Women seeking asylum in UK allege sexual abuse in mixed-sex hotels
-Claims of sexual violence made against other asylum seekers and staff include case of a 14-year-old who was allegedly raped
Women and girls seeking asylum in Britain have alleged that they were raped, sexually assaulted and harassed after being placed in mixed Home Office accommodation.
An Observer investigation has uncovered claims of sexual violence at multiple Home Office hotels including allegations against fellow asylum seekers as well as hotel staff.
In one case, a 14-year-old girl was allegedly groomed and raped after being separated from her mother at a hotel housing mostly single men in south-west England. The girl’s mother, speaking on condition of anonymity, told the Observer that her daughter had previously experienced abuse and was “extremely vulnerable”.
Despite this, she and her sibling were placed in a different room to her, across the corridor, next door to a group of men. The mother said she repeatedly raised concerns with hotel staff and asked for her children to be moved into her room, but was told this was not possible. When she tried to keep her door propped open at night so she could keep watch on them, she says she was told by staff that it must be closed.
The girl is said to have been targeted by a man from the neighbouring room who gave her food and invited her into his room. The alleged rape was only discovered months later, in October 2023, after the girl began suffering gynaecological problems.
Her mother claimed failings by the Home Office had allowed the man to “prey on her” daughter. “The security was lax in the hotel where they put us. There were fights, constant smoking in the rooms, screaming, fighting, arguing. It was horrible. I said, ‘I’m not comfortable because my children are not with me’.”
The hotel was later closed. The Home Office said it was “extremely concerned” about the case and was investigating. The mother said it seemed as though the Home Office “knew what they did was wrong” because when the original hotel closed down, the family was moved to a women-only hotel.
In another case, a pregnant woman supported by the charity Rape Crisis was housed in a mixed-sex hostel and remained living there after her baby was born. She described single men, living in the neighbouring rooms, who would “drink together and smoke different things”, and said she was often followed.
Another woman, also supported by Rape Crisis, was placed in mixed accommodation, even after she disclosed being trafficked for sexual exploitation. After she arrived in the UK, the woman, from Sierra Leone, found herself subjected to further abuse from an individual whom she had previously trusted, so was taken to a “safe house” while she waited for her asylum claim to be processed.
In reality, this was a hostel housing both men and women, including people using drugs. She told the charity it was “the most scary seven months” of her life.
The cases have prompted calls for urgent action by the Home Office to tackle “systemic failures to protect women and children from sexual violence in asylum accommodation”. Ciara Bergman, chief executive of Rape Crisis, said the failings amounted to a “scandal”.
Sarah Collier, a human rights solicitor at Irwin Mitchell, said the firm was seeing “a lot of issues with women in asylum accommodation”, including that people were being housed in mixed hotels even when they had disclosed being victims of sexual abuse in their home countries or on the journey to Britain.
She said that in cases where a resident had a criminal background, they were often contained and the Home Office tried to deport them. But in cases where complaints were raised by fellow hotel residents, very little was done.
In the case involving the girl who was allegedly groomed and raped, she said her mother had “raised concerns more than once that were not heeded”. “There was a man in the room next door to the daughter’s room, a single man. He was an adult, and he effectively started to groom the daughter. The mother would see it; she would make them leave their door open during the day.”
“You wouldn’t put someone who has been fleeing domestic violence from a male perpetrator into a mixed hostel. The Home Office is very well aware of the risk.”
Charities and support groups have long raised concerns about the safety of women in asylum accommodation. These include that women and girls are being forced to share spaces – including bathrooms – with strangers, and that women who have fled sexual violence and abuse in their home countries have been forced to live in mixed accommodation where they have faced further sexual violence and threats of sexual violence – including from staff.
The full scale of the abuse remains unclear because the Home Office has failed in its duty to comply with freedom of information laws, refusing a request to supply basic data about the number of reports of sexual violence in asylum accommodation without providing any reason for the refusal.
It also refused to provide data on the number of staff accused of sexual misconduct, and the number dismissed as a result, because it said it did not hold easily accessible information on staff complaints about sexual misconduct and that to get the figures would require a “manual trawl”. It subsequently failed to share the outcome of an internal review without providing any explanation, despite this being due two months ago.
Research by charities indicates the problems are widespread. A recent survey by Women for Refugee Women found almost a quarter of women had been subjected to sexual harassment or abuse from another hotel resident, while 12% had experienced this from hotel staff.
Of the 59 women who were surveyed, 81% said they were in a mixed hotel. Two-thirds of those said they would have preferred to be in a women-only hotel or a hotel with women-only spaces and floors.
The Observer was also told about multiple claims of sexual abuse that were allegedly perpetrated by staff. In one case, a woman who fled Iran due to threats against her life from the Iranian Revolutionary Guards was placed in hostel-style initial accommodation, where she stayed for two years. According to Rape Crisis, the charity supporting her, she was groomed and sexually exploited by two staff members, including one who invited her to his home.
She reported his behaviour and this was reported to the Home Office and accommodation provider, leading to the man being suspended temporarily. But there was “no effective route to follow up after the complaint had been submitted” and the woman “was not directly contacted about the progress of the investigation or the outcome of her complaint”, the charity said. The perpetrator stayed working at the hostel and faced no further action.
Another worker at a Home Office hotel accused of sexually exploiting a female asylum seeker went on to groom another victim after the initial allegations were not investigated.
Gemma Lousley, policy and research manager at Women for Refugee Women, said that as well as the most serious cases, the charity also often heard about “very insidious but really distressing … lower level behaviours” that “seem to happen really routinely”. These included “knock and walks”, where “male staff members knock on the door and just walk in, before the woman has given a response to say it’s OK to come in”.
She called for a “more preventative approach”, including more robust reporting processes. “Hopefully, any government interested in tackling violence against women and girls, and particularly this government who have made it really clear that it’s a priority, would include asylum-seeking women within that. Clearly, one thing that would really help that is women being offered the choice of women-only accommodation,” she said.
In 2023, the Women and Equalities Committee raised the same issues: “The Home Office should conduct an urgent review of safeguarding policies and practices across all asylum support contracts, to ensure the asylum support contracts safeguarding frxwork is being consistently and effectively implemented in all settings. It should publish its review and an action plan within three months.”
A Home Office spokesperson said: “Protecting the health and safety of women and girls in the asylum system is of paramount importance, and we are very clear that our mission to halve violence against women and girls applies to all women in the UK, no matter their circumstances or their background.
“We are therefore extremely concerned at the incident reported to have taken place in 2022, and we will thoroughly investigate any other reports that are passed to us, together with our contracted accommodation providers.
Careless_Agency5365
I don’t think it’s any surprise that when people are from cultures where sexual assault is more common that this will happen.
Question then becomes why staff where not given training to combat that
Pabrinex
It seems it would be much safer and more equitable to deport these people rather than exposing them to unsafe conditions.
似乎將這些人驅(qū)逐出境比將他們暴露在不安全的環(huán)境中更安全、更公平。
OldLondon
Send em back to Gaza - it’s much safer
把他們送回加沙——那里安全多了
ButteryBoku123England
The real question is why are we allowing these people into our country if they’re going to cause harm like this? The second question is who is responsible?
oXXsnowflakeXXo
Wait, I thought we didn’t have enough money for disabled people in the UK? How come we have enough money to care for rapists and paedophiles?
asjonesy99Glamorganshire
Obviously there’s a culture mismatch with a lot of asylum seekers, but it’s not a great look either that the hotel staff seem to be getting involved as well.
顯然,我們與許多尋求庇護(hù)者的文化不匹配,但酒店員工似乎也卷入其中,這也不太好。
new_yorks_alrite
Welcome to the UK! Next time pay for own accommodation.
Im sorry I know this is a horrid thing to say, but I have to pay for my own bills, I dont get free housing from any country, let alone one that Im not a citizen of.
Astriania
The abusers should be reported, arrested and their asylum claims immediately denied on the basis that they're not safe people to invite into our society.
That would stop it happening overnight.
Edit: or if it's the staff, obviously they should be subject to the existing laws against this kind of thing
I don’t think it’s any surprise that when people are from cultures where sexual assault is more common that this will happen.
Question then becomes why staff where not given training to combat that
當(dāng)人們來自性侵犯更普遍的文化中時(shí),這種情況就會(huì)發(fā)生,我認(rèn)為這并不奇怪。
那么問題就變成了為什么員工沒有接受培訓(xùn)來解決這個(gè)問題
At this stage it should be government staff not hotel minimum wage staff there to check people in and clean rooms.
在這個(gè)階段,應(yīng)當(dāng)安排政府工作人員,而不是拿最低工資的酒店工作人員來檢查住客入住和打掃房間。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
It seems it would be much safer and more equitable to deport these people rather than exposing them to unsafe conditions.
似乎將這些人驅(qū)逐出境比將他們暴露在不安全的環(huán)境中更安全、更公平。
Send em back to Gaza - it’s much safer
把他們送回加沙——那里安全多了
The real question is why are we allowing these people into our country if they’re going to cause harm like this? The second question is who is responsible?
真正的問題是,如果這些人會(huì)造成這樣的傷害,我們?yōu)槭裁匆试S他們進(jìn)入我們的國家?第二個(gè)問題是誰應(yīng)該對(duì)此負(fù)責(zé)?
Wait, I thought we didn’t have enough money for disabled people in the UK? How come we have enough money to care for rapists and paedophiles?
等等,我們不是沒有足夠的錢給英國的殘疾人嗎?我們?cè)趺磿?huì)有足夠的錢來照顧強(qiáng)奸犯和戀童癖者?
Then they should sod off back to where they came from. I had lots of sympathy for genuine asylum seekers, that has now totally gone.
那么他們應(yīng)該滾回他們來自的地方。我對(duì)真正的尋求庇護(hù)者有很多同情,但現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)完全沒有了。
Obviously there’s a culture mismatch with a lot of asylum seekers, but it’s not a great look either that the hotel staff seem to be getting involved as well.
顯然,我們與許多尋求庇護(hù)者的文化不匹配,但酒店員工似乎也卷入其中,這也不太好。
Welcome to the UK! Next time pay for own accommodation.
Im sorry I know this is a horrid thing to say, but I have to pay for my own bills, I dont get free housing from any country, let alone one that Im not a citizen of.
歡迎來到英國!下次自己付住宿費(fèi)。
很抱歉,我知道這是一件可怕的事情,但我必須支付自己的賬單,我沒有從任何國家得到免費(fèi)的住房,更不用說那些我不是公民的國家了。
The abusers should be reported, arrested and their asylum claims immediately denied on the basis that they're not safe people to invite into our society.
That would stop it happening overnight.
Edit: or if it's the staff, obviously they should be subject to the existing laws against this kind of thing
施虐者應(yīng)該被舉報(bào)、逮捕,他們的庇護(hù)申請(qǐng)應(yīng)該立即被拒絕,理由是邀請(qǐng)他們進(jìn)入我們的社會(huì)不安全。
這將在一夜之間阻止此類事件發(fā)生。
PS:或者如果是員工,顯然他們應(yīng)該遵守禁止這種行為的現(xiàn)行法律
Can’t wait for them to be allowed to integrate, that’s what’s gonna happen right? They’ll just integrate smoothly? No issues
等不及讓他們?nèi)谌肷鐣?huì)了,這就是將要發(fā)生的事,對(duì)吧?它們會(huì)很順利地融合嗎?沒有問題
I'll looking forward to cancelling Easter and Christmas for my son... So we don't upset our new friends
我盼望著取消復(fù)活節(jié)和我兒子的圣誕節(jié)……這樣我們就不會(huì)讓新朋友們不高興了(譯注:諷刺移民宗教)
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處