)時(shí)，我們是在保護(hù)民主和自由。那個(gè)已經(jīng)不復(fù)存在了。在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上，誰(shuí)在乎歐洲？它們是將社會(huì)主義/共產(chǎn)主義傳播到世界其他地區(qū)的毒瘤/癌細(xì)胞。

As someone who deployed to Afghanistan I can assure you Europeans are only good for drinking. They are slothful and lazy. What happens in Europe with their wide-open borders, high taxation, socialism, climate change policies, soft-on-crime, DEI, and other things eventually gets adopted by our democrats. It is all designed to destroy nations and bring about one-world Com...ism. They'll get it because nobody is fighting for freedom.

作為一個(gè)被部署到阿富汗的人，我可以向你們保證，歐洲人只適合喝酒。他們遲鈍而懶惰。歐洲所發(fā)生的開(kāi)放邊界、高稅收、社會(huì)主義、氣候變化政策、對(duì)犯罪的寬容、DEI 和其他事情最終都會(huì)被我們的民主人士所采用。這一切都是為了摧毀國(guó)家，好實(shí)現(xiàn)”一個(gè)世界”的共產(chǎn)主義。他們會(huì)到達(dá)這個(gè)目標(biāo)的，因?yàn)闆](méi)有人為自由而戰(zhàn)。

fordguy830
They are social democrats and our democrats want to be just like them. Free everything through higher taxes. WE pay 12 to 20% for social security and Medicare out of our salaries in Europe it's 40-50% for free medical, college and in some countries the clergy of various religions are paid. With the majority of people living paycheck to paycheck this would devastate America.

他們是社會(huì)民主主義者，而我們的民主主義者也希望像他們一樣。通過(guò)更高的稅收來(lái)免費(fèi)一切。在歐洲，我們的工資中有12%到20%用于社會(huì)保障和醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)，40-50%用于免費(fèi)醫(yī)療、大學(xué)，在一些國(guó)家中，連各種宗教的神職人員都要支付。由于大多數(shù)人靠薪水生活，這么做將摧毀美國(guó)的。

jeannniemac
The aim is to reduce the number of food animals and switch humans to bug food.

目的是減少食用動(dòng)物的數(shù)量，并將人類(lèi)轉(zhuǎn)向食用蟲(chóng)子。

jbrewertx
No it will price out live stock products, like the meat, milk, cheese pushing us to being vegans.....and thus lowering the amount of farting cows on the planet...Do you know what produces the most methane on the planet???? TERMITES....

不，它會(huì)給活畜的產(chǎn)品定高價(jià)（如肉、牛奶、奶酪），促使我們成為素食主義者.....從而減少地球上放屁的奶牛數(shù)量......你知道是什么產(chǎn)生地球上最多的甲烷嗎????白蟻….
【price out：排除（某人）：通過(guò)提高價(jià)格將某人排除在外?！?/b>

sudynym
The live weight of all the buffalo in the continental US in 1830 is about the same as the live weight of today's cattle inventory. While the food source and the digestive process for both bovines is identical I assume buffalo are more polite and would "hold it" while eating.

1830 年美國(guó)大陸上所有水牛的活重/毛重與今天存欄家牛的活重大致相同。雖然兩種牛的食物來(lái)源和消化過(guò)程是一樣的，但我認(rèn)為水牛更有禮貌，在進(jìn)食的時(shí)候會(huì)“忍住不放”。

fibonacci1.618
Replying to sudynym

回復(fù)sudynym

Bison, not buffalo.

是野牛，不是水牛。

sudynym
Replying to fibonacci1.618
I can’t “shuffle off to bison!”

我可不能“shuffle off to bison！”
【shuffle off to bison是一首歌的名字】

Viktor53
Tax termites NOW!

馬上對(duì)白蟻征稅！
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

Don'tBeGullible
NO--NO--- the more livestock fart the more tax they will collect.....

不--不---牲畜放的屁越多，他們收的稅就越多.....

The more tax they collect the more money they have to eat beef.

他們征收的稅越多，他們能吃牛肉的錢(qián)就越多。

世界丹麥氣體 農(nóng)場(chǎng)動(dòng)物

很贊 ( 3 )

收藏