史蒂夫·喬布斯和史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克共同創(chuàng)立了蘋果公司,為何史蒂夫·喬布斯比史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克富有得多?
Why was Steve Jobs so much richer than Steve Wozniak even though they founded Apple together?譯文簡介
喬布斯和沃茲誰更富有呢?單單從金錢方面可以看出喬布斯更加富有吧,但是他們倆誰更幸福呢?金錢可以決定一個人的幸福程度嗎?
正文翻譯
圖
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 0 )
收藏
1.Paul Denlinger
I watch what he does, and listen to what he says. And I read books about him.
Aman Gupta
, former Machine Learning Engineer at Apple (2016-2019) and Matt Sephton
, former Technology Evangelist at Apple
Steve Jobs bought Pixar.
Pixar went public in 1995, right after the release of Toy Story. Steve Jobs made his first billion off that IPO.
Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997 and became CEO. Eventually, he was offered a very generous stock package.
Later, Disney bought Pixar, making Steve Jobs Disney's largest single shareholder.
Steve Wozniak did not do any of those things.
我看過喬布斯做過什么,聽過他說過什么,并且也讀過他寫過的書。
史蒂夫·喬布斯買下了皮克斯。
1995年皮克斯上市,在《玩具總動員》上映之后,史蒂夫·喬布斯就從IPO中賺了第一個10億美元。
1997年史蒂夫·喬布斯重返蘋果,成為首席執(zhí)行官,最終,他得到了一筆非常慷慨的股票。
后來,迪士尼收購了皮克斯,這使得史蒂夫·喬布斯成為了迪士尼僅有的一個最大的股東。而史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克沒有做過這些事情。
Woz also gave away most of his money to charity.
史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克還把大部分錢捐給了慈善機構。
And no one is making movies / writing books on him or consider him as an example to live by. “Net worth” is the standard of values, sadly.
令人難過的是,“凈資產(chǎn)”是衡量一個人價值的標準,沒有人以史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克為題材拍電影或寫書,也沒有人把他當作生活的榜樣。
He himself credits Steve for his showmanship and it's his words that Apple wouldn't have taken off otherwise. It's sad but true that woz couldn't have sold a single apple PC back in the day on his own. It was jobs who brought the persistence and product-centricity into the company.
史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克自己也稱贊史蒂夫·喬布斯的感染力,他說如果沒有喬布斯,蘋果就不會如此成功。這么說雖然很悲傷,但是事實就是如此,當年沃茲一個人連一臺蘋果個人電腦都賣不出去,也正是此時,喬布斯把堅持不懈和以產(chǎn)品為中心帶入了公司,才賣出了蘋果電腦。
Woz gave away a lot of his stock to Apple employees who played a role in Apple's success. Woz felt they deserved stock and Steve didn't. I think woz gave something like $10m in stock away to co-workers. $10m was considered a ton of money back then. A shit ton. Still is, but you get my point. Woz is the Man.
那些為蘋果的成功做出貢獻的員工,沃茲認為他們應該得到股票,沃茲把自己的很多股票送給了他們,沃茲給了同事1000萬美元的股票,1000萬美元無論是在那時還是在現(xiàn)在都是一筆不小的錢。但是史蒂夫卻不這么認為。
Actually I agree with this more than with the original answer. If Wozniak had held on to his shares he would today be would certainly be worth more than Jobs notwithstanding Pixar etc which Jobs had to do after he divested himself substantially of Apple. Although to be fair if Jobs had not sold his shares and left to begin with he (now his estate) would have been the richest on earth so both deserve some credit for standing up for something.
關于為何沃茲沒有史蒂夫更富有的原因,實際上,我更認同沃茲將股票讓出給為蘋果的成功做出過貢獻的員工,而不認同是因為史蒂夫買下了皮克斯,而沃茲并沒有買下皮克斯的原因。盡管喬布斯在被剝奪了蘋果的大量股份后不得不買下了皮克斯,但是,如果沃茲尼亞克一直持有他在蘋果的股份,他今天肯定會比喬布斯更有錢。公平一點說,如果喬布斯沒有賣掉他的股份并離開,他(現(xiàn)在是他的遺產(chǎn))將會是世界上最富有的人,所以他們兩個人都為某些事而挺身而出,他們兩個人都該受到贊美。
Steve Wozniak didn't care much about money. But he did the work while Steve Jobs blabbered a lot!
史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克不是很在乎錢。他在喬布斯還在努力奮斗時就已經(jīng)完成了自己的工作。
Curiously, this was not the case before Jobs bought Pixar and started Next. Steve and Steve both unloaded a lot of their Apple stock in the early 80's. (Woz first) The stock was priced in the (as I recall - it's been a long time) 60-70 Dollar range when Woz sold his. Later, when Steve (Jobs) sold his it was valued at $17. This is from memory, but pretty close to accurate. Woz actually made more money per share from Apple than Jobs, at least at that point in time. Both Steves had left Apple, for a while. When Jobs returned it was under very different circumstances. As with all questions, timing and context are everything. If you posed the question in the mid 80's and simply looked at market timing, Woz appeared to be a much more astute businessman than Jobs. His Apple stock was worth about 3 times as much as Jobs' when they each sold.
沃茲和喬布斯在80年代初都拋售了蘋果大量的股票,在我的記憶中(雖然有些模糊,但是非常接近事實)首先拋售蘋果大量股票的是沃茲,我記得沃茲賣出他的股票時,當時的股價在60-70美元之間,后來,喬布斯才拋售他在蘋果的大量股票時,股票的價值是17美元??梢钥闯?,沃茲從蘋果公司每股賺到的錢比喬布斯賺到的錢的還多,至少在那時是這樣的,令人奇怪的是,沃茲和喬布斯都離開了蘋果公司一段時間,在喬布斯收購皮克斯并開始了下一階段的職業(yè)經(jīng)歷之后,沃茲該比喬布斯更富有才對,而當喬布斯回到蘋果后,反倒是喬布斯比沃茲更富有了。如果你在80年代中期提出為何喬布斯比沃茲更富有這個問題,沃茲和喬布斯賣出蘋果股票時,沃茲賣出的股價大約是喬布斯賣出的股價的三倍,若只看市場時機,沃茲似乎是一個比喬布斯更加精明的商人,所以,與所有問題一樣,所有的問題答案都與問題提出的時機和背景有著莫大的關系,甚至不同時機和背景下問題的答案截然不同。
Woz is a friend of a friend of mine. My short answer would be that he did not care much about money, and still became rich beyond his wildest dreams, so he bailed out early.
沃茲是我朋友的朋友,具我所了解到的是,沃茲對錢根本不太在意,所以沃茲很早就退出蘋果了,但他還是出人意料地富有。
I’ve met Woz twice, been out to eat with him, and even was shocked when he responded to a Facebook comment I posted. He really is a genuinely nice person. Fame and money don’t interest him much. Remember — he wanted to give away the plans for the first Apple for free until Jobs insisted there was money to be made.
我曾見過沃茲兩次,也和他一起出去吃過飯,甚至當他回復我在Facebook上發(fā)表的一條評論我都驚呆了。沃茲真是一個非常好的人,他對名利不太感興趣。我們應該記得的是,沃茲曾想將第一代蘋果的設計方案免費提供給大家,但是喬布斯卻堅持想讓第一代蘋果的設計方案掙錢。
Lol. Woz is your friend. Proofs please.
哈哈。沃茲是你的朋友 ,請證明。
Reading comprehension? He is the ex-brother-in-law of a friend. I said "friend of a friend."
閱讀理解嗎?他是一個朋友的前姐夫。我說的是"朋友的朋友。"
Jobs would eat and kill his own for a dollar. Woz would not.
為了一美元,喬布斯都會努力爭取,而沃茲就不會。
No businessman or person has ever become a billionaire without being ruthless. One way or the other, sacrifices has to be made to be and stay on top.
沒有一個商人或一個人在成為億萬富翁之前不冷酷的,不管怎樣,要想保持領先的地位,就必須做出相應的犧牲。
This is not true. There are lots of Billinoirs who did were not as ruthless as Steve Jobs.
你說的不對,有那么多的億萬富翁,但都沒有史蒂夫·喬布斯那么無情。
You are right,he did not do any of those things,plus he sold off his stock early because he wanted to focus on just the technical part of computers. I believe that is why he did what he did and was not as rich as Jobs. This is,of course,from what I have read on Wikipedia.
你說的對,沃茲確實沒有做過買下皮克斯等一系列事情,再加上沃茲一心只想專注于計算機的技術部分,很早就賣掉了他在蘋果的股票。我認為這就是為什么沃茲沒有像喬布斯那樣富有的原因,因為沃茲只是做了他想做的事,而非只是為了掙錢。我上面所說的事情,是我在維基百科上看到的。
They were two individuals with different characteristics which ultimatley led to different bank balances, the media always judge success pounds and dollars. They should be celebrating and discussing when what they should be talking about is the overall remarkleable achievement of two great men.. Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak. My Facebook friend Woz has a net worth of $100 million.. when is enough money ever enough?
史蒂夫·喬布斯和史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克是兩個具有不同特征的人,正因如此,才導致了他們兩個人的富有程度不同,媒體總是以英鎊和美元來衡量一個人的成功,我認為媒體應該慶祝和討論兩個偉大人物所取得的顯著成就,而非討論沃茲和喬布斯誰更富有。我的Facebook好友沃茲擁有著1億美元的凈資產(chǎn)……如果這都不算富有,那么到底需要擁有多少錢才算足夠富有呢?
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Good points. Sure, Jobs had the bigger bank account, and the higher public profile, but I think Woz was and is a happier person. Probably a function of personality.
說的挺好,確實!喬布斯比沃茲更富有,并且公眾形象也更高,但是我認為沃茲卻是比喬布斯更快樂的人,過去是,現(xiàn)在也是,這或許就是人格的魅力吧。
From your descxtion, it seems like Steve made more money from Disney/Pixar than Apple. Is this correct?
你的意思看起來像是史蒂夫從迪士尼/皮克斯上賺的錢似乎比從蘋果上賺的錢還多,這么說是否正確呢?
Correct. It's pretty widely documented that Apple made him a millionaire but Pixar made him a billionaire.
這是對的。蘋果公司讓喬布斯成為了百萬富翁,而皮克斯公司卻讓他成為了億萬富翁。
He sold his Apple stock right after leaving Apple and then in 2002 when price was low. So he didn't make much money from Apple.
在2002年股價較低的時候,喬布斯賣掉了離開蘋果后持有的股票,所以,他并沒有從蘋果賺到很多錢。
Almost certainly correct
幾乎可以肯定的是,你說的是正確的。
If he had lived longer this may have swung to more on the Apple side given their continued success.
如果喬布斯能夠活的更久一點的話,由于蘋果長期以來的成功,他可能會更加傾向于蘋果這一邊。
, finance geek, MBA, ran a fintech company.
Jim Dovey
, tvOS Senior Engineer at Apple (2020-present) and
Vladimir Novakovski
, Silicon Valley CTO and Advisor
Biggest portion of Steve Jobs wealth was not because he founded Apple. In 1985 he sold all his shares for millions and just kept 1 share to get an annual report. That is the same year Steve Wozniak too left the company again with millions worth in stocks, but not billions. So we are mostly even at this point. After Apple, Jobs went on to found Pixar and when it went public that is when Steve Jobs became a billionaire. After Apple, Woz didn’t go on to build a similarly successful company. In the meanwhile the company went on through a decade of bad patch that destroyed the value of their Apple stocks and whatever stake the early employees had was diluted.
史蒂夫·喬布斯的財富最大來源并不是因為創(chuàng)立了蘋果公司。1985年,他賣掉了自己在蘋果的所有股票,賺取了數(shù)百萬美元,只留下了1股,以此來獲得一份年報。同年,史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克也帶著價值數(shù)百萬美元的股票再次離開了蘋果公司,而非數(shù)十億美元。所以在這一點上他們從蘋果擁有的財富基本上是相等的。喬布斯在離開了蘋果公司之后,又創(chuàng)辦了皮克斯動畫工作室,皮克斯公司上市后,史蒂夫·喬布斯成為了億萬富翁。沃茲在離開蘋果公司后,并沒有再創(chuàng)建一家同樣成功的公司。并且,他們離開蘋果公司后,蘋果公司經(jīng)歷了十年的低迷期,他們在蘋果公司所持有的股票價值大幅縮水,作為早期員工的他們在蘋果公司所持有的股份也被稀釋。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
最為重要的是,在沃茲離開蘋果公司的22年后,史蒂夫·喬布斯回到了蘋果公司,獲得了新的股份,他把蘋果公司帶到了我們所廣為人知的高度——像Mac OS,iPod,iPhone,iPad等等,這就是蘋果最大的勝利,而蘋果這一最成功的階段沃茲并沒有參與,這就是為什么沃茲沒有喬布斯富有原因。20世紀70年代,喬布斯和沃茲在車庫里創(chuàng)建的蘋果公司,喬布斯的財富并不是因為他們在20世紀70年代在車庫里創(chuàng)建的公司,喬布斯的財富主要是因為在最初創(chuàng)立蘋果公司的30年后出現(xiàn)的iPod和iPhone,沃茲確實是個很棒很好的人,但是如果沒有喬布斯和他的遠見卓識,沃茲不可能如此富有,這一點上需要給喬布斯一個公道。
This goes the same to Steve. Woz’s technical acumen was critical for Steve’s skills and visions of Apple. Without Woz, there was no Apple.
沃茲的技術與智慧對史蒂夫的技能和蘋果的愿景至關重要。沒有沃茲,就沒有蘋果。這一點對于喬布斯也一樣。
The most apt answer I have read about Woz and Jobs. People don’t want to credit Jobs for the success of Apple.
這是我讀到過的有關沃茲和喬布斯最恰當?shù)拇鸢浮H藗儾幌氚烟O果的成功歸功于喬布斯。
Balaji, Jobs wasn't a founder of Pixar. Pixar was a spinoff from Lucasfilm. Jobs founded NeXT after leaving Apple. He invested in Pixar.
巴拉吉,喬布斯不是皮克斯的創(chuàng)始人。皮克斯是從盧卡斯電影公司衍生出來的。喬布斯在離開蘋果后創(chuàng)立了NeXT,投資了皮克斯。
From Wiki:
Pixar began in 1979 as the Graphics Group, part of the Lucasfilm computer division, before its spin-out as a corporation in 1986, with funding by Apple Inc. co-founder Steve Jobs, who became the majority shareholder.
來自于維基百科的說法:
1979年,皮克斯在成為一家公司前,最初是盧卡斯影業(yè)電腦部門的圖形組,1986年,在蘋果公司聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人史蒂夫·喬布斯的資助下成為一家公司,后來,喬布斯成為皮克斯公司的大股東。
One doubt though, didn't the company they founded together in 70’s in that garage started the culture of innovation and pool of talented people that helped the company for its success during its later era of ipods and iphones.
可問題是,蘋果公司在ipod和iphone上之所以取得成功,難到不是由于蘋果公司長期以來儲備的人才和獨特的創(chuàng)新文化嗎?,而這些儲備人才和獨特的創(chuàng)新文化正是因為喬布斯和沃茲在70年代的車庫里共同創(chuàng)建的這家公司才擁有的。
That company and culture was mostly dead by 1990s — it was completely rebuilt by Jobs from 1998. Remember it took 30 years from the first successful Apple machines to iPhones. Majority of their workforce would have retired in the meanwhile even if the company had a normal course.
到20世紀90年代,蘋果公司的文化基本已經(jīng)消亡,1998年喬布斯重新建立了蘋果公司的文化。要知道,從第一臺成功的蘋果電腦到iPhone,這期間經(jīng)歷了30年時間,在此期間,即使蘋果公司有正常的流程,但是,蘋果公司的大多數(shù)員工都已經(jīng)退休了。
2.4.1.1大的Nirmal Manoj
但是你能確信,喬布斯后來的成功,與他當年和沃茲友誼和他們一起做的工作沒有任何關系嗎?
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
One can say this about anything. Your education, people you met, previous ark experience etc. all likely help you be effective later. So what?
這放之四海皆宜的道理,按你這么說,所有的事情都可以這么認為。你之所以取得這些成就,都與你所受的教育、你遇到的人、你曾經(jīng)的工作經(jīng)驗等等有著莫大的關系,這些你所有的經(jīng)歷都在一定程度上幫助你日后變得更加成功。那又如何?
Hii, Balaji Sir,
You are currently my encyclopedia. Every question in my mind, Quota has an answer written by you. How come you have such a deep insight on every topic? Just curious…
Balaji先生,你好!你真的就是我的百科全書,我的所有疑問在你那里都有答案。我只是好奇,為什么你對每個問題都有如此深刻的見解?
Of course, he would do a research in internet before he answered.
那是當然的啦,在回答問題之前,他都會在網(wǎng)上查一下的。
Also Wozniak is quite rich anyhow, by anyone’s standards.
不管以誰的標準來衡量,無論如何,沃茲尼亞克都很富有的。
, Student
Evan Asano
, Entrepreneur, founder and CEO and
Trevor Hatfield
, B2B SaaS Growth. Co-Founder Inturact, Taggg, InnerTrends
Paul earlier gave basically a perfect answer for your question.
Although there is one point that he didn't mention, that I will.
Before Apple Computer held its initial public offering (or IPO) in 1980, Steve Jobs played a bit of a dickish move.
Jobs decided not to grant stock options to a few of the earliest Apple employees - such as Daniel Kottke, Chris Espinosa and Bill Fernandez.
As a result, these men who helped found a soon to be billion dollar company were to make no money from the upcoming IPO, which would be the biggest since Ford Motors in 1956.
Here's what Wozniak did.
Wozniak sold some of his own shares to his friends (at very low prices) because he thought Jobs was being an unfair anal cavity.
雖然之前Paul對你的問題給出了完美的答案,但是有一點我覺得他沒有提到。
蘋果公司在1980年首次公開募股之前,史蒂夫·喬布斯做了一個似乎有點愚蠢的舉動。
喬布斯決定不給蘋果公司早期員工的股票期權,這些早期員工包括丹尼爾·科特基、克里斯·埃斯皮諾薩和比爾·費爾南德斯。 可結果卻是,正是在這些人的幫助下,才使得蘋果公司在美國成為一家市值即將達到10億美元的公司,他們這些人,將是自1956年以來福特汽車最大的IPO,然而,他們卻沒有從即將到來的IPO中賺到錢,與喬布斯不同,沃茲尼亞克是這樣做的。沃茲尼亞克認為喬布斯是壞人,做的事情不公平。所以,沃茲尼亞克把自己的股份以很低的價格賣給了朋友。
- Happy Woz on a Segway.
最后,沃茲尼亞克的股份比喬布斯少了,這也使得沃茲尼亞克在后期的IPO中賺的錢比喬布斯少。史蒂夫·喬布斯最終也非常明智地投資了皮克斯動畫工作室,這使得皮克斯公司在首次公開募股時,喬布斯就賺了10億美元。喬布斯在1985年離開蘋果后,創(chuàng)立了一家自己的電腦公司,取名叫“NeXT”。當史蒂夫·喬布斯最終回到蘋果時,又獲得了一大筆股票,這使得他又賺了大概2000萬或3000萬美元。所以啊,正是由于沃茲尼亞克的慷慨,再加上喬布斯后期又投資的公司,才使得喬布斯的身價達到了80億美元左右。而史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克的凈資產(chǎn)如今估計在1億美元左右即便如此,沃茲尼亞克仍然比大多數(shù)人富有,并且他有很多的愛好,比如騎賽格威。這是一張沃茲在開著賽格威的照片,能看得出來他非??鞓?。
Who is actually richer in any real sense? I don't claim to have met either of them but Woz strikes me as a contented happy person living a great life. Alas poor Steve is dead and so as things stand I would say that Woz is immeasurably richer.
他們到底誰更富有呢?雖然我并沒有見過他們中的任何一個,但是沃茲給我的印象是,他是一個非常偉大、快樂且滿足的人,哎,可憐的史蒂夫死了,就目前情況來看,沃茲比他富有多了。
You are right, but not because he is dead because he got cancer. But while one working for his and other persons happiness, the other one working for his ambitions. If I have to choose (not that I don't love my father) Jobs or Woz as my father, my choice would be Woz.
你說的對,但不是因為喬布斯死于癌癥,而是因為沃茲為自己和他人的幸福而工作,喬布斯卻是為自己的抱負而工作,如果讓我選擇喬布斯和沃茲中的一個作為我的父親(當然我這么說并不是因為我不愛我的父親),我會選擇沃茲。
Yes, but he had a fairly good chance of surviving the cancer if he had put his ego aside and listened to the doctors.
是的,如果喬布斯能夠聽醫(yī)生的話,不那么在意自尊的話,喬布斯還是有很大機會活下來的。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://www.top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Totally this! I'll take an extra 15-20 years alive and well as a hundred millionaire vs being a billionaire anyday!
說的是太對了!我寧愿做個百萬富翁,多活15~20年。而不是做個億萬富翁,卻死了。
Me too. Get me US$5mil, convert it into Indian Rupees I want to live hale and hearty, dont count my years.
我也是,給我百萬美元兌換成印度盧比,我想活的硬朗些,而不是數(shù)著年齡過日子。
Okay. All said, in the ends Jobs couldn't take all his wealth to the other world whereas Wozniak can buy as many Segways as he wanted.
好吧。所有人都說,喬布斯到最后都無法帶著他所有的財富到另外一個世界,而沃茲尼亞克卻可以想買多少輛賽格威就買多少輛。
The world has mostly forgotten the Wozniak name while Jobs’ will be talked about in history and economics books. Steve Jobs made a lasting impression on the world. Steve Wozniak is another fat guy on a Segway.
這個世界幾乎已經(jīng)忘記了沃茲尼亞克的名字,只知道史蒂夫·沃茲尼亞克是一個開著賽格威的胖子。史蒂夫·喬布斯卻給世界留下了深刻的印象,他的名字將會記錄在歷史和經(jīng)濟學書籍。
Having known Woz for many years, I can attest, without a shadow of a doubt, Woz is living a much happier live than Jobs did.I don’t think he measures himself in the sense of how much he is worth. He also doesn’t measure his days by connecting the lines of his conquests. He’d rather spread a little joy.
我認識沃茲很多年了,可以毫無疑問地證明,沃茲現(xiàn)在過著比喬布斯快樂得多的生活。沃茲不會以自己的身價來衡量自己,也不以他征服了世界來衡量自己,他更愿意向世界傳播一點快樂。
Always liked Wozniak. Human guy.
我一直都非常喜歡沃茲尼亞克,他是一個很有人情味的家伙。
_without a shadow of a doubt, Woz is more humanitarian than Jobs_ is truthful. I am sure Jobs loved what he did till the end of his time.
我確信喬布斯直到生命的盡頭都很熱愛他所做的一切,毫無疑問地,沃茲比喬布斯更有人道主義精神。
The stories you read about Jobs make him sound almost inhuman. Brilliant guy. But a seeming disregard for the feelings of those around him. I read a story on his daughter with his first wife where he basically treated her like crap.
聰明的家伙,你了解到的有關喬布斯的故事,似乎讓他聽起來沒有人性,但是你似乎忽視了喬布斯周圍人的感受。我曾經(jīng)讀過一篇有關于他女兒和他第一任妻子的故事,喬布斯非常寵愛他的家人,幾乎把她當廢物一樣對待。
, worked at Apple
Erik Fair
, former Postmaster, Hostmaster, software/network engineer at Apple (1988-1997) and
Connor Hendrix
, former Software Engineer at Apple
Woz did a lot of coasting on his Apple money. The other companies he founded were not massively successful. Jobs, after being kicked out of Apple founded a multibilliondallr company, Pixar, which he sold to Disney, and a second multibillion dollar company, NeXT, which he ended up selling to Apple, and which heralded his return to Apple. Woz never was hugely strong on the business side of things. But don’t worry, he’s not living in a cardboard boz eating cat food.
沃茲在蘋果公司上花了很多錢,他創(chuàng)立的其他公司都沒有取得巨大成功。喬布斯在被趕出蘋果公司后,創(chuàng)立了兩家公司,分別是皮克斯和NeXT,這兩家公司價值都是數(shù)十億美元。后來,喬布斯將皮克斯賣給了迪士尼,而NeXT 則賣給了蘋果公司,這也標志著他重返蘋果。在商業(yè)方面,沃茲從來都不是很強。但是也不用擔心,沃茲又不是住在紙板箱里面吃貓糧的貓。
He never founded Pixar. That was spun out of Industrial Light and Magic, from Lucasfilm. Steve Jobs just bought it for less than 10M in the 80s
喬布斯從來沒有創(chuàng)建過皮克斯,喬布斯是從盧卡斯影業(yè)的工業(yè)光魔公司衍生出來,在80年代史蒂夫·喬布斯用了不到1000萬美元買下了它。
Woz also sold a lot of his tock to other early employees when Jobs wouldn’t give them any authorize any stock for them.
那時喬布斯不給蘋果早期員工的任何股票授權,沃茲把自己的股票賣給了其他早期員工。
Do you honestly think Steve Jobs didn’t sell any stock, and was able to live on he $1/year salary?
你真的認為史蒂夫·喬布斯沒有賣出任何股票,僅僅依靠一年一美元的薪水生活嗎?
, Read everything there is about Steve Jobs
Shilpi Khanna
, Content Editor at Apple (2017-present) and
Jim Dovey
, tvOS Senior Engineer at Apple (2020-present)
Steve Jobs sold all but one of his stocks in Apple when he left in 1985, when Apple stock was at an all time low. He founded NeXT and was the majority owner when Apple bought the company, though at that point he was almost out of money, on the brink of bankruptcy. He also bought Pixar and it has been rolling out blockbusters every other year for 20 years. He also invested in other companies. Toy Story alone made Steve Jobs a billionaire because Pixar was publicly traded company. Woz on the other hand gave away a lot of his stock. He financed more than a few huge rock concerts that lost a lot of money. He started a company making remote controls that failed and lost money. He got divorced more than a few times. He helps old Apple employees that are out of luck and deal with sickness. He gives away a lot of his money. But you don't need to worry about him, he still has a lot and he is according to everyone who actually knows him, a super nice guy. He was never in it to have money, he just wanted a computer that he could fiddle with.
在1985年,史蒂夫·喬布斯離開蘋果時蘋果的股票處于歷史最低點,他賣掉了他持有的所有股票,只剩下一股。而后創(chuàng)立了NEXT,蘋果公司收購NeXT時,喬布斯是該公司的大股東,盡管當時他幾乎沒有錢,處于破產(chǎn)的邊緣。喬布斯還收購了皮克斯,因為皮克斯是一家上市公司,之后的20年期間,皮克斯每隔一年就推出一部大片,單是《玩具總動員》就使史蒂夫·喬布斯成為了億萬富翁,喬布斯還投資了其他公司。 相比之下,沃茲在拋出大量蘋果股票后,資助了幾場大型搖滾音樂會,這些音樂會損失了很多錢;另外,沃茲還創(chuàng)辦了一家制造遙控器的公司,但是也失敗了,還虧了錢;他還離婚過好幾次,還幫助健康不佳的蘋果老員工治療疾病,還捐出了好多錢。但是無需擔心他,他仍然有很多錢,每個真正了解他的人說,他是一個超級好的人,他努力從來都不是為了錢,只是想要一臺他可以擺弄的電腦。
Makes you wonder, which of the two ended up happier. The one that Held his money closely and used it to create an empire or the one who used his money to create happiness in others and to help those in need. I think I know which one I would rather be. I guess that's why I am not a Billionaire... or a millionaire... Or a thousandaire...
不禁讓人感到好奇的是,他們倆到底誰最后更幸福呢?一個是僅僅攥著自己的錢,創(chuàng)造了一個帝國的人,而另一個是用自己的錢為別人創(chuàng)造幸福,幫助那些需要幫助的人。我想我知道我更愿意成為誰了,我大概能夠明白為什么我不是億萬富翁或者一個百萬富翁……或者是千元富翁……
Everybody is different, I don't think Steve Jobs would have been happy tinkering away on his hobbies. Who knows how happy either of them has been. I bet Woz has had ups and downs just like the rest of us.
每個人都是不一樣的,我認為史蒂夫·喬布斯很樂意在自己的愛好上修修補補。誰知道他們倆有多幸福呢,我敢打賭沃茲也和我們一樣有過起起落落的生活。
Woz is to Tesla, and Jobs is to Edison!
沃茲是特斯拉,喬布斯是愛迪生!
Oh how wrong you are. Tesla was so much more than Woz that just trying to compare them two is not worthy
哦,你大錯特錯了,特斯拉比沃茲強大得多,所以他們倆沒有可比性。