記者采訪：南達科他州的這個地區(qū)大約有70%的人投票支持特朗普。現(xiàn)在他們怎么想？
This area of South Dakota voted for Trump by roughly 70%. Here's what they think now
譯文簡介
網(wǎng)友：“除非影響到他們自己，否則沒人關心?！?這才是特朗普選民的真實心態(tài)。
正文翻譯
視頻要是看不了，可以根據(jù)這個標題去b站觀看。
評論翻譯
很贊 ( 6 )
收藏
"Nobody cares anymore until it affects them ." That is the true Trump voters' mentality.
“除非影響到他們自己，否則沒人關心?！?這才是特朗普選民的真實心態(tài)。
And they would STILL vote for him if we had a re-do.
如果重新選舉，他們仍然會投票給他。
This is all conservatives
所有保守派都是這樣。
Best part is when she says that then follows it up by saying, "They're not selfish people."
最搞笑的是，她說完“沒人關心”，緊接著又說“他們不是自私的人”。
And then she says they're not selfish. Lady that's the definition.
然后她說他們不自私。女士，這正是自私的定義。
@tfoxsail yes, that was her denial showing.
是的，那是她否認的表現(xiàn)。
"I love the poorly educated." - Comrade Felon Trump
“What luck, for governments, that the people are stupid!” — Adolph H
“我喜歡受教育程度低的人?！?- 重罪犯特朗普同志。
“人民愚蠢，對政府來說真是幸運！” ——阿道夫·希特勒。
" They are not dumb. " These people are not dumb." Ok, tell me why these so call smart people keep voting that way?
“他們不傻?！?“這些人不傻。” 好吧，告訴我為什么這些所謂的聰明人一直這樣投票？
I do really love the insights and communications this reporter investigating in Eastern South Dakota bought to my viewing. Excellent insightful educational reporting. Thank you!
我真的很喜歡這位記者在南達科他州東部調查帶來的見解和交流。非常深刻的教育性報道。謝謝！
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
@jamesedwards5596 She's just being nice. She knows as well as we do that is exactly what these people are.
她只是客氣一下。她和我們一樣清楚，這些人就是那樣。
Exactly! As long as his plans were going to hurt others, they were fine!
沒錯！只要他的計劃傷害的是別人，他們就沒問題！
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
? @Subby808
Exactly!
沒錯！
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Exactly this. My wife is a nurse manager, and we used to live in a very conservative area. After Trump was elected the first time, he cut a number of medical programs. Other nurses would come to her asking if there was any way to help certain patients, and she’d have to tell them, “We can’t anymore, that program was cut.” They’d be shocked and upset, but they were the ones who voted for it. People don’t seem to care until it affects them directly or they’re forced to witness the suffering up close.
正是如此。我的妻子是一名護士主管，我們以前住在一個非常保守的地區(qū)。特朗普第一次當選后，他削減了一些醫(yī)療項目。其他護士會來問她是否有辦法幫助某些病人，她不得不告訴他們，“我們不能了，那個項目被削減了。” 他們會感到震驚和沮喪，但他們正是投票支持他的人。人們似乎只有在直接影響到他們，或者他們被迫近距離目睹痛苦時才會關心。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
"Leopard ate my face." - No Shame Cult 47
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.” - JD Vance (op-ed for The New York Times)
“豹子吃了我的臉?！?——無恥的47號邪教。
“特朗普先生不適合我們國家的最高職位?！?——JD·萬斯（《紐約時報》專欄文章）。
But they’re sheep… they’re going to follow him off the edge… they even said so
但他們是綿羊……他們會跟著他走到懸崖邊……他們自己都這么說。
@TortillaIsExtra That's what pisses me off the most.
這才是最讓我生氣的地方。
@jamesedwards5596 Lack of character.
缺乏品格。
@thesaw9988 just say you’re American and you vote Red it’s fine lol. It’s funny that you think Dems are bad and not this crazy stuff Trump is doing lol
直接說你是美國人，投紅黨就行了，沒關系，哈哈。你覺得民主黨不好，而不是特朗普做的這些瘋狂的事情，真是搞笑。
Exactly
沒錯。
Your right I didn't really care until my 8 year old came home and told me her teacher Mr. * is now wearing a dress and a wig
你說得對，我以前真的不在乎，直到我8歲的孩子回家告訴我，她的老師*先生現(xiàn)在穿著裙子，戴著假發(fā)。
? @TortillaIsExtra Exactly
沒錯。
?Exactly.
沒錯。
Even then I doubt some of them are just not going to get it.
即便如此，我懷疑有些人還是不會明白。
Straight up selfishness.
徹頭徹尾的自私。
And even if it does, they don't care, it's bizarre. Voting against their own interest.
即使影響到他們，他們也不在乎，這很奇怪。投票反對自己的利益。
100% TRUE........UNTIL IT AFFECTS THEM.
百分之百正確……直到影響到他們自己。
Unfortunately, that’s everybody in America not just Republicans. Everybody thinks this way. It’s hyper individualism.
不幸的是，美國每個人都這樣，不僅僅是共和黨人。每個人都這么想，這是極端個人主義。
All BS
全是胡說八道。
? @michaelwelch9123 I think trying to convince yourself
我想你是在試圖說服自己。
He told them he only needed them to vote this one time, and they will not need to vote again, he would “fix” it and he meant it. He is trying to move us towards an autocracy so no need to vote as they will “fix” the vote.
他告訴他們只需要投票這一次，以后就不需要再投票了，他會“解決”這個問題，他是認真的。他正試圖將我們引向DC統(tǒng)治，所以不需要投票，因為他們會“解決”投票問題。
I still believe that most American people are kind and generous. Don't feel ashamed if you made a mistake for voting for Trump, but please don't make the same mistake again! Not just for us, we need to appreciate the values of the democracy and freedom and protect them for our next generation!
我仍然相信大多數(shù)美國人民是善良和慷慨的。如果你們投票給特朗普犯了錯誤，不要感到羞愧，但請不要再犯同樣的錯誤！不僅僅是為了我們，我們需要珍惜民主和自由的價值觀，并為我們的下一代保護它們！
They might not be dumb but their critical thinking skill is severely lacking. We need to always ask the questions if it can happen to them what is stop it from happening to me?
他們可能不笨，但他們的批判性思維能力嚴重不足。我們總是需要問，如果這種事會發(fā)生在他們身上，什么能阻止它發(fā)生在我身上？
it's a hell of a view from your high horse on your moral high ground. I can see why y'all look down on us so much
你站在道德制高點上指手畫腳，真是高人一等。我明白你們?yōu)槭裁茨敲纯床黄鹞覀儭?/b>
Well said
說得好。
and even then, they double down and say it will be for the better...
即便如此，他們還會變本加厲地說情況會變得更好……
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
The economy has been declining for 40 years because of Democrat policies. It's affecting us all.
由于民主黨的政策，經(jīng)濟已經(jīng)衰退了40年。這影響著我們所有人。
@mattreynolds7613 so what? Is the teacher still a good person? Still a good teacher? How they look or what they wear is irrelevant.
那又怎樣？這位老師仍然是個好人嗎？仍然是個好老師嗎？他們的外表或穿著無關緊要。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
And when it DOES Affect them OH MY GOD IS IT AN EMERGENCY THEN. THEIR JAWS ON THE FLOOR EVERY TIME.
當事情真的影響到他們時，我的天哪，那時就變成緊急事件了。他們每次都大吃一驚。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Exactly! My Trumper sibling actually said to me "I shouldn't be forced to care"
沒錯！我支持特朗普的兄弟姐妹竟然對我說“我不應該被迫關心”。
That is a stupid take.
這是個愚蠢的看法。
? @petertadams55 conservative here, didn’t vote for Trump. I voted for Harris
我是保守派，但沒投票給特朗普。我投給了哈里斯。
@ I love sarcasm.
我喜歡諷刺。
That’s not just how Trump voters think. Thats how Republicans in general think. This is the core difference between people who lean toward the political left or the right: empathy. If you have it, you lean left. If you don’t, you lean right.
這不僅僅是特朗普選民的想法。這是共和黨人的普遍想法。這是傾向于政治左派或右派的人之間的核心區(qū)別：同理心。如果你有同理心，你就會傾向于左派。如果你沒有，你就會傾向于右派。
Lies
謊言。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
? @TortillaIsExtra I would. ? trump
我會的。我愛特朗普。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
? @Subby808 why do you love Com...ism?
你為什么喜歡GCZY？
"Personal responsibility" can be code for social Darwinism. They believe if someone is "fit enough" they'll figure out how to make the money and survive. If they can't? That's their problem, because they weren't tough enough, or they were too lazy, or too incompetent, or something else sinful. The idea never died. They believe that the suffering is either deserved or just not their problem.
“個人責任”可能是社會達爾文主義的代名詞。他們認為，如果一個人“足夠優(yōu)秀”，他們就會找到賺錢和生存的方法。如果他們不能？那是他們自己的問題，因為他們不夠堅強，或者太懶惰，或者太無能，或者犯了其他罪過。這種想法從未消失。他們認為，苦難要么是應得的，要么根本就不是他們的問題。
@cooneygir
I almost fell out of my chair when that guy said we're a "gracious" nation. LOL. A gracious nation provides healthcare to their citizens.
當那個人說我們是一個“仁慈”的國家時，我差點從椅子上摔下來。哈哈。但一個仁慈的國家會為其公民提供醫(yī)療保健。
It is not a right my comrade friend!
我的同志朋友，這不是一項權利！
? @ralphmaglio4572 No. It's a goal. There are no true rights, but societies have goals.
不，這是一個目標。沒有真正的權利，但社會有目標。
more tariffs on pharmaceuticals -- does that count?
對藥品征收更多關稅——這算嗎？
'We need something in return'
You literally get money. They pay you for your product. Wth else do you want.
Honestly how the dots don't connect is so crazy to me.
“我們需要一些回報?！?br /> 你們明明收到了錢。他們?yōu)槟銈兊漠a(chǎn)品付款。你們還想要什么？
老實說，我無法理解他們怎么會把這些點聯(lián)系不起來。
Naaah, too many fat unhealthy Americans, if Healthcare was free or affordable we'd be in a huge fat deficit.
不，美國肥胖不健康的人太多了，如果醫(yī)療保健是免費或負擔得起的，我們就會出現(xiàn)巨大的肥胖赤字。
@ralphmaglio4572 Ivan this is still America and we got OBAMA CARE which is better than nothing what does Russia offer a vacation in Ukraine?
伊萬，這里仍然是美國，我們有奧巴馬醫(yī)改，總比沒有強。俄羅斯提供了什么？去烏克蘭度假嗎？
LOL.... when nobody thinks you are gracious except you, then what does that mean?
I know some very gracious Americans but as a group... I have to think long and hard to come up with a nation that is less gracious. First one that comes to mind is Russia. Below is my subjective ranking from most gracious to least gracious:
France: Marianne
Japan: Yamato-hime
China: Chinese dragon
Brittain: John Bull; officially Lady Brittania
USA: Uncle Sam
Russia: Bear; officially mother Russia
哈哈……當除了你自己，沒人認為你仁慈時，這意味著什么？
我認識一些非常仁慈的美國人，但作為一個群體……我必須絞盡腦汁才能想出一個不太仁慈的國家。我首先想到的是俄羅斯。以下是我從最仁慈到最不仁慈的個人排名：
法國：瑪麗安
日本：倭姬
中國：中國龍
英國：約翰·布爾；官方為不列顛尼亞女士
美國：山姆大叔
俄羅斯：熊；官方為俄羅斯母親
The richest neighbor on the block claims so much victimhood that he can't even help in an emergency. The first thing our selfish and conceited nation slashed was USAID.
這條街上最富有的鄰居聲稱自己是受害者，以至于連緊急情況下都無法提供幫助。我們這個自私自負的國家第一個削減的就是美國國際開發(fā)署的預算。
I am an immigrant and this country has been very gracious to me. I guess it’s an issue of perspective.
我是一個移民，這個國家對我非常仁慈。我想這是個視角問題。
? @ralphmaglio4572 it is. It’s in article 25 of the UN declaration of Human rights.
是的，它在《聯(lián)合國人權宣言》第25條中。
? @ralphmaglio4572 Maybe, but it’s our responsibility! Ever wonder why the US keeps dropping down the WHO happiness scale? Because we’re selfish and don’t take responsibility for our society.
也許是，但這是我們的責任！有沒有想過為什么美國在世界衛(wèi)生組織幸福指數(shù)排行榜上不斷下降？因為我們自私，不為我們的社會承擔責任。
? @ralphmaglio4572 A country as prosperous as the US should provide more healthcare. In this day and age, it is a right and for it not to be is inexcusable.
像美國這樣富裕的國家應該提供更多的醫(yī)療保健。在當今時代，這是一項權利，不提供是不可原諒的。
? @grannyweatherwaxe It was, once.
曾經(jīng)是。
Entitled not gracious
理所當然，而非仁慈。
? @ralphmaglio4572 Sure would make us great though wouldn't it? Like so many other countries not as wealthy as US>
那樣做肯定會讓我們變得更偉大，不是嗎？就像許多不如美國富裕的國家一樣。
And a gracious nation also cares about other nations. We are and we contribute monthly to Doctors Without Borders, an organization that brings healthcare to developing countries and war zones. We have never met any of the individuals we have assisted, and never will. We do it because it is the kind thing to do. I love my country, but that doesn’t mean I cannot care about the world at large.
一個仁慈的國家也會關心其他國家。我們是加拿大人，每月都向無國界醫(yī)生組織捐款，該組織為發(fā)展中國家和戰(zhàn)區(qū)提供醫(yī)療保健。我們從未親眼見過我們幫助過的任何個人，也永遠不會。我們這樣做是因為這是善良之舉。我愛我的國家，但這并不意味著我不能關心整個世界。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Hahaha, yes, we are gracious, what a crock that is especially now. Anyway meanwhile more of the same as we play the new game of "Let's wreck the nation" . The only contestants allowed to play are incompetent ones.
哈哈，是的，我們很仁慈，尤其現(xiàn)在看來真是胡說八道。無論如何，與此同時，我們玩著“讓我們摧毀國家”的新游戲，情況依然如此。唯一允許參賽的都是些無能之輩。
Also, the USA doesn't export its food for free.
而且，美國并不免費出口其食品。
Hasn't affected his bottom line as yet but you wait.
目前尚未影響到他的底線，但等著瞧。
Not with Trump in office. He doesn't have a single gracious bone in his body.
特朗普在任期間不是這樣。他身上沒有一絲仁慈的品格。
You mean like Canada?
你的意思是像加拿大那樣嗎？
? @ralphmaglio4572 It is in the civilized world.
在文明世界里是這樣的。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
? @ralphmaglio4572 It is in practically every other western industrialized country.
在幾乎所有其他西方工業(yè)化國家都是如此。
NO where near a gracious nation
遠非一個仁慈的國家。
A gracious nation would have never even nominated a candidate like Trump to run for office, let alone elect him.
一個仁慈的國家甚至不會提名像特朗普這樣的候選人競選公職，更不用說選舉他了。
? @cooneygir lmfao you just proved how ignorant you really are. No country gives free health care.
笑死我了，你恰恰證明了你有多么無知。沒有哪個國家提供免費醫(yī)療保健。
He’s also waiting for hunger and suffer to other countries so that the US farmer can finally make a fortune. How gracious
他還等著其他國家出現(xiàn)饑餓和苦難，這樣美國農民才能最終發(fā)大財。多么“仁慈”啊。
?@katy1282 I'm doing very much alright in my country. But that's not important. How does it treat all the people? That matters. That is my perspective.
我在我的國家過得很好。但這并不重要。重要的是它如何對待所有的人。這是我的看法。
It blows my mind that people are dying and don't have health insurance yet keep voting Republican???
人們在死亡，卻沒有醫(yī)療保險，卻仍然投票給共和黨，這讓我難以置信。
I live in NJ and lost my job, and the government helped me get insurance.
我住在新澤西州，失業(yè)了，政府幫助我獲得了保險。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
? @ralphmaglio4572 Wanting healthcare is not com...st. Is Denmark com...st?
想要醫(yī)療保健不是GCZY。丹麥是GCZY國家嗎？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
@ZeLuluBear
This is the product of poor education and a celebration of being ignorant.
這是教育不足和崇尚無知的產(chǎn)物。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Also, fear and hatred.
還有恐懼和仇恨。
No, that's America.
不，這就是美國。
Agreed
同意。
Not to mention poor judgement.
更不用說判斷力差了。
So YOU are not bright enough to realize that they were talking about the price of food going down….?
所以你不夠聰明，沒意識到他們說的是食品價格下降……？
The cattle rancher talking about giving Trump "latitude"....
... The reporter should've replied, "Trump has already lost $6 TRILLION DOLLARS with his tariffs and you want him to continue with his course of action?"
那個談論給特朗普“余地”的養(yǎng)牛場主……
……記者應該回答，“特朗普的關稅已經(jīng)損失了6萬億美元，你還想讓他繼續(xù)他的做法？”
Yep, that’s why Trump gutted the Department of Education.
是的，這就是特朗普削減教育部預算的原因。
What's even crazier is it already happened the first time he was in office. They knew what they were getting.
更瘋狂的是，他第一次執(zhí)政時就已經(jīng)發(fā)生過這種情況了。他們知道他們會得到什么。
Don't blame me. I voted for Trump
別怪我。我投票給了特朗普。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
YES
是的。
Stupid people elect stupid people
愚蠢的人選出愚蠢的人。
No bailouts for farmers like last time. There has to be consequences!
不要像上次那樣救助農民。必須有后果！
We knew Trump from 2016
我們從2016年就了解特朗普了。
Facts
事實。
Kindergardner knows what a woman is/ Harvad graduate dont.
幼兒園的孩子都知道什么是女人，哈佛畢業(yè)生卻不知道。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
I don't feel any pity for them.
我對他們沒有任何同情。
And racist
還有種族主義者。
"I love the poorly educated", guess who in 2016?
“我喜歡受教育程度低的人”，猜猜在2016年是誰說的？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
F,nal solution
最終解決方案。
Emphasis on poor education.
強調教育不足。
Exactly
沒錯。
? @ZimM804 the price of food is going up.
食品價格正在上漲。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
A lot of racism as well
還有很多種族主義。
? @Trumpisadisaster This video was about the price of Beef going down and an increase in Domestic Produce supply with unchanged demand because of Tariffs Thats literally the price going down
這個視頻是關于牛肉價格下降，以及由于關稅導致國內農產(chǎn)品供應增加而需求不變。這實際上就是價格下降。
? @slowgaffle Yep - It has absolutely nothing to do with education. Whether you didn't graduate from high school or you have a masters degree you just need common sense to take in information then make a logical descision on most things in life. If someone has shown you many times openly that they are a con man then they are a con man.
是的——這與教育絕對無關。無論你是否高中畢業(yè)，或者你擁有碩士學位，你只需要常識來獲取信息，然后在生活中的大多數(shù)事情上做出合理的決定。如果有人多次公開向你表明他們是騙子，那么他們就是騙子。
@MichaelGorman-l7y
he crushed the farmers during his first term, so they voted for him again when his platform was massive tariffs! now they are surprised that they are getting crushed again! go figure!
他在第一任期內壓垮了農民，所以當他的競選綱領是巨額關稅時，他們再次投票給他！現(xiàn)在他們驚訝地發(fā)現(xiàn)自己再次被壓垮！真是不可思議！
When it concerns themselves is the only time they believe in socialism. Cold, hard capitalism for the masses.
只有當涉及到他們自己時，他們才相信社會主義。對大眾來說，是冷酷無情的資本主義。
But don't call them dumb
但不要說他們愚蠢。
The farmers also received a government (taxpayer) bail out during his first term after they took a hit from tariffs. I think they are assuming they will get another one.
農民在他的第一任期內，在遭受關稅打擊后，還獲得了政府（納稅人）的救助。我認為他們認為他們會再次獲得救助。
So other countries are okay to have tariffs on us but we can't on them. Other countries restrict and tariff our farmers and he never crushed farmers last time fool.
所以其他國家可以對我們征收關稅，我們就不能對他們征收。其他國家限制并對我們的農民征收關稅，而且他上次根本沒有壓垮農民，傻瓜。
? @ChrisHenson-z6u so you be ok bailing out the farmers like he had to do the first term, correct? Billions..
那么你愿意像他在第一任期內那樣救助農民，對嗎？數(shù)十億……
? @ChrisHenson-z6u Do you think gas stations should charge for Gas by the amount a consumer uses each month ?
That is basically how he figured tariffs.
The gas station will now charge the people that drive less more for gas and the people that buy more gas will pay less.
Except Russia of course- they can do what ever they want
你認為加油站應該按消費者每月使用的汽油量收費嗎？
這基本上就是他計算關稅的方式。
加油站現(xiàn)在會對開車少的人收取更高的汽油費，而購買更多汽油的人則支付更少的費用。
當然，俄羅斯除外——他們可以為所欲為。
? @plutotech $28 billion to be exact. Guess they like socialism after all.
確切地說是280億美元?？磥硭麄冞€是喜歡社會主義的。
? @ChrisHenson-z6u A $60 Billion bail out last term. What planet are you on?
上個任期救助了600億美元。你來自哪個星球？
? @Ken64190 Yea ummm that was $60 Billion. Your a few billion short. And yes,100's of farmers went bankrupt.
是的，那是600億美元。你少了太多。是的，數(shù)百名農民破產(chǎn)了。
Isn't that the definition of stupidity - do the same thing and expect a different outcome?
這不是愚蠢的定義嗎——做同樣的事情，卻期待不同的結果？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
Bailing out Republican farmers is a sound investment. Forgiving student loans....sorry, pay your debt.
救助共和黨農民是一項穩(wěn)健的投資。免除學生貸款……對不起，還債吧。
? @offgridselfteliant Is that screwing them over? No Trump trying to help farmers not get screwed over by other countries
那是坑他們嗎？不，特朗普試圖幫助農民不被其他國家坑。
? @ChrisHenson-z6u YOU HAD TARIFFS ON OTHER COUNTRIES TOO. The heck. YOU HAVE INTERNET. USE IT.
你們也對其他國家征收了關稅。你們有互聯(lián)網(wǎng)，用它查查。
when you are raised with abusers in the home,
in social isolation wth no sane person around to show you a different way to respond,
the hardwired reaction to abuse becomes: to enable it, to cheer for it and to silence the victims..
that's your far right, in ANY country..
our failure to save the victims of domestic violence became the trumper scurge we see today.
當你在虐待者的家庭中長大，
在社會孤立中，周圍沒有理智的人來告訴你不同的應對方式，
對虐待的根深蒂固的反應就變成了：支持它，為它歡呼，并讓受害者保持沉默……
這就是任何國家的極右翼……
我們未能拯救家庭暴力的受害者，導致了我們今天看到的特朗普主義禍害。
Yes, stupidity is doing the same thing over again when it didn't work the first time.
是的，愚蠢就是重復做第一次行不通的事情。
They voted with their hate and xenophobia, not reason and logic.
他們憑著仇恨和仇外心理投票，而不是理性和邏輯。
@sledzeppelin
Yes, they are stupid.
Yes, they are unkind.
Yes, they are selfish.
Yes, they are thoughtless.
I know these people. I used to love these people. Then the masks came off.
是的，他們很愚蠢。
是的，他們不友善。
是的，他們很自私。
是的，他們很輕率。
我了解這些人。我曾經(jīng)愛這些人。然后，他們的面具被摘掉了。
Truth. Conservatives who vote based on fiscal policy do not exist in this era of polical extremes.
真相。在這個政治極端化的時代，基于財政政策投票的保守派并不存在。
Technically, they refused to wear the masks, but valid points nonetheless.
嚴格來說，他們拒絕戴面具，但這些觀點仍然有效。
Congratulations you just described both sides of the aisle. If you think all those things just apply to Republicans . Then maybe those things all apply to you. Getting sick of people stereotyping certain groups. And not seeing the hypocrisy in their own group.
恭喜，你剛剛描述了兩黨。如果你認為所有這些事情只適用于共和黨人。那么也許所有這些事情都適用于你。我厭倦了人們對某些群體進行刻板印象，卻看不到自己群體的偽善。
Desperate and stupid are not the same thing, they were ostracised and told their concerns were wrong and so turned to a man who appeared to address them, it didn't matter he was a liar or that his solutions were terrible and only likely to bring more hardship on them, he was the only one even talking about them.
當本屆任期結束時，共和黨很可能會遭受重創(chuàng)，但除非我們都想在八年后再次看到某個煽動者利用同樣的恐懼，否則我們需要停止給他們貼標簽，停止在社交上孤立他們，讓他們變得更加極端，我們需要開始尋找共同點。沒有人會因為被罵成卑鄙自私的白癡而改變觀點（無論這有多么真實）。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
? @Tom-b1i3o you’re caught in a cognitive error of thinking the average or middle must be best. But half way between good and evil isn’t better than all the way good.
你陷入了一種認知錯誤，認為平均或中間一定是最好的。但介于善惡之間并不比完全的善更好。
That type of mentality and entitledment got him elected,,, f... Sake is going to help them again in 2028 if we keep this superior mindset..
這種心態(tài)和權利意識讓他當選……如果我們繼續(xù)保持這種優(yōu)越感，2028年他們會再次得逞。
You used to love these people, Really?!!
你曾經(jīng)愛這些人，真的嗎？
? @M_SC nobody's completely good and nobody's completely evil so what are you getting at. You just made my point.
沒有人是完全的善，也沒有人是完全的惡，你想說什么？你只是證實了我的觀點。
@M_SC your equating political spectrum with good and evil, and that's just a false analogue, there are countless act's of 'evil' perpetrated by true believers on any end of the political spectrum and in all honesty what's considered 'left' and 'right' changes over time. Actions are what matter, and are the true judge of good and evil, not some arbitrary defention of current political divisions.
你把政治光譜等同于善惡，這只是一個錯誤的類比，無論在政治光譜的哪一端，狂熱的信徒都犯下了無數(shù)的“惡行”，而且說實話，隨著時間的推移，“左”和“右”的定義也會發(fā)生變化。重要的是行動，它們才是評判善惡的真正標準，而不是對當前政治分歧的隨意定義。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://top-shui.cn 轉載請注明出處
it is this group's heritage.
這是這個群體的傳承。
100% accurate
百分之百準確。
? @Tom-b1i3o Well, there’s tens of millions of people on both sides, so of course both sides will have plenty of good and bad individuals. We’re talking about the party as a collective and its official stance. As a collective party from the top down, Republicans are all of these things and proud of it.
好吧，兩邊都有數(shù)千萬的人，所以兩邊當然都有很多好人和壞人。我們談論的是作為一個整體的政黨及其官方立場。作為一個自上而下的集體政黨，共和黨人就是這樣的，并且以此為榮。