零元購合法化4周年后，紐約零售店鋪減少了25%
Shoplifting is Destroying NYC… My Honest Thoughts
譯文簡介
大流行結束后，紐約市的零元購經(jīng)濟規(guī)模已達每年44億美元。有人說這是荒謬且不可持續(xù)的，但也有人說犯罪分子只是社會的受害者，這個社會讓他們的生活變得過于昂貴.....
正文翻譯
After the pandemic, New York City's zero-dollar shopping economy has reached $4.4 billion per year. Some say this is ridiculous and unsustainable, but others say criminals are just victims of a society that has made their lives too expensive.....
大流行結束后，紐約市的零元購經(jīng)濟規(guī)模已達每年44億美元。有人說這是荒謬且不可持續(xù)的，但也有人說犯罪分子只是社會的受害者，這個社會讓他們的生活變得過于昂貴.....
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
大流行結束后，紐約市的零元購經(jīng)濟規(guī)模已達每年44億美元。有人說這是荒謬且不可持續(xù)的，但也有人說犯罪分子只是社會的受害者，這個社會讓他們的生活變得過于昂貴.....
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 7 )
收藏
"your hurting the neighborhood" Um... lady, they don't give a SHT about that. They just want money honey.
“你們在傷害鄰里?！?嗯…女士，他們根本不在乎這個。他們只想要錢，親愛的。
The bliss of being so short sighted... they don't even realize their myopic greed will result in not even having stores to rob...
目光短淺的幸福…他們甚至沒有意識到自己狹隘的貪婪將導致連商店都沒有搶劫了…
@radagast7200 they live for today. Most fools font think beyond their next meal
他們只活在當下。大多數(shù)傻子只考慮下一頓飯。
You voting for it!
你在投票支持它！
@radagast7200 Bless those thieves. They are showing you the mirror.
祝福那些小偷。他們給你照了一面鏡子。
Lol, victim's of their own greed, sell a jacket for 50 bucks, buy a sandwich and some deodorant for 40, woohoo 10 extra bucks!
哈哈，貪婪的受害者，把一件夾克賣50美元，買一個三明治和一些除臭劑花40美元，哇，多賺了10美元！
@dukenukemforever6912 and when they complain about 'food deserts', we get to ignore them, right?
當他們抱怨“食物荒漠”時，我們可以忽略他們，對吧？
I think it's more a matter of her realizing that it will take a concerted community-wide effort to do something about the problem. That means government needs to help. It's a call for help. And it should be heeded immediately.
我認為這更多是她意識到需要社區(qū)共同努力來解決這個問題。這意味著政府需要提供幫助。這是一種求助的呼吁，應該立即得到重視。
You can blame the New York State assembly!!!! One party Democrat rule!!!!!
你可以責怪紐約州議會?。。?！一黨民主黨統(tǒng)治?。?！
Like California. One party rule!!
就像加利福尼亞。一黨統(tǒng)治??！
Like Florida. One party rule
就像佛羅里達。一黨統(tǒng)治
And who put them into office?
那誰把他們推上臺的？
Thank you Defund-a-crats
謝謝你們這些“削減資金的民主黨人”
@max-xn3vt Oh? That going on in Florida, tool? Don't think so. Why don't you move there and find out?
哦？這在佛羅里達發(fā)生嗎？我不這么認為。為什么不搬到那里去看看呢？
"ThankyouDemocrats!!!" criminals
“謝謝你們，民主黨人?。?！” 犯罪分子
@max-xn3vt Florida is not quite as one party rule as NY or CA, but it appears that the party that is ruling it at least has some semblance of understanding how the worlds works, including unintended consequences and reality vs desire. Although far from perfect, managing to improve the state instead of burning it to the ground with faux moral grandstanding
佛羅里達的情況并不像紐約或加州那樣一黨統(tǒng)治，但看來執(zhí)政的黨派至少對世界的運作有一定的理解，包括意外后果和現(xiàn)實與愿望之間的差距。雖然遠非完美，但至少在改進州的狀況，而不是通過虛偽的道德姿態(tài)將其燒成廢墟。
NYC gets what it deserves. They keep voting for it.
紐約市得到了它應得的。他們一直在為此投票。
When people keep voting for the same Dumb Ass Politicians what else do they expect !
當人們一直投票給同樣的愚蠢政客，他們還期待什么呢！
Yep
沒錯
Nah ....The other party is worse ..This is a Store issue....Let them deal with it ..They can hire security if they want and there are element of govt that are complicit as they keep the police away...How u don't have police presence in midtown is beyond me .
不……另一個黨派更糟……這是一個商店問題……讓他們處理吧……他們可以雇傭保安，如果他們愿意，還有政府的某些部門也有勾結，他們讓警察遠離……我無法理解為什么市中心沒有警察存在。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
@sylvestersmith5072 store issue? then why doesn't it happen here in Iowa? Don't be blind.
商店問題？那為什么在愛荷華州不會發(fā)生這種事？別盲目。
Not they, independents and real republicans vote against this, I for one think the state will go red soon or secede from NYC, Staten Island too.The eastern part of Coney Island is a city not connected to NYC,look it up
不是他們，獨立人士和真正的共和黨人反對這個。我認為整個州很快會變紅，或者從紐約市分裂出去，包括斯塔滕島?？的釐u東部是一座與紐約市無關的城市，查一下。
It's called Sea Gate,ny,no part of NYC.
這叫做海門（Sea Gate），紐約，并不是紐約市的一部分。
@semmert bc you haven't been hit with migrants yet but not to worry, you should have kept that on the down low
因為你還沒有受到移民的沖擊，但不用擔心，你應該把這點保密。
@semmert lolllll IOWAso you have no theft and no jobs? Nice lol
哈哈哈 愛荷華州所以你們沒有盜竊和工作？不錯哈哈
@sylvestersmith5072 What good is police presence when they've been told not to do anything? Who voted for bail reform? Anything under $1k is a misdemeanor? Keep voting blue if you want but don't be obtuse. This is exactly what you voted for. This is what Harris and Biden have been doing for 3.5 years.
警察的存在有什么用，當他們被告知什么都不能做？誰投票支持保釋改革？任何低于1000美元的犯罪都被定為輕罪？如果你愿意，可以繼續(xù)投票給民主黨，但別再糊涂了。這正是你投票選來的結果。這就是哈里斯和拜登在過去3.5年里所做的。
2020 NYC: Wearing a face mask to protect from COVID, and other diseases
2024 NYC: Wearing a face mask to avoid being recognized while shoplifting ( optional )
2020年紐約市：戴口罩以防新冠病毒和其他疾病
2024年紐約市：戴口罩以避免在偷竊時被認出（可選）
tbh, I wear a mask coz I am ugly and don't want to be looked at. People looked at me al the time even some were so obvious that they turned their heads to stare at me while walking so they hit a pole or a wall.....not sure if am I too attractive or too ugly but I think mostly ugly since I am still single and a virgin.
說實話，我戴口罩是因為我長得丑，不想被看見。人們總是盯著我看，有些人甚至明顯地轉過頭來盯著我看，以至于撞上了路燈或墻壁……我
不確定自己是太吸引人還是太丑，但我覺得大多是丑，因為我仍然單身而且還是處女。
@spika5872 I'm sure you are perfect.
我相信你是完美的。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
@spika5872 Did you ever think of keeping that to yourself? What is it with people and embarrassing themselves online for no reason?
你有沒有想過把這些事作為隱私？為什么人們總是要在網(wǎng)上自我暴露？
I think one of the reasons for the mask mandates was because they were testing facial recognition and developing it to recognize faces despite the nose and mouth being covered. Another theory I've heard was they were hoping enough people would protest that they'd pass anti-masking laws, so that you could get arrested just for wearing one to make it harder for people to avoid facial recognition.
我認為強制戴口罩的原因之一是他們在測試面部識別技術，并且開發(fā)了即使鼻子和嘴巴被遮住也能識別面孔的技術。我還聽說另一種理論是，他們希望足夠多的人抗議，以便通過反口罩法案，這樣你只要戴上口罩就可能被逮捕，從而使人們更難避免面部識別。
@brians1793 All of that could be a reason. Covid was just 1 huge social expiriment for many diffrent things
所有這些都可能是原因之一。新冠疫情只是一個巨大的社會實驗，涉及許多不同的事物。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
@MamaMOB Boomers don’t understand Genz sense of humor.
Also seems that Boomers also don’t understand the internet.
嬰兒潮一代不理解Z世代的幽默。似乎嬰兒潮一代也不理解互聯(lián)網(wǎng)。
Until the political climate in NYC changes, and it won't because there's nobody to enforce that level of change, the place is doomed. There's no reason to go there and every reason to get the hell out.
在紐約市的政治氣候改變之前，它注定會變得糟糕。而且不會改變，因為沒有人來執(zhí)行這種級別的變化。沒有理由去那里，只有離開的理由。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Word on the street is that you can get a free iphone from any New York apple store. Just walk in, smile at the staff, take a iphone and walk out
街頭傳聞，在紐約的任何蘋果店你都能免費獲得一部iPhone。只需走進去，沖工作人員微笑，拿走一部iPhone然后離開。
If it's under $1k probably. Thanks Alvin!
如果低于1000美元的話，可能吧。謝謝，阿爾文！
Ya, just don’t get a pro version and you’ll be under $1000. Though with Apple, those phones supposedly are or will be disabled from ever working.
是的，只要不買Pro版，你就會低于1000美元。不過，蘋果的這些手機據(jù)說已經(jīng)或者將會被禁用，無法使用。
But it won't work it has to go thru a process in the store so I wouldn't buy it out on the street or thru online auctions etc
但它無法正常工作，因為必須通過商店的流程，所以我不會在街上或通過在線拍賣等渠道購買它。
Do I have to smile at the staff?
我必須對工作人員微笑嗎？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
@jerryc5743 yes, unless you want to be perceived as a psychopath?
是的，除非你想被視為心理變態(tài)。
Weird because not all iPhones are factory unlocked so not only do you need the password but you need a carrier with a up to date account and a valid apple account to use the phone you stole. Most people sign contracts for their phone so the carrier controls the available service. If it’s stolen or you miss your bill they lock the phone. Stealing iPhones is only good for parts. But even now I believe Apple is pairing parts to only be used per individual phone. So you can’t sell parts from one phone for another. They wont match and be useless unless Apple does the repair. It’s a glass paperweight
很奇怪，因為并非所有iPhone都是工廠解鎖的，所以你不僅需要密碼，還需要一個更新的運營商賬戶和有效的蘋果賬戶來使用你偷來的手機。大多數(shù)人簽訂手機合同，因此運營商控制著可用服務。如果手機被盜或你錯過了賬單，他們會鎖定手機。
偷iPhone只能用于零件。但即使現(xiàn)在我相信蘋果已經(jīng)將零件與每部手機配對。所以你不能把一部手機的零件賣給另一部手機。它們不會匹配，除非蘋果進行維修，否則會變得毫無用處，只是個玻璃紙鎮(zhèn)。
Cashier at departament store told me the same.
百貨商店的收銀員也告訴我一樣的事。
Surprised they haven't figured out how to censor him yet.
驚訝他們還沒找到辦法來審查他。
He is compensated with $$$$$$.
他得到大量的金錢補償。
@utubewillyman that boy got algorithms galore
那個小子有大量的算法。
@Ir-of4zn so?
@Ir-of4zn 那又怎樣？
I think you're right.
我認為你說得對。
@Ir-of4zn I'm all for it...
我完全支持…
Immigration is working out great
移民政策運作得很好
I see a lot of doctors and lawyers!
我看到很多醫(yī)生和律師！
You don't need lawyers anyways but the rocket scientists would be good
反正你不需要律師，但火箭科學家會很有用。
Illegal criminals not so much!
非法犯罪者就不怎么樣！
To all the citizens of New York city and all other liberal cities, this is exactly what you wanted to happen, otherwise why vote the way you have been for years. You vote in weak Mayors, weak City Councils, weak District Attorneys, you get what you vote for. The citizens of NYC should be happy to get everything you voted for with this mess. There's an old saying "You made your bed, now lie in it"!
對所有紐約市以及其他自由城市的市民來說，這正是你們想要發(fā)生的事情，否則為什么這么多年一直投票支持？
你們選出了軟弱的市長、軟弱的市議會、軟弱的地區(qū)檢察官，你們得到的是你們所投票的結果。紐約市的市民應該高興地接受這場混亂的一切。這有一句老話：“你鋪好了床，現(xiàn)在就躺在上面吧”！
My last visit to NYC this summer was terrible. Smelled bad, costs too much for anything, businesses closed or gone, homeless people exposing themselves or causing a nuisance on the streets and subway. Who would want to live there?
我今年夏天最后一次去紐約市的經(jīng)歷很糟糕。味道很差，什么都太貴，商店關門或消失，無家可歸的人在街道和地鐵上暴露自己或造成麻煩。誰還想住在那里？
@Kemulnitestryker This is exactly what you get when you vote for a bunch of idiots and morons
這正是你投票給一群傻瓜和笨蛋所得到的結果
@TheMightyZim Don’t worry, just wait till you see what happens when the other side gets control
別擔心，等著看另一邊掌權后的結果吧
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
@noahs9 The other side’s only argument is that the current side is bad, and they’ll be just as bad or worse.
另一邊的唯一論點是當前的這一邊很糟糕，他們也會一樣糟糕甚至更糟。
The left has already been in control, and we can all see how that turned out.
左派已經(jīng)掌控過了，我們都可以看到結果如何。
Last night, in the debate, Kamala was laughing when Trump brought that up. And the journalist, moderating the debate, said that the city denied that this was happening. But everyone knows that it does. There is even videos, where they talk about this.
昨晚在辯論中，當特朗普提到這個話題時，卡馬拉在笑。主持辯論的記者說市政府否認發(fā)生了這種情況。但大家都知道這確實發(fā)生了。甚至還有視頻討論這個問題。
@FavoRitsu Don't go out wearing any jewelry..
別戴首飾出門..
that already started 2021.... cash even reported it 2023
這從2021年就開始了......在2023年也報道了這一點
The disappearance of shops is organized. With a digital currency and everything is bought online it gives governments the power to block certain acquisitions as you have reached your limit for that product whether food, alcoho, gas or other items that will have limits. I mean, why else would you allow shoplifters to steal up to $ 1000 without prosecution!
商店的消失是有組織的。使用數(shù)字貨幣和在線購物使政府有權限制某些商品的購買，如食品、酒精、汽油或其他有購買限制的物品。我是說，為什么會允許偷竊者在沒有起訴的情況下偷竊高達1000美元的物品！
Please vote red NYC cant handle this anymore.
請投紅色票，紐約市再也承受不住了。
LOL! Like we have a choice.
哈哈！就像我們有選擇一樣。
NYC beautiful, classy, No more!..
紐約市曾經(jīng)美麗、優(yōu)雅，但不再了！
@myranaam8562 Right....
對....
@loveandgamingxx1744 and crime is down in NYC. Ask our great Mayor.....
紐約市的犯罪率下降了。問問我們偉大的市長.....
@ZeroiusProduction you'll be happy my blue friend.
你會感到開心，我的藍色朋友。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Well they vilified Rudy G yet he was the man who cleaned up the city then Diblasio destroyed it.
他們抨擊了魯?shù)稀ぶ炖材幔攀悄莻€清理城市的人，然后迪布拉西奧毀掉了它。
The largest grocer in the nation is Kroger. Kroger is a publicly-traded company, and so their financials are available. They operate at a 2% profit margin. It would not take much theft to cancel out such a small margin. People think "Wal-Mart has BILLIONS! This small amount won't hurt them!" They are wrong. And they're comparing that theft against the REVENUE not the PROFIT.
全國最大的超市是克羅格?？肆_格是一家上市公司，因此其財務數(shù)據(jù)是公開的。他們的利潤率為2%。要抵消這樣的小利潤率，偷竊的數(shù)量不會很大。人們認為“沃爾瑪有數(shù)十億！這小小的損失不會傷害他們！”他們錯了。他們把偷竊與收入而不是利潤相比。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Bull, it is pure greed on the big companies and the share holders. Greed, greed and more greed.
胡說，這純粹是大公司和股東的貪婪。貪婪、貪婪和更多的貪婪。
@JesusismyRock773 Still not a reason for rampant theft.
這仍然不是泛濫盜竊的理由。
Who'd have thought that telling employees to not interfere with thieves would encourage more theft...
誰能想到告訴員工不要干涉小偷會鼓勵更多的盜竊...
As a great 20th century philosopher once said " YA CAN'T FIX STUPID ! ".
正如一位偉大的20世紀哲學家曾經(jīng)說過的：“你無法修復愚蠢！”
As a great modern times philosopher “ you can but it’s gonna hurt
作為一位現(xiàn)代哲學家說的：“你可以，但會很痛苦”
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Crime is down Gotcha. Numbers look good when no one is getting prosecuted. Keep turning a blind eye NY. Looks like it’s working out for us.
犯罪率下降了，明白了。當沒有人被起訴時，數(shù)據(jù)看起來很好。繼續(xù)對紐約視而不見吧。這似乎對我們有利。
You look like Snow White lol
你看起來像白雪公主，哈哈
lol, please explain more.....
哈哈，請多解釋一下.....
@mllee4016 13% comitting 50%
13%的人犯下了50%的罪行
For real
確實如此
This is what you get when you say BLM.
這就是你說“黑人的命也是命”時得到的結果。
Yup democrat policy
沒錯，是民主黨的政策
I assume you want to say my black folk right but NOPE it's yall immigrants.
我猜你想說的是我的黑人同胞對吧，但不，實際上是你們這些移民。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
oh..."those people" again as always.
哦，又是“那些人”了，像往常一樣。
They did this 100 years ago to privately owned, commercial land. Individuals lost generational property while those in power swooped in and purchased it for pennies on the dollar. 100 years ago we had a competitive, sustainable agriculture sector. Now its owned bya handful of mega corporations.
100年前，他們對私人擁有的商業(yè)土地進行了類似的操作。個人失去了幾代人的財產(chǎn)，而有權者則以極低的價格將其買下。100年前，我們有一個競爭力強、可持續(xù)的農(nóng)業(yè)部門?，F(xiàn)在則被少數(shù)幾個大企業(yè)壟斷了。
Someone needs to send a memo to the landlords that crime LOWERS the value of their property NOT raises them...
有人需要給房東發(fā)個通知，犯罪降低了他們財產(chǎn)的價值，而不是提升它們...
That's the problem they don't want to punish them, so they'll keep doing it. NY will have to learn the hard way until there's some real change.
問題在于，他們不想懲罰這些犯罪分子，所以他們會繼續(xù)這樣做。紐約必須通過艱難的方式學習，直到發(fā)生一些真正的改變。
Thats only in a normal economy not in an economy with no jobs. You can jail as many thieves as you can and more will come because people can't make enough in a job and that's if they found one.
這只適用于正常經(jīng)濟，而不是沒有工作的經(jīng)濟。你可以把盡可能多的小偷送進監(jiān)獄，但更多的小偷會出現(xiàn)，因為人們找不到足夠的工作。
Looting isn't necessarily the problem. It's democratic policies.
搶劫不一定是問題。問題在于民主黨的政策。
It's "racist" to show the cam footage of the perps lol
展示犯罪嫌疑人的監(jiān)控錄像被稱為“種族主義”，哈哈
Didn't ask,
沒問，
Faaaaacinating view. But could you say "Murder isn't necessarily the problem. It's X policies? Im not so sure. Both need to be addressed.
非常有趣的觀點。但你能說“謀殺不一定是問題。問題在于X政策”嗎？我不太確定。兩者都需要解決。
@aurorajones8481 They let them steal up to 1000 dollars without consequence so policy is enabling there actions
他們允許小偷偷竊高達1000美元而不受懲罰，因此政策在縱容他們的行為。
@heathmcrigsby It is and you are.
這確實是，而且你也是。
@louniece1650 Why is it racist? Maybe its because a majority of perps happen to look a certain way, and showing all perps would inadvertently show a 'disproportionate' amount of the aforementioned majority..?
為什么這會是種族主義？也許是因為大多數(shù)犯罪嫌疑人看起來是某種特定的樣子，展示所有犯罪嫌疑人可能會無意中顯示出那個特定群體的“過度”比例？
@louniece1650 is reality racist? Or is just noticing reality racist?
現(xiàn)實本身是種族主義嗎？還是僅僅注意到現(xiàn)實就是種族主義？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
@aurorajones8481 Let's try a hypothetical question and see if you can keep up: If a politician came out and made holding without bail for 2+ murders, and anything under you couldn't place bail higher than 1000 dollars, what do you think would happen to the murder rate? I'm curious to see if you're too cowardly to respond or not.
我們來試一個假設性的問題，看看你是否能跟上：如果有位政治家提出，對于2宗以上的謀殺罪不允許保釋，而對于其他罪行的保釋額不能超過1000美元，你認為謀殺率會發(fā)生什么變化？我很想知道你是否太膽怯而不愿回應。
New York City is slowly being destroyed by shoplifting. There's no going back. SAD. Thank you Cash for all your work to share this news.
紐約市正被偷竊行為慢慢摧毀。已經(jīng)無法回頭了。悲哀。感謝為我們分享這些消息。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Pray in JESUS Name
以耶穌之名禱告
Being destroyed by liberals
被自由派摧毀了
We have to vote these bastards out of office. That’s the answer one way or another.
我們必須把這些混蛋投票罷免。這是唯一的解決辦法。
No reason to even visit with all the vacancies.
有這么多空置房，根本沒有理由去參觀。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Same in California- San Francisco. There are signs telling thieves its ok to steal under $950 worth of Goods.
加利福尼亞州的情況也是如此——舊金山。有標志告訴小偷偷竊價值低于950美元的商品是可以的。
Why aren't New Yorkers SCREAMING on the LAWNS OF YOUR GOVERNOR AND MAYOR'S..... The old saying " this shit starts at the TOP"...
為什么紐約人不在州長和市長的草坪上尖叫？老話說“這一切從上面開始”...
Because they have been brought into submission. They have been brought into line.
因為他們已經(jīng)被迫服從，已被整頓。
NYC is going to be the world's first test case of a city that survives without brick and mortar retail.
紐約市將成為全球第一個沒有實體零售而生存的城市試驗案例。
Oh Chicago is Gothem city, today.....WTF is going on....this is not normal.....I don't vote....because....I live in Chicago
哦，今天的芝加哥就是哥譚市.....究竟發(fā)生了什么....這不正常.....我不投票.....因為....我住在芝加哥
Haven’t you seen what’s become of San Francisco? It’s way ahead of NYC.
你沒看到舊金山變成了什么嗎？它已經(jīng)遠遠領先于紐約市。
You'll NEVER see this on mainstream network news. Keep bringing us the truth Jordan!
你永遠不會在主流網(wǎng)絡新聞中看到這些。繼續(xù)為我們帶來真相吧，喬丹！
Yah, because what Jordan shows and says does not support the woke agenda.
是的，因為喬丹展示和說的內(nèi)容不支持覺醒議程。
@hannakinn I wonder how his real estate business is doing? Eric Von Conover still is making videos showing multi-million dollar apts. and homes in NCY.
我想知道他的房地產(chǎn)生意怎么樣了？埃里克·馮·科諾弗還在制作展示紐約市數(shù)百萬美元公寓和房屋的視頻。
LM, the heck you're talking about? Jordan uses clips from news networks in his videos as evidence of the crime that's happening. Do you even understand what you're watching? LOL
哈哈，你在說什么呢？喬丹在他的視頻中使用新聞網(wǎng)絡的片段作為正在發(fā)生的犯罪的證據(jù)。你甚至明白你在看什么嗎？哈哈
@dumdumgarcia2830 Exactly. People need to stop regurgitating group think and
actually start thinking for themselves.
完全正確。人們需要停止重復集體思維，真正開始獨立思考。
@queeniwearth But it's easier to just follow the crowd.
但跟隨人群更容易。
I grew up in the 80's and 90's. Back then, the neighborhood was safe and clean. Today, it's overrun with crime and filth. I feel like the city has become a different place.
我在80年代和90年代長大。那時候，社區(qū)是安全和干凈的。如今，犯罪和骯臟泛濫。我覺得這座城市已經(jīng)變了樣。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
All over America now, cities are declining, becoming unlivable.
現(xiàn)在整個美國，城市都在衰退，變得難以居住。