唐寧街10號(hào)：英國(guó)預(yù)計(jì)本周將受到唐納德·特朗普關(guān)稅的打擊

UK expecting to be hit by Donald Trump’s tariffs this week – No 10

2025-04-02 jiangye111 4561 5 1 收藏糾錯(cuò)&舉報(bào)

譯文簡(jiǎn)介

“因?yàn)槲覀兊慕?jīng)濟(jì)空間為零，我們甚至無(wú)法在這個(gè)霸凌的游戲中與他對(duì)抗?！?

正文翻譯

UK expecting to be hit by Donald Trump’s tariffs this week – No 10
- The Government has been trying to negotiate an exemption from the taxes on imports into the US which are set to come into force later this week.

唐寧街10號(hào)：英國(guó)預(yù)計(jì)本周將受到唐納德·特朗普關(guān)稅的打擊
——政府一直試圖通過(guò)談判豁免出口到美國(guó)的關(guān)稅，該關(guān)稅將于本周晚些時(shí)候生效。

(Sir Keir Starmer visit to US.)

（斯塔默訪問美國(guó)。）
新聞：

The UK is expecting to be hit by Donald Trump’s tariffs this week, Downing Street has said, as discussions with the US are set to continue beyond Wednesday.

英國(guó)政府表示，預(yù)計(jì)英國(guó)本周將受到唐納德·特朗普關(guān)稅的打擊，與美國(guó)的談判將持續(xù)到周三之后。

The Government has been trying to negotiate an exemption from the taxes on imports into the US which are set to come into force later this week.

政府一直試圖通過(guò)談判豁免出口到美國(guó)的關(guān)稅，該關(guān)稅將于本周晚些時(shí)候生效。

The US president has announced a 25% import tax will be introduced on all cars imported to the US, a measure expected to hit British luxury car makers such as Rolls-Royce and Aston Martin.

美國(guó)總統(tǒng)宣布將對(duì)所有進(jìn)口到美國(guó)的汽車征收25%的進(jìn)口稅，這一措施預(yù)計(jì)將打擊勞斯萊斯和阿斯頓馬丁等英國(guó)豪華汽車制造商。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

The levy is on top of a series of tariffs set to come into effect on April 2, which could include a general 20% tax on UK products in response to the rate of VAT.

該稅是將于4月2日生效的一系列關(guān)稅的基礎(chǔ)上征收的，其中可能包括對(duì)英國(guó)產(chǎn)品征收20%的增值稅。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

Sir Keir Starmer’s official spokesman said on Monday: “When it comes to tariffs the Prime Minister has been clear he will always act in the national interest and we’ve been actively preparing for all eventualities ahead of the expected announcements from President Trump this week, which we would expect the UK to be impacted by alongside other countries.

斯塔默爵士的官方發(fā)言人周一表示：“在關(guān)稅問題上，首相已經(jīng)明確表示，他將始終以國(guó)家利益為基礎(chǔ)行事，在特朗普總統(tǒng)本周預(yù)計(jì)宣布之前，我們一直在積極為所有可能發(fā)生的事情做準(zhǔn)備，我們預(yù)計(jì)英國(guó)將與其他國(guó)家一起受到影響。

“Our trade teams are continuing to have constructive discussions to agree a UK-US economic prosperity deal.

“我們的貿(mào)易團(tuán)隊(duì)正在繼續(xù)進(jìn)行建設(shè)性的討論，以達(dá)成一項(xiàng)英美經(jīng)濟(jì)繁榮協(xié)議。

“But we will only do a deal which reflects this Government’s mandate to deliver economic stability for the British people, and we will only act in the national interest.”

“但我們只會(huì)達(dá)成一項(xiàng)反映政府為英國(guó)人民提供經(jīng)濟(jì)穩(wěn)定的授權(quán)的協(xié)議，我們只會(huì)從國(guó)家利益出發(fā)?！?/b>
0

Asked whether the Government had given up hope of a deal being signed before Wednesday, the spokesman said he is “not going to put a time frx on those discussions” but that they are “l(fā)ikely to continue beyond Wednesday”.

當(dāng)被問及政府是否已經(jīng)放棄了在周三之前簽署協(xié)議的希望時(shí)，這位發(fā)言人表示，他“不會(huì)為這些討論設(shè)定一個(gè)時(shí)間框架”，但他們“可能會(huì)持續(xù)到周三之后”。
0

He said that the UK will “take a calm and pragmatic approach in our response”.

他表示，英國(guó)將“采取冷靜和務(wù)實(shí)的態(tài)度作出回應(yīng)”。
0

Sir Keir and Mr Trump discussed the “productive negotiations” the two nations have had towards an economic deal in a phone call on Sunday.

在周日的電話中，基爾爵士和特朗普討論了兩國(guó)為達(dá)成一項(xiàng)經(jīng)濟(jì)協(xié)議而進(jìn)行的“富有成效的談判”。
0

According to a Downing Street read out of the call, the two leaders agreed that “talks will continue at pace this week”.

根據(jù)唐寧街宣讀的通話內(nèi)容，兩位領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人同意“本周將繼續(xù)談判”。
0

Mr Trump has branded April 2 “Liberation Day” for the US, as he claimed the tariffs he plans to introduce will free the US from foreign goods and boost its domestic economy.

特朗普將4月2日稱為美國(guó)的“解放日”，因?yàn)樗暦Q，他計(jì)劃推出的關(guān)稅將使美國(guó)擺脫外國(guó)商品的影響，并提振國(guó)內(nèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)。
0

The new taxes could make or break the Government’s plans to grow the economy, and they come into force just after Rachel Reeves made a series of cuts at the spring statement in order to restore a narrow buffer in the public spending headroom.

新稅可能會(huì)成就或破壞政府的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)計(jì)劃，而且就在雷切爾·里夫斯在春季聲明中做出一系列削減措施以恢復(fù)公共支出空間的有限緩沖之后，新稅開始生效。
0

Asked whether the Government would be considering another budget in the event of being hit by tariffs, the spokesman said: The UK will “reserve the right” to respond to tariffs “in a way that does protect British industry”, Downing Street has said.

當(dāng)被問及政府是否會(huì)在受到關(guān)稅打擊的情況下考慮另一項(xiàng)預(yù)算時(shí)，這位發(fā)言人表示：英國(guó)將“保留權(quán)利”，以“真正保護(hù)英國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)的方式”回應(yīng)關(guān)稅。
0

Asked whether the Government would be considering another budget if the UK is hit by tariffs from Donald Trump, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “We’ll obviously always take an approach that suits the British economy.

當(dāng)被問及如果英國(guó)受到唐納德·特朗普的關(guān)稅打擊，政府是否會(huì)考慮另一項(xiàng)預(yù)算時(shí)，首相的官方發(fā)言人說(shuō)：“我們顯然會(huì)一直采取適合英國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的方法。
0

“We’ll have a budget in the autumn, and the OBR will obviously upxe the forecast at that point.”

“我們將在秋季出臺(tái)預(yù)算，預(yù)算責(zé)任辦公室屆時(shí)顯然會(huì)更新預(yù)測(cè)。”
0

He also said that the UK will “reserve the right to respond in a way that does protect British industry”.

他還表示，英國(guó)將“保留以保護(hù)英國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)的方式作出回應(yīng)的權(quán)利”。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

0

Liberal Democrats leader Sir Ed Davey said that Number 10 expecting tariffs will be “deeply worrying” to people.

自由民主黨領(lǐng)袖埃德·戴維爵士表示，唐寧街10號(hào)預(yù)期的關(guān)稅將讓人們“深感擔(dān)憂”。
0

Sir Ed said: “Ministers have rightly tried to avoid Donald Trump imposing his destructive tariffs on British businesses – but as we knew all along, Trump doesn’t care.

埃德爵士說(shuō)：“大臣們正確地試圖避免唐納德·特朗普對(duì)英國(guó)企業(yè)征收破壞性關(guān)稅——但我們一直都知道，特朗普不在乎。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

0

“Just asking nicely clearly doesn’t work with Trump, so we have to stand tall with our allies in Canada and Europe and show that we will not be bullied. That means being prepared to impose reciprocal tariffs if necessary, including on Elon Musk’s Teslas, and urgently negotiating a better trade deal with the EU to show Trump we have alternatives.”

“只是友好地請(qǐng)求顯然對(duì)特朗普不起作用，所以我們必須與加拿大和歐洲的盟友站在一起，表明我們不會(huì)被欺負(fù)。”這意味著準(zhǔn)備在必要時(shí)征收互惠關(guān)稅，包括對(duì)埃隆·馬斯克的特斯拉汽車征收關(guān)稅，并緊急與歐盟談判達(dá)成更好的貿(mào)易協(xié)議，向特朗普表明我們有替代方案。”

0

評(píng)論翻譯

PeterG92Essex
Time to start boycotting US products and we should also be introducing retaliatory tarrifs. Remove the subsidies on Tesla for a start

是時(shí)候開始抵制美國(guó)產(chǎn)品了，我們也應(yīng)該引入報(bào)復(fù)性關(guān)稅。首先取消對(duì)特斯拉的補(bǔ)貼

jj198handsy
Well i dont pay for it and there isn’t really a viable alternative so thats a no from me, stopped buying coke, amazon products, cancelled netflix and disney, stopped buying american clothes, i work for them a fair bit though, not giving that up!

好吧，我不付錢，也沒有其他可行的選擇，所以我拒絕了，不再買可樂和亞馬遜的產(chǎn)品，取消了網(wǎng)飛和迪士尼，不再買美國(guó)衣服，盡管我為他們工作了一段時(shí)間，但我沒有放棄！

chronicnerv
The UK needs to sort out its own payment and credit card systems asap. Every single online payment has a tax on it that goes to the Americans. This would be far more damaging than simply boycotting businesses they can shuffle about and cook the books with.

英國(guó)需要盡快理清自己的支付和信用卡系統(tǒng)。每一筆在線支付都要向美國(guó)人征稅。這將比簡(jiǎn)單地抵制那些他們可以隨意洗錢和做假帳的企業(yè)更具破壞性。

Due_Ad_3200
The UK needs to sort out its own payment and credit card systems asap
Yes, but I think this would be better done in partnership with other countries, EU, Canada, Japan, as many as possible, because it will attract a reaction, and there is perhaps more safety in numbers.

“英國(guó)需要盡快理清自己的支付和信用卡系統(tǒng)”
是的，但我認(rèn)為最好與其他國(guó)家合作，與歐盟、加拿大、日本，盡可能多地合作，因?yàn)檫@會(huì)引起反應(yīng)，而且數(shù)量多也許更安全。

Allmotr
You already have tarrifs placed on the US for a long while now.

你們已經(jīng)對(duì)美國(guó)征收關(guān)稅很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間了。

Minimum-Geologist-58
Yes every country in the world has tariffs placed on products from countries it’s not in an FTA with. Trump tariffs are a) far higher across the board, the average tariff is about 3% these are generally 25% b) also placed on products that every other nation on earth follows international agreements like the UN technology agreement to make 0% tariff globally.
It’s not remotely equivalent.

是的，世界上每個(gè)國(guó)家都對(duì)來(lái)自非自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定國(guó)家的產(chǎn)品征收關(guān)稅。特朗普的關(guān)稅：1、全面地高得多，平均關(guān)稅約為3%，這些新增關(guān)稅通常為25%；2、也對(duì)地球上所有其他國(guó)家都遵循聯(lián)合國(guó)技術(shù)協(xié)議等國(guó)際協(xié)議征收0關(guān)稅的產(chǎn)品征收關(guān)稅。
這一點(diǎn)也不對(duì)等。

Allmotr
Thats not true even canada has tariffs on the US for 225%+ on certain things. Why is it fair for other countries to tarrif except for the US?

這不是真的，甚至加拿大都對(duì)美國(guó)的某些商品征收225%以上的關(guān)稅。憑什么其他國(guó)家征收關(guān)稅是公平的，美國(guó)就不行？

Minimum-Geologist-58
It’s entirely true. Yes some things like automobiles, steel and baseball gloves in the USA (genuinely) are very heavily tariffed, a lot of HS codes are zero globally or 1-3%. It averages out at about 3% on total value of imports globally I seem to recall. Tariffs on nearly about 99.9% of Chinese goods in the USA are currently at least 27.5%. On “Independence day” it looks like that will be pretty much the same for a lot of countries. It’s a huge escalation of tariffs.

這完全是真的。是的，像汽車、鋼鐵和棒球手套這樣的東西在美國(guó)（真的）被征收了很高的關(guān)稅，很多編碼商品在全球范圍內(nèi)是零關(guān)稅或1-3%的關(guān)稅。我記得它平均占全球進(jìn)口總值的3%左右。目前，美國(guó)對(duì)近99.9%的中國(guó)商品征收的關(guān)稅至少為27.5%。在“獨(dú)立日”，看起來(lái)很多國(guó)家的情況都差不多。這是關(guān)稅的大幅升級(jí)。

5harp3dges
Brexit was a stupid short sighted idea anyway. Lets cut our loses and get back in, with whatever penalties we deserve. America is not something I think any of us want to rely on in any way, shape or form. Europe as a whole need to band together and strengthen our defenses. I'll say it until I'm blue in the face, legalising and taxing recreational cannabis would generate billions for any country or city smart enough to implement it. This has been shown in every example of people doing it, look at California, Colorada, Netherlands, Thailand, Barcelona. There's no examples of this being a bad thing to happen to a city, and the money can be split between the NHS and military defenses while at the same time generating thousands of jobs and freeing up police time and spending. It's a no brainer. Cannabis culture is huge in the UK more than most would like to admit, and all that money is going to "criminals". Time to get with the times and make smart choices, stop trying to impose more control on a society that is only going to push back against it. We'd love to fight for a country we believe in, start there.

不管怎樣，英國(guó)脫歐是一個(gè)愚蠢的短視想法。讓我們減少損失，重新開始，不管我們應(yīng)該受到什么懲罰。我認(rèn)為我們?nèi)魏稳硕疾幌胍匀魏畏绞健⑷魏涡问揭蕾嚸绹?guó)。歐洲作為一個(gè)整體需要團(tuán)結(jié)起來(lái)，加強(qiáng)我們的防御。我會(huì)一直說(shuō)到我抑郁為止，將娛樂用大麻合法化并對(duì)其征稅將為任何明智的國(guó)家或城市帶來(lái)數(shù)十億美元的收入。這在人們做的每一個(gè)例子中都有體現(xiàn)，看看加利福尼亞、科羅拉多、荷蘭、泰國(guó)、巴塞羅那。沒有任何例子表明這對(duì)一個(gè)城市來(lái)說(shuō)是一件壞事，這筆錢可以在國(guó)家醫(yī)療體系和軍事防御之間分配，同時(shí)創(chuàng)造數(shù)千個(gè)就業(yè)崗位，節(jié)省警察的時(shí)間和開支。這是毋庸置疑的。大麻文化在英國(guó)的影響力比大多數(shù)人愿意承認(rèn)的要大得多，而所有這些錢都流向了“罪犯”。是時(shí)候跟上時(shí)代，做出明智的選擇，不要再試圖對(duì)一個(gè)只會(huì)反其道而行的社會(huì)施加更多的控制。我們?cè)敢鉃槲覀兯叛龅膰?guó)家而戰(zhàn)，讓我們開始這里吧。

Cute_Ad_9730
Trumps proposals are the biggest threat to world peace in the last 60 years. Greenland, Panama, Mexico, Canada and multiple other ridiculous plans. EU and the UN need to make it clear that this is not acceptable. Russian aggression is not going to be tolerated and US is in no position to mandate or negotiate a solution. US you do not govern the world.

特朗普的提議是過(guò)去60年來(lái)對(duì)世界和平的最大威脅。格陵蘭島、巴拿馬、墨西哥、加拿大和其他許多荒謬的計(jì)劃。歐盟和聯(lián)合國(guó)必須明確表示，這是不可接受的。俄羅斯的侵略是不會(huì)被容忍的，美國(guó)也沒有資格授權(quán)或談判一個(gè)解決方案。美國(guó)，你不能統(tǒng)治世界。

DavidSwiftyGreater Manchester
And because we have zero econimic legroom, we can't even battle this bully at his own game. Anyway all the more reason to get closer to Europe and the EU.

因?yàn)槲覀兊慕?jīng)濟(jì)空間為零，我們甚至無(wú)法在這個(gè)霸凌的游戲中與他對(duì)抗。不管怎樣，更有理由與歐洲和歐盟走得更近。

Exige_ 10
We are still one of the largest economies in the world. There will certain sectors that can be targeted by means a proportional response.
Your statement is factually incorrect.

我們?nèi)匀皇鞘澜缟献畲蟮慕?jīng)濟(jì)體之一。有些行業(yè)可以選作目標(biāo)，進(jìn)行適當(dāng)?shù)幕貞?yīng)。
你的陳述實(shí)際上是不正確的。

Dry_Pie6127
We are, but the US is an of magnitude larger. ￡2.85tn vs $29tn.
We’re large, but the gaps between countries at the top is massive.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/268173/countries-with-the-largest-gross-domestic-product-gdp/
The EU by comparison is about the same size as the US in PPP terms.

我們是，但美國(guó)的規(guī)模要大得多。2.85萬(wàn)億英鎊 VS 29萬(wàn)億美元。
我們是大，但頂端國(guó)家之間的差距巨大。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

https://www.statista.com/statistics/268173/countries-with-the-largest-gross-domestic-product-gdp/

相比之下，按購(gòu)買力平價(jià)計(jì)算，歐盟的規(guī)模與美國(guó)大致相當(dāng)。

UpgradedSiera6666
Indeed there are only 3 economic superpower in this world currently.
The United States
The European unx
China
All others Countries are mid sized economies or small economies.
Also many Countries want to actually join The EU.
Countries in South America wants to further their economic ties.

事實(shí)上，目前世界上只有三個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)超級(jí)大國(guó)。
1.美國(guó)
2.歐盟
3.中國(guó)
所有其他國(guó)家都是中型或小型經(jīng)濟(jì)體。
還有很多國(guó)家想要加入歐盟。
南美國(guó)家希望進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)它們之間的經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系。

FIREATWlLL
We buy loads of US shit. Have you seen how many Ford’s are on our roads. We can battle to an extent, and cumulatively with other nations this will make a real big difference.

我們買了很多美國(guó)貨。你看到我們的路上有多少輛福特了嗎？我們可以在一定程度上，并與其他國(guó)家積累作戰(zhàn)，這將產(chǎn)生巨大的影響。

Azalzaal
why does the UK have a 10% tariff on US cars if tariffs are so bad?
I’m not boycotting anything I think boycotts are stupid I’m going to buy whatever is cheap and avoid anything that isn’t don’t care where it comes from

既然關(guān)稅這么糟糕，為什么英國(guó)還要對(duì)美國(guó)汽車征收10%的關(guān)稅呢？
我不抵制任何東西，我認(rèn)為抵制是愚蠢的，我要買任何便宜的東西，避免任何不便宜的東西，不在乎它來(lái)自哪里

HoggleSnarf
Most tariffs are reciprocal and are agreed in trade deals to protect domestic production. Here's a good example of a tariff that worked.
The US' dairy industry is designed in a way that means the final product in supermarkets is cheap, so the population can buy it freely, and farmers are subsidised by the government to make their money. In Canada, it's the inverse, and dairy farms aren't subsided, so dairy products are more expensive in the supermarkets. If Canada didn't have tariffs on American dairy, then US manufacturers would be able to undercut the market, and a huge source of industry in Canada would fail and require bailouts. Dairy imported to Canada from the US is tariffed to bring prices in line with the typical market.
Likewise for why we impose tariffs on US imported cars. Our manufacturing capabilities don't match the US, so we impose tariffs on these products so companies like Jaguar Land Rover don't go bump. BYD cars from China are tariffed to the eyeballs so billions of pounds of R&D from UK car manufacturers isn't completely wasted.
Tariffs on their own aren't necessarily a terrible thing. Trump's tariffs are because he doesn't seem to understand how they work or why they exist. He's going to cause a global recession placing tariffs on countries he takes personal issue with.

大多數(shù)關(guān)稅都是互惠的，是在貿(mào)易協(xié)議中達(dá)成的，以保護(hù)國(guó)內(nèi)生產(chǎn)。這里有一個(gè)很好的例子，說(shuō)明關(guān)稅是有效的。
美國(guó)乳制品行業(yè)的設(shè)計(jì)方式意味著，超市里的最終產(chǎn)品很便宜，因此人們可以自由購(gòu)買，而農(nóng)民則得到政府的補(bǔ)貼來(lái)賺錢。在加拿大，情況正好相反，奶牛場(chǎng)并沒有補(bǔ)貼，所以超市里的乳制品更貴。如果加拿大沒有對(duì)美國(guó)乳制品征收關(guān)稅，那么美國(guó)制造商將能夠削弱市場(chǎng)，加拿大的一個(gè)巨大產(chǎn)業(yè)來(lái)源將失敗并需要救助。所以加拿大對(duì)從美國(guó)進(jìn)口的奶制品征收關(guān)稅，以使價(jià)格與典型的市場(chǎng)價(jià)格保持一致。
同樣，為什么我們對(duì)美國(guó)進(jìn)口汽車征收關(guān)稅。因?yàn)槲覀兊闹圃炷芰Ρ炔簧厦绹?guó)，所以我們對(duì)這些產(chǎn)品征收關(guān)稅，這樣捷豹路虎這樣的公司就不會(huì)受到?jīng)_擊。來(lái)自中國(guó)的比亞迪汽車被征收高額關(guān)稅，因此英國(guó)汽車制造商數(shù)十億英鎊的研發(fā)資金不會(huì)完全浪費(fèi)。
關(guān)稅本身不一定是一件可怕的事情。特朗普的關(guān)稅是因?yàn)樗坪醪幻靼姿鼈兪侨绾芜\(yùn)作的，也不明白它們?yōu)槭裁创嬖?。他要?duì)他個(gè)人有意見的國(guó)家征收關(guān)稅，造成全球經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退。

Moglet91
So he wants us to pay our share for NATO, but also wants us to suffer economically making that harder?

所以他想讓我們?yōu)楸奔s支付我們的份額，但又想讓我們?cè)诮?jīng)濟(jì)上受苦，讓這更加困難？

LookOverall
Obviously he’d be happy is social services and the NHS collapsed.
But I’d rather we took economic damage than see our government kiss the ring

顯然，他會(huì)為社會(huì)服務(wù)和國(guó)家醫(yī)療體系崩潰而高興。
但我寧愿我們?cè)馐芙?jīng)濟(jì)損失，也不愿看到我們的政府拍馬屁

Livelih00d
Trump's plan to tariff everyone are literally just going to hurt Americans more than anyone else.

特朗普對(duì)所有人征收關(guān)稅的計(jì)劃實(shí)際上只會(huì)對(duì)美國(guó)人造成比其他人更大的傷害。

notarobat
Yeah they are gonna be suffering from all that extra cash. They are a sensible way of bringing more money to the US no matter what Reddit tells you. Could they go badly for America? Yes, but it's incredibly unlikely

是的，他們會(huì)因?yàn)檫@些額外的錢而受苦，是吧。不管紅迪上怎么說(shuō)，這都是給美國(guó)帶來(lái)更多錢的明智方式。他們會(huì)對(duì)美國(guó)不利嗎？是的，但可能性非常小
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處

ionetic
Americans pay the tariffs, so there’s no ‘extra cash’.

美國(guó)人自己支付關(guān)稅，所以不存在什么“額外的錢”。

notarobat
That's short term. The purpose of the tariffs is to bring business to the US. And it's gonna work no matter what you read online

這是短期情況。征收關(guān)稅的目的是為美國(guó)帶來(lái)商業(yè)。不管你在網(wǎng)上看到什么，關(guān)稅政策都會(huì)起效果的

Livelih00d
what looney toons world do you live in where antagonising your trade partners will make them more likely to do business with you?

你生活在一個(gè)多么瘋狂的世界里，與你的貿(mào)易伙伴對(duì)抗會(huì)讓他們更有可能與你做生意嗎？

ionetic
The only thing brought to the US is going to be higher prices.

唯一會(huì)給美國(guó)帶來(lái)的就是更高的價(jià)格。

唐寧街10號(hào) 英國(guó) 特朗普 關(guān)稅

很贊 ( 1 )

收藏