@Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam
Independent Legal Banking Consultant at Self-Employment23h
Not worth the cost
The Scammers are geniuses in Economics and Finance
They know high value scams can get them roasted in days
For instance if they went after Adani for ?5000 Crore, they would be caught and hauled up in a week at the most
However the Scammers go for MASS and small numbers
Rather than dupe 1 guy for 10 Million Bucks, they dupe 10,000 guys for 1000 Bucks each


不值得花錢(qián)
騙子都是經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和金融學(xué)的天才
他們知道高額的詐騙行為會(huì)在幾天內(nèi)讓他們吃盡苦頭
例如,如果他們向阿達(dá)尼索要5000億盧比,最多一周就會(huì)被抓獲
然而詐騙者喜歡大規(guī)模和小金額
他們不是騙一個(gè)人1000萬(wàn)美元,而是騙10000個(gè)人,每人1000美元

Now take the Police
Even if they slog and slog and somehow manage to arrest the accused
They need the witness statement of 10,000 guys
It takes 2–3 years to bring a case to trial
By this time all the people who lost their money are OK with it and have resigned themselves to their fate
They certainly don't want to come to court and spend 6–7 hours waiting and maybe get called again and again
Those who do come, get offered 10 times the amount and they end up making VAGUE STATEMENTS that go 180 degrees against the original statements
Ultimately the Scammers get acquitted
Then they start again

現(xiàn)在看警察
即使他們拼盡全力,設(shè)法逮捕了被告
他們需要一萬(wàn)人的證人證詞
案件審理需要2-3年時(shí)間
到那時(shí),所有失去錢(qián)財(cái)?shù)娜硕家呀?jīng)接受了這個(gè)事實(shí),并接受了自己的命運(yùn)
他們當(dāng)然不想來(lái)到法庭,花6-7個(gè)小時(shí)等待,甚至可能被一次又一次地傳喚
那些來(lái)的人,得到了10倍的報(bào)酬,最終卻做出了與原先說(shuō)法截然相反的含糊聲明
最終詐騙者被無(wú)罪釋放
然后他們又重新開(kāi)始

Scammers get your account information from Banks through the BPO side
They target customers who won't be devastated if they lose ?30–40K
Targets are angry for a few days, a week maybe two and then they shrug it off and go back to their life
Police don't strike when the iron is hot
They start after 1–2 years by which time the Target has long forgotten the issue
By this time he simply doesn't want to waste too much time and won't come to 4–5 sessions with the Prosecution

詐騙者通過(guò)地下渠道從銀行獲取你的賬戶信息
他們的目標(biāo)客戶是那些即使損失3-4萬(wàn)盧比也不會(huì)感到沮喪的客戶
目標(biāo)人物會(huì)生氣幾天、一周甚至兩周,然后他們就會(huì)聳聳肩,回到自己的生活中
警察不會(huì)趁熱打鐵
它們會(huì)在1-2年后才開(kāi)始,那時(shí)目標(biāo)早已忘記了這個(gè)問(wèn)題
到這個(gè)時(shí)候,他只是不想浪費(fèi)太多時(shí)間,不會(huì)參加與檢察官、警察和法庭聽(tīng)證會(huì)的4-5次會(huì)議

Cops and hearings before the court
Imagine they are NRIs in US??
They need to pay more for the tickets to come to India
Wold you testify for a loss of ?1 Lakh four years ago by spending ?5–6?
No right
The Cost Benefit Analysis never works in favor of the Victims or Law enforcement
It's why Scammers flourish on CARELESS PEOPLE

想象一下他們是美國(guó)的非居民印度人??
他們需要支付更多的錢(qián)趕來(lái)印度
您會(huì)因?yàn)樗哪昵?-6千盧比的損失而花費(fèi)10萬(wàn)盧比嗎?
當(dāng)然不會(huì)
成本效益分析永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)有利于受害者或執(zhí)法部門(mén)
這就是為什么詐騙者利用粗心大意的人